Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Малюгин | Geeks

@digitalgeeks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

940subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793610770
TypeChannel
Username@digitalgeeks
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/digitalgeeks

Growth

940945942.57 Aug 2026, 09:48 — 945 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:37 — 940 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:488 Aug 2026, 09:37
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 939–946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:37940-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:48945first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.60%
avg views ÷ 940 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (18 February 20267 August 2026)
Views total62
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5777.0%
😁79.46%
22.70%
👍22.70%
💯22.70%
🤩22.70%
🏆11.35%
👌11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥈 Digital Geeks — 2 место в рейтинге GEO-агентств GEOMI за I полугодие 2026 года Рынок GEO только формируется, и здорово, что начинают появляться профильные рейтинги. Пока их совсем немного, поэтому каждая такая инициатива помогает сделать рынок более прозрачным. В рейтинге GEOMI основным критерием являются именно опубликованные GEO-кейсы. У нас их уже 10 (и это еще не все проекты, которые мы реализовали), поэтому

🔥5

8 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC467 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

18 июня выступаю на Tech Week 2026 в Москве Расскажу про нестандартные стратегии, которые помогают компаниям увеличивать продажи, когда конкуренция высокая, а спрос ограничен. Мне кажется, сейчас это один из главных вопросов для бизнеса. Потому что просто «лить больше трафика» уже не всегда работает. Реклама дорожает, клиент дольше думает, в выдаче и рекомендациях всё больше конкурентов, а привычные каналы постепен

🔥81

25 May 2026, 09:35 UTC481 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как попасть в ответы нейросетей, если вы производите B2C товары Завтра выступаю на GEO-кейс-конференции 2026 от Пиксель Тулс Будет 11 практических кейсов про продвижение брендов в нейросетях: Алисе, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI и других системах. Без общей теории в духе «ИИ меняет мир». Только разборы, что реально сработало в разных нишах. Я расскажу очень интересный кейс Digital Geeks: Как b2c бренду попасть в

🔥6

16 Apr 2026, 14:02 UTC592 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Workspace Digital Awards 2026 Я в жюри Workspace Digital Awards 2026, оцениваю GEO-кейсы и хочу поделиться одним наблюдением. Недавно закончился первый этап и начался второй — уже по шорт-листу. Кстати, наш кейс тоже туда попал 😎 Приятно. В Workspace Digital Awards 2026 сейчас продолжается оценка кейсов — уже по шорт-листу. Но написать хочу не про это. Пока очень хорошо видно, что рынок все еще часто воспринимает

🔥8

10 Apr 2026, 08:50 UTC557 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

16 апреля я выступаю на онлайн-конференции Travel Marketing о продвижении турбизнеса в 2026 году. 🗓16 апреля 14:15 - 15:00 по МСК 📍Онлайн в ВК и Rutube 🆓 Бесплатно Расскажу про GEO: как попасть в рекомендации нейросетей? ▪️ Нейросети теперь напрямую рекомендуют туристам конкретные компании — это новый канал продаж ▪️ Если вашего бренда нет в ответах ИИ — клиенты уходят к тем, кого нейросеть назвала первой ▪️ ИИ вы

🔥2

7 Apr 2026, 07:15 UTC508 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В Яндексе появился отчет по AI-видимости В Яндекс Вебмастере появился новый отчет — видимость сайта в Алисе AI. Пока можно зафиксировать только сам факт появления. И это уже хорошо — движение началось. Если смотреть на инструмент как на рабочий, то впечатление сдержанное. Вряд ли это станет регулярным инструментом в текущем виде — не очень понятно, какие управленческие решения можно принимать на основе этих данных.

🔥6

24 Mar 2026, 14:00 UTC473 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В этот четверг покажу, как выглядит продвижение в нейросетях изнутри. Без теории и «разобрали кейс на слайдах» расскажу, как на самом деле мы это делаем в работе. Сейчас вокруг GEO много разговоров. Но если убрать все красивые слова, остается простой вопрос: что конкретно нужно сделать, чтобы нейросеть начала рекомендовать именно ваш бренд? На воркшопе пройдем это целиком — вживую, на реальном кейсе. Разберем: —

🔥4

20 Mar 2026, 07:19 UTC264 viewsread 7 August 2026

В апреле вместе с коллегами участвую в конференции про продвижение в нейросетях 🔥 Выступают только те, кто уже реально работает с нейросетями и точно понимает, как это устроено ⤵️

20 Mar 2026, 07:19 UTC372 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pixeltoolsPhoto

🚀 Мощная конференция «GEO 2026» от Пиксель Тулс и 5 экспертов рынка 14 апреля в 12:00 (МСК) мы проводим онлайн-конференцию по GEO (AI SEO) с 5 лидерами рынка — про то, как брендам использовать новый канал маркетинга и расти в ответах нейросетей уже сейчас. 👥 Для кого? • Для GEO/SEO-специалистов, маркетологов и предпринимателей. 📅 Программа конференции: https://ai.pixeltools.ru/geo-2026 • 12:00 — Начало: анонсы д

16 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC270 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В Inc. Russia вышла наша статья про GEO 😎🔥⤵️

🏆1🔥1🤩1

16 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC343 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @incrussiamediaPhoto

«ИИ не ведется на громкие лозунги»: как брендам стать заметными для чат-ботов 80% пользователей ориентируются на сводки ИИ почти при каждом втором поисковом запросе. Это значит, что теперь компаниям недостаточно быть в топе поисковой выдачи: им нужно попадать в ответы нейросетей. ‼️ Чтобы адаптировать статью под нейросети, важно понимать, как они находят информацию. ИИ не ищет отдельные ключевые слова и не опираетс

🔥3🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @digitalgeeks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 552,708 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Малюгин | Geeks” (@digitalgeeks), 940 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/digitalgeeks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.