Channel
@datakolya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
811subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001947472791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @datakolya |
| Description | ▪️Фаундер дата консалтинга и медиа @leftjoin ▪️Пишу про данные, бизнес, продуктивность, Кипр и любовь к теннису ▪️Веду Youtube-канал www.youtube.com/@Data_Heroes |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/datakolya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 811 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 811 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
229 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 60 | 26.2% | |
| 🔥 | 50 | 21.8% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 21.0% | |
| ❤ | 46 | 20.1% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 3.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.62% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.75% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 1.31% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.873% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.873% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.437% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Metallica M72 Нам с Аней давно хотелось попасть на концерт Metallica, несмотря на то, что ребята уже, мягко говоря, немолодые. Ранее ни разу не были на их концертах, и так уж повезло, что мы попали на их рекордный по численности концерт (конечно, не сравнится с Москвой в 1991). Невероятные ощущения, когда ты подходишь к стадиону, а там уже гул и рев покруче чем на Зенит-Спартак в лучшие годы. В целом, я довольно ст…
🔥11❤4❤🔥3
Apple Watch Ultra > Whoop Отпуск от ру-контента прошел гладко, возвращаюсь к периодическому постингу. Знаю, что меня читает много успешных людей (aka вуповоды), но также знаю, что меня читают и те, кто переехал с Whoop на Apple Watch Ultra. Я кайфую от Watch Ultra последние 5 лет, и мне всего там хватает, пока что лучший девайс для меня для трекинга всего, не снимаю ночью, сплю с ними, зарядку держат хорошо, особе…
👍4🔥3
Ну че вы там как, с прокси разобрались, айтишники?
😁19👍3🔥1🤮1
LinkedIn > Telegram Причина, по которой вести телеграм-канал в 2026м году, гиблая затея. Ну, а я впереди повестки, и уже давно почти перестал это делать, тк все внимание направлено на linkedin, заходите на огонек, у меня там интересно ⚡ Кстати, сегодня отмечаю день рождения! Спасибо моей любимой жене Ане, детям, маме и всей семье, а также родственникам за то, что терпят меня и поддерживают в разных простых и не оче…
❤18🤝7🔥5🤮2🦄2
Новая реклама антропика, конечно, топчик. Видели уже? В целом, Claude, конечно, куда успешнее начинает завоевывать поляну и по работе продукта, и по маркетингу, и, самое главное, по юзкейсам. Все только и говорят про Claude Code, хотя и Cursor был неплох для вайбкодинга. Но Claude Code: а) дешевле б) реально удобнее в) очень структурировали подход к вайбкодингу и генерации кода. То есть, даже при отсутствии своег…
👍6❤4🔥4
Лед — лимон И это не про клуб из 2000х в Спб! Гениальный совет мне выдал вчера чатик, когда я советовался с ним, как и куда пристроить целый мешок лимонов, который нам подарили. Варианты: лимончелло, лимонный пирог и даже лимонный сок уже были испробованы. Хотелось сделать как-то так, чтобы лимоны не пропали. И, вот она, прекрасная идея: сделать лед из лимонного сока. Бросаешь потом такой в чай или воду, и вкусно…
👍21😁3
ИИ-разочарования В этом посте хочу поделиться своими разочарованиями в ИИ, но прежде чем сделаю это, оговорюсь, что сейчас мы активно пилотируем MCP-агентов в инжиниринге и аналитике, и в эту историю я очень верю. А вот что не так с бытовым ИИ, про который я писал ранее. Итак, 1. Plaud (тот самый «умный» диктофон) Тотальное разочарование. Я действительно пытался им пользоваться, записывал посещения к врачу, искал …
❤8👍4
Eyes 👁 > Ice 🧊 Пару недель назад были в авиаперелете с Кипра в материковую Европу и позабавил один случай. Стюард, который разносит напитки был в ситуации, когда ему не хватало льда, а в салоне самолета довольно шумно, и он попытался крикнуть стюардессе в середине борта, что ему этот лед нужен, она естественно его не услышала. Прикололо как именно он это сделал. Кричал примерно так: айс, айс, и когда осознал, что о…
😁23
Какая обложка вам нравится больше?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Всем привет! Я уже раньше упоминал, что решил выпустить адаптацию книги «Аналитика для руководителей» на английском языке. Мы уже на финишной прямой — все перевели, отредактировали (кстати, спасибо нашим бета-ридерами и всем, кто поделился фидбеком!), верстаем и готовимся выпускать. Сейчас самое сложное испытание для любого автора — выбрать обложку. Мы решили сменить название и концепт, отсмотрели сотню книг из то…
И проголосуйте за обложку!
Video, posted without a caption
🔥11👍4❤3🤬2🙉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @datakolya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая обложка вам нравится больше?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 16 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 522,352 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коля Валиотти • Дата консалтинг” (@datakolya), 811 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/datakolya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.