Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +2,111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,408–5,155 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:19
4,838
+1,975
14 Sept 2026, 14:41
2,863
+123
11 Sept 2026, 06:40
2,740
+10
6 Sept 2026, 14:37
2,730
-1
2 Sept 2026, 00:23
2,731
+4
30 Aug 2026, 02:37
2,727
-1
24 Aug 2026, 13:06
2,728
+1
21 Aug 2026, 06:24
2,727
+2
18 Aug 2026, 15:36
2,725
-2
15 Aug 2026, 18:23
2,727
-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:41
2,729
+1
8 Aug 2026, 23:13
2,728
+1
7 Aug 2026, 23:31
2,727
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:29
2,727
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13
39.4%
👍
9
27.3%
👏
8
24.2%
🔥
3
9.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 شركة Anthropic نزلت حالا بـ Sonnet 5 — والمرة دي الموضوع مختلف
مش موديل أذكى و بس.
الفرق بين Sonnet 4.6 وSonnet 5 مش في الإجابات — في الإنجاز.
موديل Sonnet 4.5 كان بيوصل لنقطة معينة في المهمة... وبيوقف.
انما Sonnet 5 بيكمّل.
🎯 أهم 4 حاجات في الإعلان:
1️⃣ انه أيجنتيك بجد
مش بس بيرد على أسئلة. بيفتح browser، بيشغّل terminal، بيعمل debugging، بيكتب كود ويتحقق منه لوحده — من غير ما إنت تطلب منه.
2️⃣ بيراجع شغله …
🔒أقوي نموذج ذكاء إصطناعي Claude هيبدأ يطلب منك بطاقتك الشخصية علشان تكمل استخدامه بدايه من يوليو القادم .
الموضوع بجد ومش كل الناس لاقت الإشعار ده أو خدت بالها من تحديثات الخصوصية .
شركة Anthropic أعلنت رسمياً عن نظام Identity Verification جديد هيتم تطبيقه بدايه من يوليو —
في لحظة معينة ممكن تطلع لك شاشة بتقولك:
"محتاجين نتأكد من هويتك قبل ما تكمل."
🎯 إيه اللي هيحصل بالظبط؟
✅ لازم تضيف جواز سفر أو رخصة قيادة أو …
مؤتمر Code with Claude London 2026 — كنز تعليمي مجاني للـ AI Agents
🚨 شركة أنثروبيك نزّلت مؤتمرها كله على يوتيوب مجاناً...
وده أكبر كنز تعليمي للـ AI Agents في 2026
تخيل إن الناس اللي بتصنع الذكاء الاصطناعي بنفسها، قاعدة تشرحلك بإيدها إزاي الشغل بيتعمل — مش حد ناقل عنهم، ده المصدر نفسه.
ده مؤتمر "Code with Claude" اللي اتعمل في لندن السنة دي، ونزل كامل على القناة الرسمية بتاعتهم. يومين كاملين، حوالي 40 سيشن، مرتبين…
🔥شركة Anthropic طلعت بـ Claude Opus 4.8 النهارده — علشان تعيد علي كل محبين نماذجها .
موديل أحسن بتعديلات علي الموديل القديم - اللي كان فيه مشاكل بقاله فترة -.
خليني أحكيلك إيه اللي اتغير فعلاً 👇
🎯 الأهم في Opus 4.8:
1️⃣ بيشتغل لوحده أطول من أي موديل قبله
مش بيقف كل شوية يسألك "عايز أكمل؟"
بيتبنى، بيجرب، بيصلح — لوحده.
2️⃣ أمين أكتر في تقييم نفسه
لو مش واثق في إجابة — بيقولك صراحة.
ده أهم من الـ accuracy نفسها.
3…
وعلشان أشارككم الرحلة دي... في خبر كبير ومهم🎯
بعد كل المعافرة دي، RssDrop — اللي بنيته — بي launch على أكبر منصة SaaS في العالم..
منصة Product Hunt 🚀 يوم 26 الجاي.
وعلشان تدعموا الإطلاق ده ومن باب اني أخد ثقه وأكمل اللي بنيته بيكم ومعاكم ، عندي ليكم هدايا كتير للحدث ده :
الهدية الأولى 🎁
تجربة مجانية شهر كامل لـRssDrop.
تجربوا بنفسكم البديل اللي بنيته للمنصات العملاقة دي — وتتأكدوا بنفسكم إن الأدوات اللي بنيت بيها …
🚀 كنت بدفع كل شهر علشان أستخدم حاجة... قررت أبنيها بنفسي. وده اللي اتعلمته.
مش كل قرار في حياتنا بيبدأ بخطة ضخمة.
أحياناً بيبدأ بفاتورة اشتراك ...
بتوصلك إنك وإنت بتفكر: "هل أنا فعلاً بدفع فلوس دي كل شهر؟ ومكمل كده هل لسه مستفيد بيه ولا ألغي الاشتراك ؟"
ده بالظبط اللي حصل معايا مع منصات زي rss. app وFeedspot .
وفي غيرهم طبعا منصات تانيه كتير جربتها وما فادتنيش بالشكل اللي كنت عاوزه وخصوصا مع تطور ال AI اللي بقيت ب…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sherifalkadymarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
علوم و تقنيات | Arabes1.com @arabes1 · 21,595 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 September 2026
الذكاء الاصطناعي بالعربية @Ai_Arabic1 · 57,981 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Marketing @digitalmarketing34 · 163,479 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 12 August 2026
AtoZ Courses @atozcourse · 25,385 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr.Sherif Al-Kady || AI Marketing” (@sherifalkadymarketing), 4,838 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sherifalkadymarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
