Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

der-Revisionist

@der_Revisionist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001799184280
TypeChannel
Username@der_Revisionist
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/der_Revisionist

Growth

337 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:3033no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:0333first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.1
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total104
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
264
Videos
695
Links
725

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29m 24s
Average length
4m 12s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AntifaAufklaerungVideo

Nochmal Noch Einmal Und Nochmal Täglich Bis es Alle begreifen

30 Jul 2026, 16:21 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @stefanmagnetVideo

USA: Anthony Fauci verweigert in der Anhörung alle Fragen. Alle! Das ist also „die Wissenschaft“, wenn sie Gegenwind bekommt… Fauci verhöhnt alle Opfer seiner Corona-Zwangsmaßnahmen! Video: Ron Johnson hält Fauci einen dicken Stapel von Studien vor, die eine Wirksamkeit von Ivermectin von 60–70 % nahelegen. „Sie sagten, es gäbe keine Beweise.“ „Inwieweit waren Sie an der Sabotage von Hydroxychloroquin und Ivermect

30 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @marktplatzgdVideo

❗️💥Der Schriftsteller Navid Kermani spricht klare Worte, bei der Vereidigung von Bundeswehr-Rekruten, über Merz, das Völkerrecht und über die mögliche Befehlsverweigerung, die die Rekruten in Anspruch nehmen sollen, wenn sie von dieser kriegsgeilen Regierung in einen volkerrechtswidrigen Krieg geschickt werden sollen. Dem Pistorius entgleisen bei diesen Äußerungen völlig seine Gesichtszüge 👍💪🤗 TEILEN Folgt mir auf

26 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziellVideo

. Kennt jemand diesen "Moderator"? Wer ist das, der so viel Hass und Hetze verbreitet? ... Habs grad gefunden: Grok sagt, es handelt sich um eine taz-Produktion von Juni 2026. Der Mann mit Brille, dunklen Haaren und Bart, ist Konrad Litschko. Er ist taz-Redakteur im Ressort Reportage und Recherche (Schwerpunkt Innere Sicherheit und Rechtsextremismus) und einer der Autoren der zugehörigen Recherche (zusammen mit A

26 Jul 2026, 05:49 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026

Das mit der Bundesrepublik sollte eigentlich schon längst erledigt sein ! Eine wichtige Zusammenfassung mit Beweisen, die sogenannte Bundesrepublik ist kein Staat ⚠️ 1. Es gibt kein gültiges Grundgesetz. Der Artikel 23 (Geltungsbereich) wurde bereits 1990 durch die Alliierten gestrichen, wodurch die BRD völkerrechtlich gelöscht wurde. (Bundesgesetzblatt BGBl. 1990 Teil II S. 885 / 890 vom 23.9.1990) (Laut der Haag

25 Jul 2026, 04:28 UTC4 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Gib mir 5 min. für: Das Ende der Simulation https://youtu.be/Kbs6SRcdtSM Was wird hier gespielt? Teile diesen Beitrag mit Menschen, die das wissen sollten! Folge: @FlacheErdeInfos

25 Jul 2026, 04:28 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitistpflichtVideo

Dies ist halt leider so... Wahl = System bleibt bestehen Ihr wählt nur Firmen,die einzige Möglichkeit dem nicht zuzustimmen ist konsequente Wahlverweigerung! Wer nicht wählt, entzieht damit dem System die Pseudo demokratische Legitimation! Am 25.07.2012 hat das Bundesverfassungsgericht entschieden das, dass Bundeswahlgesetz ungültig ist. Zum Urteil des Zweiten Senats - 2 BvF 3/11 - 2 BvR 2670/11 - 2 BvE 9/11 htt

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @der_Revisionist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“der-Revisionist” (@der_Revisionist), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/der_Revisionist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.