Channel
@data_stitches
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
292subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001471912912 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @data_stitches |
| Description | 分享数据可视化，交互叙事项目以及创作者们使用的工具。 Curator: t.me/datastitches_curator Newsletter: https://datastitches.substack.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/data_stitches |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 292 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 292 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 19 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
20 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 45.0% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2024 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这个项目刚刚入围了今年的 DH Awards (http://dhawards.org/dhawards2025/voting/)，目前也进入了公众投票阶段。 如果你对数字人文感兴趣，也可以在DH Awards网站上探索其他有趣的作品，投票对所有人开放（无需注册），截止日期是 4 月 17 日。 非常感谢你的支持！ https://datastitches.substack.com/p/mapping-the-pioneers-of-digital-art
👍3
分享一个最近参与刚刚上线的项目：基于历史数据构建的交互式可视化，整合了 compArt（daDA）数据库与V&A Computer Arts Society档案， 重构了 1960s–2000s 早期数字艺术生态系统 欢迎体验 👉 https://tracingdigital.art
在假期前一天拿到了market cafe magazine issue 9，记得issue 1还是在17年参加Density Design举办的Visualized大会上发布的，如今两位编辑决定停更这个项目，要跟这个目前市面上唯一的data visualization zine说再见了
❤3
最近一些赛博上电视📺 在香港的朋友欢迎去线下体验「改变中的自然:在计算艺术中探索生命」数字艺术展
🔥4❤1
十月一些大大小小的地图 #cartography
👍4❤2
https://open.substack.com/pub/datastitches/p/48a
❤3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @data_stitches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 682,542 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Data Stitches” (@data_stitches), 292 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/data_stitches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.