Channel
@devadidevmahadeva108
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
216subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001637778620 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @devadidevmahadeva108 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/devadidevmahadeva108 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 216 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 215 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 215 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
18 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[The opponents further argue that] here, the phrase "The Ruler of all" expresses Nārāyaṇa's nature as the inner controller of all; that the verse "Some call Him [Agni]..." (Manu 12.123) establishes that He is propounded without mutual contradiction in the individual sections of the Vedas by terms like Agni, which become His designations by virtue of His being the inner controller of all; and that the verse "He [perva…
Now Appayya Dīkṣita systematically goes through the remaining names mentioned in the Manusmṛti verse (Indra, Prajāpati, Brahman, Maruts, and Prāṇa) and cites Vedic and Smṛti evidence to prove that every single one of these terms acts as a designation for Śiva. [Furthermore], He is designated by the word 'Indra' in the mantra "abhi tvā śūra nonumaḥ" ("We cry out to You, O Hero..."), which is recited in the Atharvaśir…
And subsequently, after explaining the manner of the origin of the sacred thread (yajñopavīta), at the time of classifying the deities who reside in its specific parts [he states]: 'तावल्लोकास्त्रयो वेदाः त्रयो देवास्त्रयोऽग्नयः । शिवसृष्टास्त्रयो वर्णास्त्रिवृत्सूत्रं समाश्रयम् ।। तद्ग्रन्थिमाश्रयत्तारस्त्रिमात्रो नादसंयुतः । तग्रन्थ्यग्रं च सावित्री वेदमाता शिवज्ञया ।।' "The three worlds, the three Vedas, the thre…
अत एव तदैकार्थ्यादेव सूत्राणां तन्मूलत्वमवधार्य तन्त्रकौमुदीकारः 'तत्र निरतिशयं सार्वज्यबीजमि'ति सूत्रे तस्य 'संज्ञादिविशेष-प्रतिपत्तिरागमतः पर्येष्यती'ति वैयासिकसूत्रभाष्यव्याख्यानावसरे संज्ञा शिवरुद्र-महेश्वरादिः, आदिशब्देन षडङ्गदशाव्यये संगृहीते इति सूत्राणां शिवविषयत्वं स्पष्टीचकार । Therefore indeed, having ascertained that the Yoga Sūtras are rooted in that [Vāyusaṃhitā] simply because they share the exact same…
❤2
Establishing Śiva Paratva within Manusmṛti Verse: Śikhariṇīmālā 39 प्रसिद्धाःस्मर्तारश्शुभद मनुयोगीश्वरमुखाः पतञ्जल्याद्याश्च प्रथितमतयो दर्शनकृतः । प्रभिन्दाना मार्गानपि च विविधानन्यविषये भवन्तं विश्वस्मादधिकमुपगच्छन्ति भगवन् ।।३९।। Translation: "O Giver of Auspiciousness! O Lord! The renowned authors of the Smṛtis, headed by Manu and the Lord of Yogins [Yājñavalkya], as well as the celebrated authors of philosop…
🌺 Ś𝐢𝐯ā𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐚 𝐕e𝐝ā𝐧𝐭𝐚 🌺 pinned «This is indeed the supreme Freedom (svātantrya) of the Self-Great Lord(Maheśvara): that for the manifestation of His own Self and the manifestation of His Divine Sovereignty (aiśvarya), He never, in any way or at any time, depends on any object separate from…»
This is indeed the supreme Freedom (svātantrya) of the Self-Great Lord(Maheśvara): that for the manifestation of His own Self and the manifestation of His Divine Sovereignty (aiśvarya), He never, in any way or at any time, depends on any object separate from His own Self or anything other than Himself. By His own self-luminous nature, He ever shines as 'I' (aham), and by the greatness of that Divine Sovereignty which…
Moreover, in that system, the Lord’s lordship is conditioned by the limitation of Māyā (māyopādhi), and is not his own inherent nature stemming from Freedom. Thus, it is inherently dependent and lacking in independence. Therefore, it is stated in the verses of Bhaṭṭa Nāyaka, as cited by Kshemarāja: "O Lord, what can this Supreme Brahman —which is napuṁsaka [i.e., impotent/inactive]– accomplish, if it is not empowere…
"If the Great Lord were to possess lordship through a body that is of a single, fixed form, He would lose His Lordship and His nature as Consciousness, just like a pot or other insentient objects." (T. Ā. 3.101) There are indeed lords like Indra and Upendra (Viṣṇu), but their lordship is not unlimited, nor is it perfectly independent. The lordship of the five causes, starting from Brahmā, is likewise limited; the sa…
❤2
Other self-proclaimed wise people argue thus: This entire expanse of modes of description and subjects (prakāratā and viśeṣyatā) is comparable to a dream; it appears only due to ignorance in the form of delusion and does not exist in reality. Like the horns of a hare or the son of a barren woman, it is entirely non-existent, yet it appears solely due to beginningless ignorance (anādi-avidyā) which is illusory. They …
❤2
Ānandalaharī of appayya dikṣitendra
❤2
viṣṇor jīvatvamśaktyamśatvam ity ubhayam apy astu. na ko ’pi dosaḥ nacaśaktyamśasya jīvatve śakter brahmakotyantarbhāvavirodhah. acidrūpo hi śivatattvādir bhūmyantahsattrimśattattvavargaś cidrūpāyāhśakter amśo ’bhyupagamyate . . . tathaiva śakter brahmakotitve ’pi visnor jīvasya tadamśatvam upapadyata iti (Ānandalaharī: 64). Let us accept both the fact that Viṣṇu is an individual self ( jīva) and the fact that He is…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @devadidevmahadeva108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌺 Ś𝐢𝐯ā𝐝𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐚 𝐕e𝐝ā𝐧𝐭𝐚 🌺” (@devadidevmahadeva108), 216 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devadidevmahadeva108.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.