Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Функция Дизайна | Леонид Ивахов

@designfunction

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

234subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002396655079
TypeChannel
Username@designfunction
DescriptionПро дизайн-лидерство, назначение дизайна и его суть. С нестандартной точки зрения, через первопричины и смыслы. Потому что мне так интереснее ;)
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/designfunction

Growth

2347 Aug 2026, 09:03 — 234 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:03 — 234 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:038 Aug 2026, 10:03
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:03234no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:03234first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
7
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4252.5%
3037.5%
🎉33.75%
😁33.75%
👍11.25%
👏11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 15 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @designfunction. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2025 to 15 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Dec 2025, 12:01 UTC428 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Чтобы написать подробно про когнитивные искажения, пришлось хорошенько разобраться в том, откуда они берутся и как устроено наше мышление в целом. И тут пришлось перелопатить кучу всего: 1️⃣ Прочитать довольно непростую книгу нобелевского лаурета Даниэля Канемана «Думай медленно, решай быстро». Там все возможные искажения описаны на примере экспериментов. Там про две системы мышления: быструю и медленную. И про т

🔥9😁3👍1

Signed Леонид Ивахов

29 Sept 2025, 09:49 UTC597 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Аргументация дизайна. Часть 9. Лучшие практики (Best Practices) Когда мы ищем подкрепление / основание гарантии (Backing) в процессе аргументации дизайна, то чаще всего начинаем с поиска лучших практик. Нам кажется, что если кто-то это уже это сделал, то вероятность того, что наша гипотеза попадает в точку, повышается. Тут важно не попасть в когнитивное искажение и не словить иллюзию ложного подтверждения. Нужно по

🔥42

Signed Леонид Ивахов

26 Sept 2025, 09:36 UTC456 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всем привет! 1 октября стартует курс Next Level UI, на котором в коллабе с Мишей Розовым, Виталей Рынским и Максом Десятых я прочитаю сразу 3 лекции, посвящённые лидерству в дизайне и как быть дизайнером: 1️⃣ Стили управления в дизайне. Матрица ролей Адизеса. 2️⃣ Модель измений и работа с ограничивающими убеждениями. Пирамида нейрологических уровней Дилтса. 3️⃣ Мотивация. Какая бывает и откуда берётся. Про что

🔥2

Signed Леонид Ивахов

26 Sept 2025, 09:35 UTC318 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Леонид Ивахов

10 Sept 2025, 13:23 UTC459 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Митя Осадчук недавно на курсе Next Level ребятам рассказывал про метод прогрессивного джипега. И показал на сайте Лебедева ководство от 2010го. И когда сказал что раньше джипег грузился сверху вниз, я себя почувствовал старым 🥲 А потом показал уровни дизайна Джесса Джеймса Гарретта. И это был контрольный 🔫 С Днём рождения, Митя Осадчук! ♥️

3🎉3👏1

Signed Леонид Ивахов

9 Sept 2025, 14:01 UTC429 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dsgnrs_community

Привет! Это Лёня Ивахов, дизайн-директор (ex-Билайн, Одноклассники, МТС). Есть интересная мысль для вас — если вы уже middle, делаете работу хорошо, но возникают вопросики: → что я реально даю бизнесу и людям? → почему другие растут, а я топчусь? → где моя ценность, за что готовы платить? Чтобы ответить на них, вам придётся изучать потребности ваших клиентов и заказчиков и сформулировать ценность, которую вы может

Signed Леонид Ивахов

5 Sept 2025, 14:49 UTC350 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wannabelikerozov17febVideo

Open talk Миши Розова и Лёни Ивахова: точки роста в карьере дизайнера Системно поговорим про то как искать свои точки роста, чем здесь может помочь Customer Journey и перспектива: дизайнер — продукт, заказчик — пользователь. Все это для того, чтобы понять, как достигать результатов и преодолевать потолок, когда кажется, что ты застрял и пути наверх уже нет. Встречаемся 9 сентября в 19:00 по мск. 👉 Регистрация чер

🔥3

Signed Леонид Ивахов

4 Sept 2025, 10:26 UTC287 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ультрапотрясающий Миша Розов позвал меня на свой курс NextLevel чтобы читать там курс лекций. Я буду рассказывать и проводить воркшопы на общую тему «Как быть дизайнером». А про то как делать дизайн расскажут другие топовые ребята ☺️

🔥5

Signed Леонид Ивахов

4 Sept 2025, 10:26 UTC296 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wannabelikerozov17febPhoto

Вместо одного эксперта на next level, я собрал несколько человек в мульти-коллабу на next level Лёня Ивахов называет себя путешествующим дизайн-директором — потому что у него за спиной и много лет одноклассников, и последняя дизайн-трансформация МТСа, и потому что при этом он много путешествует по вполне загадочным местам Лёню я позвал по той причине, что унего есть большой корпоративный опыт, при этом широкое пони

4🔥3

Signed Леонид Ивахов

1 Sept 2025, 10:48 UTC256 viewsread 8 August 2026

Наконец вышел выпуск про аргументацию. Там ещё про разные когнитивные искажения, которые часто вводят в заблуждение и мешают понимать друг друга 🥳

Signed Леонид Ивахов

1 Sept 2025, 10:48 UTC321 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @designprostPhoto

Как дизайнеру быть убедительным. Леонид Ивахов У нас в гостях eх-арт-директор цифровых продуктов «Мой МТС» и автор телеграм-канала «Функции дизайна» – Леонид Ивахов. Лёня рассказал о том, как дизайнеру убеждать коллег и клиентов с помощью модели аргументации британского философа Стивена Е. Тулмина. О том, как бороться с когнитивными и искажениями и как правильная формулировка может спасти или уничтожить аргументаци

4

Signed Леонид Ивахов

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @designfunction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 293,393 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Функция Дизайна | Леонид Ивахов” (@designfunction), 234 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designfunction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.