Channel
@Youaremeandmeisu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,336subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001569076341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Youaremeandmeisu |
| Created | 23 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Youaremeandmeisu |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 22:01 | 2,336 | +2 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 2,334 | +12 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 2,322 | +10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 2,312 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 2,314 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 2,320 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 2,326 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 2,328 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 2,334 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 2,338 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 2,336 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 2,338 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 2,328 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 2,327 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 2,328 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 2,330 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 2,330 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 81.8% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dwelling in the ocean of the supreme ambrosia, with my mind absorbed only in the worship of Thee, may I attend to all the common operations of men, tasting the ineffable in everything. — Utpaladeva May we walk through ordinary days with an extraordinary heart. Seeing the Divine in the mundane. Tasting the infinite in the everyday. Save this if it resonates. #Utpaladeva #KashmirShaivism #Shiva #Spirituality #Devot…
❤3
Whatever Consciousness clearly intends and does not obstruct with limited identification, that very thing freely appears. The appearance of things ‘not working’ is only the temporary self-limitation of awareness. When the limitation is recognised as unreal, the natural free expression resumes.”
everything that can work, will work
🎉2
Establishing Śiva Paratva within Manusmṛti Verse: Śikhariṇīmālā 39 प्रसिद्धाःस्मर्तारश्शुभद मनुयोगीश्वरमुखाः पतञ्जल्याद्याश्च प्रथितमतयो दर्शनकृतः । प्रभिन्दाना मार्गानपि च विविधानन्यविषये भवन्तं विश्वस्मादधिकमुपगच्छन्ति भगवन् ।।३९।। Translation: "O Giver of Auspiciousness! O Lord! The renowned authors of the Smṛtis, headed by Manu and the Lord of Yogins [Yājñavalkya], as well as the celebrated authors of philosop…
[The opponents further argue that] here, the phrase "The Ruler of all" expresses Nārāyaṇa's nature as the inner controller of all; that the verse "Some call Him [Agni]..." (Manu 12.123) establishes that He is propounded without mutual contradiction in the individual sections of the Vedas by terms like Agni, which become His designations by virtue of His being the inner controller of all; and that the verse "He [perva…
❤1
Now Appayya Dīkṣita systematically goes through the remaining names mentioned in the Manusmṛti verse (Indra, Prajāpati, Brahman, Maruts, and Prāṇa) and cites Vedic and Smṛti evidence to prove that every single one of these terms acts as a designation for Śiva. [Furthermore], He is designated by the word 'Indra' in the mantra "abhi tvā śūra nonumaḥ" ("We cry out to You, O Hero..."), which is recited in the Atharvaśir…
And subsequently, after explaining the manner of the origin of the sacred thread (yajñopavīta), at the time of classifying the deities who reside in its specific parts [he states]: 'तावल्लोकास्त्रयो वेदाः त्रयो देवास्त्रयोऽग्नयः । शिवसृष्टास्त्रयो वर्णास्त्रिवृत्सूत्रं समाश्रयम् ।। तद्ग्रन्थिमाश्रयत्तारस्त्रिमात्रो नादसंयुतः । तग्रन्थ्यग्रं च सावित्री वेदमाता शिवज्ञया ।।' "The three worlds, the three Vedas, the thre…
अत एव तदैकार्थ्यादेव सूत्राणां तन्मूलत्वमवधार्य तन्त्रकौमुदीकारः 'तत्र निरतिशयं सार्वज्यबीजमि'ति सूत्रे तस्य 'संज्ञादिविशेष-प्रतिपत्तिरागमतः पर्येष्यती'ति वैयासिकसूत्रभाष्यव्याख्यानावसरे संज्ञा शिवरुद्र-महेश्वरादिः, आदिशब्देन षडङ्गदशाव्यये संगृहीते इति सूत्राणां शिवविषयत्वं स्पष्टीचकार । Therefore indeed, having ascertained that the Yoga Sūtras are rooted in that [Vāyusaṃhitā] simply because they share the exact same…
Man Whats wrong with all the fake P*rn accounts on telegram. I kicked 60+ accounts who joined this channel.
🤔4😱2🥰1
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
off topic but anyone here who needs any freelance work with the creative field ? do dm
File, posted without a caption
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Youaremeandmeisu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖳𝖱𝖨𝖪𝖠 𝖲𝖧𝖠𝖨𝖵𝖨𝖲𝖬” (@Youaremeandmeisu), 2,336 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Youaremeandmeisu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.