Channel
@dashas_notes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,056subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001854668291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dashas_notes |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dashas_notes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 1,056 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 1,058 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 1,058 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (5 January 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 98 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
225 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 174 | 77.3% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 8.89% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 4.89% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 3.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.67% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 2.22% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.444% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сила маленьких медленных шагов Long story short - примерно 1,5 месяца как я перестала думать про темп во время бега и все, что я делаю каждую тренировку - это пытаюсь бежать медленнее, снижая пульс. Пульс - моя North Star метрика в беге. 💡 Что мне это дало? Ну я была бы не я, если бы не решила это проанализировать, ниже время забегов на 10 км ➖21 июня 01:21:31 ➖5 июля 01:14:48 ➖12 июля 01:11:34 Сократила время на …
❤8
погнали в 35-й получается 🐯
❤11
Коллеги, а что по маркетингу? 19 июня иду на международный форум про перфоманс-маркетинг и рекламные системы - CPC.Forum 👀 Понравилось, что в программе кроме общих болей про дорогую рекламу, сложные лиды и удлинение цикла сделки, есть отдельные выступления про Edtech: 🔜От личного бренда преподавателя до performance-воронки: как онлайн-школе расти в конкурентном edtech 🔜Монетизация контента за пределами блога: как…
❤4
Т - традиции, год спустя Если вдруг вы переживали, обе субличности со мной, все хорошо 😅 На 3 фотографии моя лучшая поддержка на дистанции 💚
❤12
это я на вулкан поднималась, сейчас дома уже без фильтров, обработки, просто до мурашек красиво 💔
❤12❤🔥5🔥2
2 способа делать делишки, которые меня никогда почти никогда не подводят Пробовала разное, но прижились только: 1️⃣Бешеная мотивация и интерес, которые побуждают меня сделать дело здесь и сейчас 2️⃣Календарь и список дел в заметках: 📆 в календарь вношу все, что надо запланировать заранее и/или на что нужно выделить определенный слот (встречи, спорт, учеба, напоминалки об оплатах и т.п.). 📋В заметках обычно список не…
❤5🐳5😁1
Работаю сегодня с таким видом 🐯
❤15
🌷 С 8 марта Сегодня - день, когда хочется напомнить, что каждая девушка может больше! Недавно прочитала про канадскую бегунью и юриста, которая выиграла ультрамарафон, пробежав 100 км с перерывами на кормление дочери. Поэтому хочу пожелать каждой меньше сомневаться в себе, больше поддержки и сил идти своим путём 🥰
❤11👍4🔥1
14% года пройдены Задолжала вам пост про то, как планирую свой год, чем занялась полноценно только в эти выходные 🤦♀️ В январе успела 2 раза поболеть, разбить колени на теннисе, отравиться и вызвать скорую - мягко говоря, было не до системных планов 🫠 Сейчас планы составлены, в процессе использовала сразу 3 методики: 1️⃣ Накидала просто списком все «хотелки» и планы. Таким образом выгрузила голову и пока не сильн…
❤14🔥2
Кстати про просторы маркетплейсов, вот вам идея для бизнеса, не благодарите 🤪 Нравится, что на корягу даже отзывы есть) Делитесь в комментариях другими бизнес-идеями для маркетплейсов ☺️
😁19❤15👍4
Даша, давай не про работу pinned «Пока готовлю пост про то, как сама планирую год, собрала другие методы ▶️ Year compass: популярный сейчас планер, можно распечатать или заполнять онлайн. С помощью вопросов и упражнений помогает подвести итоги прошедшего года и спланировать новый. Забавно…»
Пока готовлю пост про то, как сама планирую год, собрала другие методы ▶️ Year compass: популярный сейчас планер, можно распечатать или заполнять онлайн. С помощью вопросов и упражнений помогает подвести итоги прошедшего года и спланировать новый. Забавно, что на просторах маркетплейсов видела платный вариант, хотя проект бесплатный и все материалы можно скачать ▶️Колесо баланса: подробно писала про колесо тут. Ес…
❤18👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dashas_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 819,109 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даша, давай не про работу” (@dashas_notes), 1,056 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dashas_notes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.