Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 53 days, net +796. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,182–7,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 22:36
7,170
-332
15 Sept 2026, 19:39
7,502
-15
12 Sept 2026, 12:59
7,517
+340
8 Sept 2026, 07:22
7,177
-57
3 Sept 2026, 02:17
7,234
-77
31 Aug 2026, 05:35
7,311
-26
28 Aug 2026, 11:42
7,337
-25
25 Aug 2026, 21:27
7,362
+3
23 Aug 2026, 06:13
7,359
+790
20 Aug 2026, 02:12
6,569
-119
16 Aug 2026, 22:34
6,688
-158
13 Aug 2026, 07:45
6,846
+490
10 Aug 2026, 07:40
6,356
-15
7 Aug 2026, 03:38
6,371
-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:45
6,374
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 54 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
388 reactions across 51 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
149
38.4%
🔥
82
21.1%
🤔
53
13.7%
❤
42
10.8%
👏
32
8.25%
🎉
13
3.35%
😱
8
2.06%
🤨
4
1.03%
🤯
4
1.03%
🤡
1
0.258%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 54 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalreal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 Как внедрить AI в компании и не застрять на этапе пилота?
27 августа в 12:00 по Астане VK Cloud проведет онлайн-вебинар:
«Как внедрить AI в компании: от первых сценариев к масштабируемой enterprise-архитектуре»
Многие компании уже тестируют AI-инструменты, но при переходе к реальному внедрению появляются вопросы: как подготовить данные, выстроить архитектуру, подключить RAG, AI-агентов, GPU-инфраструктуру и при э…
Уолл-стрит больше не спорит с криптой — она продаёт её клиентам
Крипторынок остаётся под давлением, но крупнейшие финансовые институты продолжают расширять работу с цифровыми активами.
📌 Два института с активами свыше $1 трлн одобрили криптопродукты для клиентов этим летом. Bitwise не раскрывает их названия.
Гендиректор Bitwise Хантер Хорсли назвал это поворотным моментом: банки перешли «на другую сторону стола» и…
ИИ начал создавать следующий ИИ. Петля замыкается?
OpenAI и Anthropic впервые показали, что ИИ участвует в создании следующего ИИ. Петля начинается, но пока не замкнута
ИИ уже начал участвовать в создании следующего ИИ
5 февраля 2026 года OpenAI сообщила: GPT-5.3-Codex «сыграла существенную роль в создании самой себя». Через четыре месяца Anthropic раскрыла данные — более 80% кода в их кодовую базу уже пишет Claud…
Google делает ставку не на железо, а на Gemini в Pixel 11
Google представила линейку Pixel 11 — четыре модели на новом чипе Tensor G6. Главное изменение не в дизайне, а в том, насколько глубоко в устройства встроен Gemini.
# Google делает ставку не на железо, а на Gemini в Pixel 11
Google представила линейку Pixel 11 — четыре модели на новом чипе Tensor G6. Главное изменение не в дизайне, а в том, насколько глубок…
Demo Day AI'preneurs: 16 AI-стартапов представят итоги акселерации в Астане
21 августа в центре alem.ai 16 стартап-команд презентуют питчи перед инвесторами — финал трёхмесячной акселерации AI'preneurs от Astana Hub.
Demo Day AI'preneurs: 16 AI-стартапов представят итоги акселерации в Астане
Подготовлено RD media
21 августа в центре alem.ai 16 стартап-команд презентуют питчи перед инвесторами — финал трёхмесячной…
KPMG: разрыв в ИИ достигает 40 пунктов
Компании с агентным ИИ в финансах опережают остальных на 32–40 процентных пунктов. Организации с audit readiness показывают более высокие результаты по сравнению со ставкой на скорость внедрения.
KPMG: разрыв в ИИ достигает 40 пунктов
Подготовлено RD media
Компании с агентным ИИ в финансах опережают остальных на 32–40 процентных пунктов. Организации с audit readiness показыва…
Китайская GLM-5.3 обогнала Mythos 5 в тесте на поиск уязвимостей — и отложила релиз собственных весов
Z.ai представила GLM-5.3 — open-weight модель, релиз весов которой отложен на две недели. На CyberGym модель набрала 84,5% против 83,8% у закрытой Mythos 5, но в эксплуатации уступает.
Китайская GLM-5.3 обогнала Mythos 5 в тесте на поиск уязвимостей — и отложила релиз собственных весов
Подготовлено RD media
Китай…
Живые нейроны человека в серверном стеллаже: первый запуск в Сингапуре
Консорциум DayOne, Cortical Labs и NUS Medicine представил 20-модульную систему CL1 — биологически интегрированный серверный стеллаж.
Живые нейроны человека в серверном стеллаже
Подготовлено RD media
Консорциум из трёх организаций запустил в Сингапуре то, что называет первым в мире биологически интегрированным серверным стеллажом — 20 модулей C…
# Бизнес учится считать стоимость ИИ: от цены токена — к стоимости результата
Глобальные расходы на ИИ приближаются к $1 трлн в год. Но лишь 23% руководителей могут измерить отдачу.
Бизнес учится считать стоимость ИИ: от цены токена — к стоимости результата
Подготовлено RD media
Глобальные расходы на ИИ приближаются к $1 трлн в год. Но лишь 23% руководителей могут измерить отдачу от этих инвестиций.
📌 Проблема: …
Tether впервые прошла полный аудит: KPMG выдала заключение без оговорок
Один из самых старых вопросов крипторынка получил самый серьёзный ответ за всю историю Tether
Tether впервые прошла полный аудит: KPMG выдала заключение без оговорок
Подготовлено RD media
Один из самых старых вопросов крипторынка — что стоит за USDT — получил самый серьёзный ответ за всю историю Tether.
KPMG U.S. провела первый полноценный а…
# Энергосистема США не успевает за бумом дата-центров
1 066 ГВт заявок на подключение. Реально будет построено — треть. Но даже этого хватит, чтобы перегрузить сети.
Энергосистема США не успевает за бумом дата-центров
Подготовлено RD media
Американские дата-центры подали заявки на 1 066 ГВт мощностей — 83% всей генерации США. Wood Mackenzie считает, что реально будет построено не больше трети: девелоперы подают од…
Что такое токен в ИИ: простое объяснение
Миллион токенов у одной ИИ-модели может стоить несколько центов, у другой — $10. Разбираем, что такое токен и как работает экономика ИИ.
Миллион токенов стоит от нескольких центов до $10 — и это одна единица измерения
Подготовлено RD media
В августе 2026 года миллион входных токенов у Qwen Flash стоит несколько центов, у Claude Fable 5 — $10. Разница в сотни раз. Но токен …
👍6❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @digitalreal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@digitalreal named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gamesofthefuture_astana named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
bluescreen.kz @bluescreenkz · 24,045 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
The Tech @thetechkz · 27,098 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REAL DIGITAL” (@digitalreal), 7,170 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalreal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.