Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for REAL DIGITAL

Channel

REAL DIGITAL

@digitalreal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

7,170subscribers

+796 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001262195274
TypeChannel
Username@digitalreal
Created1 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalreal

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,3567,5176,936.56 August 2026 — 6,374 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,371 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,356 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,846 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,688 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,569 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,359 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,362 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,337 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,311 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,234 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,177 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,517 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,502 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,170 subscribers7,1706 August 202628 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 53 days, net +796. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,182–7,691 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 22:367,170-332
15 Sept 2026, 19:397,502-15
12 Sept 2026, 12:597,517+340
8 Sept 2026, 07:227,177-57
3 Sept 2026, 02:177,234-77
31 Aug 2026, 05:357,311-26
28 Aug 2026, 11:427,337-25
25 Aug 2026, 21:277,362+3
23 Aug 2026, 06:137,359+790
20 Aug 2026, 02:126,569-119
16 Aug 2026, 22:346,688-158
13 Aug 2026, 07:456,846+490
10 Aug 2026, 07:406,356-15
7 Aug 2026, 03:386,371-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:456,374first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 54 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

388 reactions across 51 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14938.4%
🔥8221.1%
🤔5313.7%
❤4210.8%
👏328.25%
🎉133.35%
😱82.06%
🤨41.03%
🤯41.03%
🤡10.258%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 54 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @digitalreal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,310 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Как внедрить AI в компании и не застрять на этапе пилота? 27 августа в 12:00 по Астане VK Cloud проведет онлайн-вебинар: «Как внедрить AI в компании: от первых сценариев к масштабируемой enterprise-архитектуре» Многие компании уже тестируют AI-инструменты, но при переходе к реальному внедрению появляются вопросы: как подготовить данные, выстроить архитектуру, подключить RAG, AI-агентов, GPU-инфраструктуру и при э…

👏7👍3🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈1,060 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уолл-стрит больше не спорит с криптой — она продаёт её клиентам Крипторынок остаётся под давлением, но крупнейшие финансовые институты продолжают расширять работу с цифровыми активами. 📌 Два института с активами свыше $1 трлн одобрили криптопродукты для клиентов этим летом. Bitwise не раскрывает их названия. Гендиректор Bitwise Хантер Хорсли назвал это поворотным моментом: банки перешли «на другую сторону стола» и…

👍4

20 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026

ИИ начал создавать следующий ИИ. Петля замыкается? OpenAI и Anthropic впервые показали, что ИИ участвует в создании следующего ИИ. Петля начинается, но пока не замкнута ИИ уже начал участвовать в создании следующего ИИ 5 февраля 2026 года OpenAI сообщила: GPT-5.3-Codex «сыграла существенную роль в создании самой себя». Через четыре месяца Anthropic раскрыла данные — более 80% кода в их кодовую базу уже пишет Claud…

👍7🤔1

19 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,150 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Google делает ставку не на железо, а на Gemini в Pixel 11 Google представила линейку Pixel 11 — четыре модели на новом чипе Tensor G6. Главное изменение не в дизайне, а в том, насколько глубоко в устройства встроен Gemini. # Google делает ставку не на железо, а на Gemini в Pixel 11 Google представила линейку Pixel 11 — четыре модели на новом чипе Tensor G6. Главное изменение не в дизайне, а в том, насколько глубок…

👍3

19 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,230 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Demo Day AI'preneurs: 16 AI-стартапов представят итоги акселерации в Астане 21 августа в центре alem.ai 16 стартап-команд презентуют питчи перед инвесторами — финал трёхмесячной акселерации AI'preneurs от Astana Hub. Demo Day AI'preneurs: 16 AI-стартапов представят итоги акселерации в Астане Подготовлено RD media 21 августа в центре alem.ai 16 стартап-команд презентуют питчи перед инвесторами — финал трёхмесячной…

❤6👍1

19 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,310 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

KPMG: разрыв в ИИ достигает 40 пунктов Компании с агентным ИИ в финансах опережают остальных на 32–40 процентных пунктов. Организации с audit readiness показывают более высокие результаты по сравнению со ставкой на скорость внедрения. KPMG: разрыв в ИИ достигает 40 пунктов Подготовлено RD media Компании с агентным ИИ в финансах опережают остальных на 32–40 процентных пунктов. Организации с audit readiness показыва…

👍3❤1👏1

19 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC≈1,170 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Китайская GLM-5.3 обогнала Mythos 5 в тесте на поиск уязвимостей — и отложила релиз собственных весов Z.ai представила GLM-5.3 — open-weight модель, релиз весов которой отложен на две недели. На CyberGym модель набрала 84,5% против 83,8% у закрытой Mythos 5, но в эксплуатации уступает. Китайская GLM-5.3 обогнала Mythos 5 в тесте на поиск уязвимостей — и отложила релиз собственных весов Подготовлено RD media Китай…

❤4👍2🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,250 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Живые нейроны человека в серверном стеллаже: первый запуск в Сингапуре Консорциум DayOne, Cortical Labs и NUS Medicine представил 20-модульную систему CL1 — биологически интегрированный серверный стеллаж. Живые нейроны человека в серверном стеллаже Подготовлено RD media Консорциум из трёх организаций запустил в Сингапуре то, что называет первым в мире биологически интегрированным серверным стеллажом — 20 модулей C…

😱3

18 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,290 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

# Бизнес учится считать стоимость ИИ: от цены токена — к стоимости результата Глобальные расходы на ИИ приближаются к $1 трлн в год. Но лишь 23% руководителей могут измерить отдачу. Бизнес учится считать стоимость ИИ: от цены токена — к стоимости результата Подготовлено RD media Глобальные расходы на ИИ приближаются к $1 трлн в год. Но лишь 23% руководителей могут измерить отдачу от этих инвестиций. 📌 Проблема: …

👍4🤔1

18 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC≈1,250 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Tether впервые прошла полный аудит: KPMG выдала заключение без оговорок Один из самых старых вопросов крипторынка получил самый серьёзный ответ за всю историю Tether Tether впервые прошла полный аудит: KPMG выдала заключение без оговорок Подготовлено RD media Один из самых старых вопросов крипторынка — что стоит за USDT — получил самый серьёзный ответ за всю историю Tether. KPMG U.S. провела первый полноценный а…

🔥6👍1

17 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,270 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

# Энергосистема США не успевает за бумом дата-центров 1 066 ГВт заявок на подключение. Реально будет построено — треть. Но даже этого хватит, чтобы перегрузить сети. Энергосистема США не успевает за бумом дата-центров Подготовлено RD media Американские дата-центры подали заявки на 1 066 ГВт мощностей — 83% всей генерации США. Wood Mackenzie считает, что реально будет построено не больше трети: девелоперы подают од…

🤔5🤨1

17 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,290 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Что такое токен в ИИ: простое объяснение Миллион токенов у одной ИИ-модели может стоить несколько центов, у другой — $10. Разбираем, что такое токен и как работает экономика ИИ. Миллион токенов стоит от нескольких центов до $10 — и это одна единица измерения Подготовлено RD media В августе 2026 года миллион входных токенов у Qwen Flash стоит несколько центов, у Claude Fable 5 — $10. Разница в сотни раз. Но токен …

👍6❤2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @digitalreal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

bluescreen.kz
@bluescreenkz · 24,045
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 September 2026
The Tech
@thetechkz · 27,098
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q140500382 on Wikidata, read 27 September 2026
LabelReal Digital
YouTubeUC32q96QZ3bdS1bHUaP0hgBg
Official sitehttps://www.realdigital.kz/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“REAL DIGITAL” (@digitalreal), 7,170 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalreal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.