Channel
@digitalmarketing34
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
164,400subscribers
-76 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001375329707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @digitalmarketing34 |
| Description | نُعد القناة لتكون مرجعًا للمهتمين بتعلم التسويق الرقمي وتخصصاته، وتوفير مئات مصادر التعلم .. للتعاون معنا على Growth E-learning | منصة تسويق رقمي تعليمي، بنساعدك توصل لجمهورك وتحقق نمو حقيقي 🎯 https://www.facebook.com/GrowthElearningedu?mibextid=ZbWKwL |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/digitalmarketing34 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 164,400 | -64 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 164,464 | -46 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 164,510 | -31 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 164,541 | -41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:42 | 164,582 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 164,587 | +49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 164,538 | +62 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 164,476 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (6 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 97,190 |
| Reactions total | 290 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
468 reactions across 23 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 427 | 91.2% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 7.48% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بتفكر تدخل مجال إدارة المشاريع ومش عارف تبدأ منين؟ 👀 إدارة المشاريع مش مجرد إنك تعرف تعمل خطة وخلاص، المجال فيه مهارات كتير، من التخطيط وإدارة المخاطر والميزانيات، لإدارة الفرق وأصحاب المصلحة، وكمان Agile وScrum. وعشان كده جمعنالك 3 مسارات احترافية في إدارة المشاريع من شركات عالمية زي Google وIBM وMicrosoft. 🎯 > https://tinyurl.com/3uhkz5es المسارات مناسبة للمبتدئين، وبتبدأ معاك من الأساسيات، وبعدها تنتقل للتطبي…
❤13
تخيل أن شخصين تقدما إلى الوظيفة نفسها، ولديهما تقريبًا نفس المستوى من المهارات المهنية. لكن أحدهما يعرف كيف يتحدث مع الآخرين، ويعرض أفكاره بوضوح، ويتعامل مع ضغط العمل، وينظم وقته، ويعمل جيدًا ضمن فريق. والآخر يمتلك مهارات مهنية جيدة، لكنه يجد صعوبة في التواصل والتعامل مع الآخرين. برأيك، من منهما ستكون فرصته أفضل؟ هنا تأتي أهمية المهارات الناعمة. فقد تكون مهاراتك المهنية في تخصصك لا تزال ضعيفة، لكن امتلاكك لمها…
❤16🔥1
عايز تبدأ في التسويق بالمحتوى ومش عارف تبدأ منين؟ 🤔 متبدأش بكتابة منشورات عشوائية كل يوم وتستنى الناس تتفاعل 😂 ومينفعش تتعامل مع التسويق بالمحتوى على أنه = منشورات بتُكتب وفقط ! قبل ما تكتب أول قطعة محتوى، لازم تفهم الأول: ✅ يعني إيه تسويق بالمحتوى أصلًا؟ ✅ وليه الشركات بتستخدمه؟ ✅ وإزاي المحتوى ممكن يساعدك تجذب جمهور وتحوّله لعملاء؟ عشان كده لو أنت لسه جديد في المجال، ابدأ بدليل «ما هو التسويق بالمحتوى؟ شرح شام…
❤10
دليل تعلم أساسيات التسويق بالمحتوى ❤✅ الدليل يآخذك من مرحلة اللامعرفة حتى تصل إلى مرحلة المتوسطة لكن إذا طبقت ما تتعلم بالتأكيد، وليس مجرد القراءة والمشاهدة العابرة التي ستخلق منك مسوق بالمحتوى وهذا الدليل صٌمم للجادين فقط = لأنه سيأخذ قرابة 6 أشهر دراسة وكل شخص حسب مجهوده، لكن نصيحتي لك لا تستعجل ولا تجعل سرعة الإنهاء هدفك وركز على اكتساب القيمة والتعلم والتطبيق
❤27
الراتب مهم... لكنه ليس المكسب الحقيقي إذا كان كل ما تخرج به من عملك. في كل سنة تقضيها في وظيفتك، اسأل نفسك: هل زادت مهاراتي؟ هل توسعت شبكة علاقاتي؟ هل أصبحت سمعتي المهنية أقوى؟ وهل بنيت أمانًا ماليًا يمنحني حرية القرار؟ الراتب يُصرف، لكن الخبرة، والمهارة، والسمعة، والعلاقات تبقى وتضاعف قيمتك في سوق العمل. اجعل الراتب أحد مكاسبك... لا المكسب الوحيد.
