не, я понимаю, что работать никто не хочет, но не ахуевайте тоже, нолики и единички

Channel
Это написала Даша Паша
@dashapasha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002514088286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dashapasha |
| Description | Пишу о работе с текстами и хихикаю Маркетолог и автор |
| Created | Between 1 February 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dashapasha |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 58.5%
- avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.2
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 28.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 February 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 76 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 31
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 22 | 29.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 25.3% | |
| 🤡 | 16 | 21.3% | |
| 💅 | 12 | 16.0% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Спрашиваешь как прошло мероприятие Тебе говорят хорошо Спрашиваешь, сколько лидов получили Отвечают - 0 Уточняешь, что именно хорошо Хорошо - выступили не забыв текст и им понравилось Понятно
😁3🫡1
Мы тут недавно спрашивали, как вам романы на работе. И офигели. Какие же мы все, оказывается, в большинстве своём работуны. Прикольно, что второе место поделили два противоположных ответа. Но на два человечка всё ж таки больше тех, кому романы на работе не зашли. В комментарии пришли люди с более романтичным настроением и разрешили любовь. Вывод переписываем с Дашиного ответа: сейчас мало шансов вживую познакомиться…
💅5❤🔥3😁1
ЕБАТЬ ПРО МЕНЯ ПАША ФЕДОРОВ НАПИСАЛ А У ВАС КАК ДЕЛА
💅2❤🔥1
Интересный инсайт про технарей Я больше года плотно работаю в ИТ, больше 3 лет – в целом с узкими нишами, могу судить и осуждать ХАХАХА И почему то ВСЕМ технарям-руководителям (любого звена) важно доказывать, что они занимаются важными вещами Это не особо жизнеспособный типичный b2b saas ? Вам обеспечена часовая лекция о том как это важно и какой на это невероятный спрос (Это надо было одному отделу в одной компани…
🫡2❤🔥1
Общение с заказчиками: ⛔️🙅♀️❌Вроде это все еще в марте обсуждалось, готовили аналитику перед запусом лендинга. Вам какие-то специфические данные нужны? Для чего? 👍✅🔥Уточняющий инпут. По данному продукту в марте мы уже проводили бенчмарк по целевым сегментам юзеров и конкурентному полю, все выводы зафиксированы в аналитическом бэклоге. Параллельно был развёрнут пайплайн для пре-релиза лендинга. Сейчас, чтобы корре…
🫡2🤡1
В 8 ЛЕТ ПЛАЧЕШЬ, ЧТО НИКТО НЕ ЛЮБИТ БУКВУ Ё … УЧИШЬСЯ 11 ЛЕТ … УЧАСТВУЕШЬ В ОЛИМПИАДАХ, НАУЧНЫХ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯХ ПО ЛИТЕРАТУРЕ, ФИЛОСОФИИ И ЛИНГВИСТИКЕ … СДАЕШЬ ЕГЭ ПО ГУМАНИТАРНЫМ ПРЕДМЕТАМ НА ПЯТЕРКУ … ТЫ В РЕДКОЛЛЕГИИ СБОРНИКА ПОЭЗИИ … У ТЕБЯ НЕСКОЛЬКО ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ В НАУЧНЫХ ЖУРНАЛАХ … ПОСТУПАЕШЬ НА ЖУРФАК … ИДЕШЬ НА КРАСНЫЙ ДИПЛОМ … КАВЫЧКИ, БЛЯТЬ, СТАВИМ «ЁЛОЧКИ», “НЕ ЛАПКИ” … ДЛИННОЕ ТИРЕ — ЭТО СУКА ТВОЯ ЖИЗНЬ … ТЫ Г…
🗿1😁1
- Так, драфт готов, нужно 30 минут допилить и могу скинуть на согласование - Покажи сейчас, быстро посмотрю пока время есть -ээээээ..... Я и мои рабочие комментарии к файлам:
😁5❤🔥2💅1
Если сегодня вам ставят задачи - не верьте, это розыгрыш
🤡3😁3
Никакой помощи в этом доме! Всё CMO, всё CMO!
Моя подруга делает классный контент с ИИ. С этого я смеялась в голос. Чекните и поставьте реакцию! (И пишите @visual_shapik если вам нужен дизайнер или нейрокреатор. Есть шанс отцапать себе крутого спеца) https://t.me/syntxfamily/4306?comment=147980
❤🔥4
Эпоха журналистики в крупных авторитетных СМИ подходит к концу. Исследователи проверили тексты NYT, WSJ и Washington Post — каждый десятый материал там уже написал ИИ. И это только верхушка айсберга: была проверена лишь часть публикаций в нескольких СМИ, а что творится в остальных изданиях даже страшно считать. Журналисты стали брать «интервью» у чат-ботов вместо живых экспертов, а потом публиковать ИИ-галлюцинации …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dashapasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Это написала Даша Паша” (@dashapasha), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dashapasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.