Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dima Vo

Channel

Dima Vo

@dimavodima

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,775subscribers

-106 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752182858
TypeChannel
Username@dimavodima
DescriptionТурагентство Xtrip — @xtripxtrip Лайф-канал — @dimavodima2 36 стран. Путешествия, саморазвитие и веселый лайф Работать со мной 📩 @krasnovmedia // [email protected] https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/679caf78e7235e5c9e3f787e
Created15 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dimavodima

Growth

42,77542,88142,8286 August 2026 — 42,881 subscribers6 August 2026 — 42,881 subscribers7 August 2026 — 42,871 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,858 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,846 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42,822 subscribers11 August 2026 — 42,819 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,782 subscribers13 August 2026 — 42,778 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,775 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -106. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,759–42,897 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:0742,775-3
13 Aug 2026, 06:3542,778-4
12 Aug 2026, 08:2342,782-37
11 Aug 2026, 08:4242,819-3
10 Aug 2026, 11:2442,822-24
9 Aug 2026, 14:1342,846-12
8 Aug 2026, 13:4442,858-13
7 Aug 2026, 12:4042,871-10
6 Aug 2026, 13:2042,881no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4742,881first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 42,775 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held11 (23 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total113,570
Reactions total4,908
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,510
Videos
345
Links
145

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,908 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,87358.5%
💋1,27626.0%
💔49710.1%
🗿2625.34%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,908reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dimavodima. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC≈6,700 views605 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026
Photo

прикол есть такой... по жизни видеть во всем красивое и прикольное…

💋355161💔86🗿3

11 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈8,350 views600 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

friendly reminder

422💋123🗿53💔2

9 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈9,920 views718 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

браслетик. нишевый.

460💔149💋103🗿6

31 Jul 2026, 15:42 UTC≈16,100 views562 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

«Дмитрий, простите, но вам через 2 недели необходимо покинуть квартиру», в которой я живу 3,5 года 😐😐😐 Мой домик, который ждал меня из Америк, Австралий и Азий… 🥺🥺🥺 Сомнительно… БОЛЬНО… А кому щас легко? 🤷🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️ Благо, накопленный годами опыт в виде двухсот тонн вещей собрать помогут специалисты из Поиска Яндекса по услугам, пока я буду добивать свои драгоценные часы в Серфе… Я с этой драмой не справлюсь. Новую

396💔137🗿29

30 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC≈11,700 views538 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Увидел это небо и купил билеты на Бали #соскучился

343💋130💔65

30 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC≈11,000 views414 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

напоминаю, это админ канала

274💋93🗿45💔2

29 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC≈10,400 views591 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

На Авиамоторной «кто-то» раздавил машину ЖОПОЙ

423🗿96💋69💔3

27 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈10,600 views87 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @englishwithzaePhoto

#ДимаВо Дима для меня не просто ученик, а еще и хороший друг. Часто можно услышать, что с друзьями работать не стоит — мол, результата не будет. Наш опыт показал обратное. Наш путь нельзя назвать идеальным. Мы делали перерывы в занятиях, возвращались к обучению, снова набирали темп. Много работали над произношением, разбирали сложные темы по грамматике и шаг за шагом развивали уверенность в разговорной речи. Сегод

79💋5🗿3

27 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC≈9,440 views70 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ни один язык без среды вы не выучите до свободного уровня, вам необходимы общение, ежедневный просмотр английских фильмов / сериалов и человек, который вас в эту среду будет погружать (я сам после 3 месяцев в Мск ловлю себя на ступоре периодически) 🗣️🇺🇸 Ребят, я занимаюсь английским с репетитором без перерывов почти 4 года, и именно этот период послужил квантовым скачком в изучении языка Никита мой стаааааарый друг

63🗿7

27 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC≈8,860 views89 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

69🗿20

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dimavodima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 55,651 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

полина тихонова 🍄
@tikhonovap · 112,630
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 August 2026
небога от бога
@neboga_ot_boga · 104,659
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 August 2026
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 205,601
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dima Vo” (@dimavodima), 42,775 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimavodima.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.