❤31
قد تكون كتبت عشرات المنشورات ... لكنها لم تحقق تفاعلًا .. وقد تكون أنشأت حملة إعلانية ممتازة ... لكنها لم تحقق مبيعات. والمشكلة ليست دائمًا في المنتج أو الميزانية. أحيانًا تكون في مهارة واحدة فقط ... أن تقول الشيء الصحيح، للشخص المناسب، بالطريقة المناسبة. ✍️ ولهذا السبب لا يكتفي المسوق المحترف بتعلم الإعلانات أو السوشيال ميديا فقط، بل يتعلم كيف يفكر، ويبحث، ويكتب، ويحلل، ويقنع. ولو كنت في بداية طريقك، أو تعمل بال…
❤17
بتنشر محتوى كل يوم... لكن مفيش نتائج؟ غالبًا المشكلة مش في جودة المحتوى، المشكلة إنك بتنشر بدون استراتيجية. كتير من الناس تفتكر إن الحل هو زيادة عدد المنشورات، بينما الحقيقة إن أول سؤال لازم تجاوب عليه هو: ليه بكتب المحتوى ده أصلًا هل هدفه زيادة المبيعات؟ ولا جمع عملاء محتملين؟ ولا بناء ثقة؟ ولا زيادة الزيارات؟ بعدها تبدأ تحدد جمهورك، وتحلل منافسيك، وتختار أنواع المحتوى المناسبة، ثم تحول كل ده إلى خطة محتوى شهري…
❤25
من أكبر المشاكل اللي هتواجهك في تعلم التسويق الرقمي هو الإنجليزي يعني لو عايز تتعلم أي شيء فأغلب المصادر هتلقيها أجنبية، فعشان متخليش اللغة عقبة في وشك هذا كورس إنجليزي مجاني من الجامعة الأمريكية 😃 https://tinyurl.com/3e6h2fns تقدر تذاكره وتحسن من لغتك عشان توصل لمصادر تعليمية أكثر نزود كورسات انجليزي؟ ❤
❤19👍3
كنز لمن يريد تعلم التسويق الرقمي 🔥 7 مصادر هينقلوا مستواك من الصفر للأول عميل بإذن الله تابع التعليقات
❤14👍10
- ما هو التسويق الإلكتروني؟ - تخصصات التسويق الإلكتروني - طريقة تعلم التسويق - مصادر تعلم التسويق - كيفية الحصول على وظيفة؟
❤21👍3
ما هو التسويق الرقمي Marketing؟ التسويق الإلكتروني أو الرقمي هو بكل بساطة = الوصول إلى العملاء عبر الإنترنت لإخبارهم بما تبيعه سواء كان خدمة أو منتج، وإقناعهم به، ثم تحويلهم إلى مشترين أو عملاء. والتسويق الإلكتروني بيتكون من تخصصات مختلفة مثل: 1⃣ التسويق عبر منصات التواصل الرقمية 2⃣ التسويق بالمحتوى 3⃣ التسويق عبر محركات البحث 4⃣ التسويق بالبريد الإلكتروني 5⃣ التسويق بالفيديو ...إلخ فلو عايزه تعرف عن التسويق وكي…
❤20
ما مستوى معرفتك عن التسويق الرقمي؟
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @digitalmarketing34. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@digitalmarketing34 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ما مستوى معرفتك عن التسويق الرقمي؟
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,170,677 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Marketing” (@digitalmarketing34), 164,400 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalmarketing34.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.