Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تجربهٔ تفکر

Channel

تجربهٔ تفکر

@denkerfahr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

442subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001059899806
TypeChannel
Username@denkerfahr
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/denkerfahr

Growth

4364424395 August 2026 — 437 subscribers6 August 2026 — 436 subscribers6 August 2026 — 436 subscribers13 August 2026 — 442 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 435–443 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:06442+6
6 Aug 2026, 19:18436no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:50436-1
5 Aug 2026, 23:23437first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 442 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.9
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,063
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
330.0%
220.0%
👍220.0%
🔥110.0%
🤣110.0%
🦄110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

جالب توجه اینکه یکی از منابع ۶۱گانۀ دیپ‌سیک وبلاگ خودم است.

3🦄1

Signed محمد نورالهی

6 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC39 viewsread 6 August 2026

در جریان فلسفی پدیدارشناسی، فرانتس برنتانو و ادموند هوسرل، با وجود اشتراک در روش، پاسخ‌های متفاوتی به مسئله‌ی مبنا (اعتبار و هستی) گزاره‌های اخلاقی داده‌اند. در یک نگاه، پاسخ برنتانو بر «درستی درونی» کنش‌های عاطفی و پاسخ هوسرل بر «اعتبار عینی و نامشروط» ارزش‌ها در بستر آگاهی استعلایی تأکید دارد. در ادامه، به تفکیک به این دو دیدگاه می‌پردازیم. ### ۱. فرانتس برنتانو: بنیاد اخلاق بر «درستی درونی» عواطف برنتانو که خود

Signed محمد نورالهی

6 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC44 viewsread 6 August 2026

| مؤلفه | فرانتس برنتانو | ادموند هوسرل | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | مبنای اصلی اخلاق | «درستی درونی» (Inner Rightness) کنش‌های عاطفی | «اعتبار عینیِ نامشروط» ارزش‌ها در آگاهی استعلایی | | نقش عواطف/احساسات | بنیان و منشأ شناخت اخلاقی (عشق و تنفرِ درست) | نشانگر (نه بنیان) حقایق اخلاقی | | مبنای صدق گزاره‌ها | تجربه‌ی بی‌واسطه‌ی «درستی» کنش عاطفی (شهود عاطفی) | شهودِ ارزشی و «دیدنِ ذات» ارزش‌ها (شهود عقلانی) | | مبنای

Signed محمد نورالهی

6 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC38 viewsread 6 August 2026

پرسش از دیپ‌سیک: در جریان فلسفی پدیدارشناسی (به خصوص برنتانو و هوسرل) چه پاسخهایی به مبنای صحت و حقیقت داشتن و مبنای وجودی گزاره‌های اخلاقی داده شده است؟

Signed محمد نورالهی

6 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC42 viewsread 6 August 2026

به نام خدا در مابعدالطبیعه (هستی‌شناسی، الهیات بالمعنی الاعم) از نحوه و جایگاه وجودی هر موجود بحث می‌شود. فیلسوفانی سعی کرده اند بنیادی وجودی برای اخلاق (هنجارها، بایدها و نبایدهای رفتار انسانی) بیابند. مثلاً فرانتس برنتانو در رسالۀ خاستگاه شناخت اخلاقی درصدد تعیین جایگاهی وجودی برای اخلاق بود که من نمی‌‌دانم تا چه حد موفق شد. درمجموع اگر اخلاق که موضوعش رفتار انسان است و ذیل رفتار انسان (و با توسع خدا) قابل طرح است

Signed محمد نورالهی

6 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC54 viewsread 6 August 2026

عجب اینکه جلال آل‌احمد هم همسن من بوده که درگذشته ‌(۱۳۰۲-۱۳۴۸). فروغ فرخزاد در ۳۲ سالگی در تصادف درگذشته است (۱۳۱۴-۱۳۴۵). سهراب سپهری در ۵۲ سالگی (۱۳۰۷-۱۳۵۹) فریدریش نیچه در ۵۶ سالگی (۱۲۲۳-۱۲۷۹).

Signed محمد نورالهی

5 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC51 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @khosrowchannel

اشپنگلر در سالِ ۱۹۳۱ می نویسد: «با ظهور خردگرایی، اعتقاد به تکنیک تقریباً مذهبی ماده گرا می شود. تکنیک، همچون خدای پدر، اَبَدی و نامیرا است؛ و چون خدای پسر، بشریت را نجات می دهد؛ و (ذهن) ما را همچون خدای روح القُدس مُنوّر می کند. و ستایشگر آن، آن نافرهیختهٔ مترقیِ عصر مدرن است… ما اکنون فقط بر حسبِ اسب بخار فکر می کنیم. ما نمی توانیم به آبشاری نگاه کنیم، بدون آنکه ذهناً آن را به نیرویی الکتریکی تبدیل کنیم؛ ما نمی تو

Signed محمد نورالهی

5 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

امیدوار ام در این صوت مفصلتر خطای خاصی مرتکب نشده باشم. موضوع اصلی کم و کیف اثرگذاری مرحوم شریعتی بر جامعۀ زمان خودش است.

1

Signed محمد نورالهی

5 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC62 viewsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

Signed محمد نورالهی

5 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

خطای زبانی عجیبی کردم. در جملۀ اول گفته‌ام من دربارۀ مرحوم شریعتی کتاب نمی‌خوانم و در جملۀ دوم گفته ام من هفت-هشت کتاب دربارۀ مرحوم شریعتی خوانده ام🙂‍↕️ که منظورم از مرحوم شریعتی بود. نکتۀ دیگر اینکه طبق تذکر برادرم سیدعباس سیدمحمدی مرحوم شریعتی دو سال از سن الان من کمتر داشت که درگذشت و من اشتباه گفتم ۵۴ـ۵۵ سال. عجبا! دوسال از الان من کمتر!😳

🤣1

Signed محمد نورالهی

5 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC61 viewsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

Signed محمد نورالهی

5 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ghabl_enghelab

♻️ باید رویای ایران را کف خیابان بسازیم 🔷 اگر یادت باشد یک ادبیاتی در زمان جنگ وایرال شد، یک عده مرتب توییت می‌زدند می‌گفتند «نمیدانستیم، به ما نگفته بودند» می‌گفتند وقتی آسیب دید تازه فهمیدیم بلندترین پل خاورمیانه در ایران است. بعد بزرگ ترین پتروشیمی و بعد سایر بزرگ ترین های منطقه و بعضا جهان! 🔷 خاصیت جنگ همین است که توهمات را می‌ریزد و واقعیت‌ها را آشکار می‌کند. همین جنگ بعد از چند دهه اخبار فقر و فلاکت واقعیت دس

1👍1

Signed محمد نورالهی

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @denkerfahr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تجربهٔ تفکر” (@denkerfahr), 442 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denkerfahr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.