Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ДАРУ-ННАХРЕЙН | دَارُ النَّهْرَيْنِ

@darunakhrain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

354subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002326730294
TypeChannel
Username@darunakhrain
DescriptionОснователь проекта: https://t.me/ibnramadan11 Для обратной связи: @muflih13
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/darunakhrain

Growth

3547 Aug 2026, 14:34 — 354 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:46 — 354 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:348 Aug 2026, 06:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 353–355 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:46354no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:34354first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
59
Videos
3
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8064.0%
👍2923.2%
🔥1411.2%
🤔21.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 12 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Feb 2026, 15:57 UTC247 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ibnramadan11File

Случай с Ибн Хаджар аль-Хайтами в Мекке относительно правового статуса кофе.

3👍1

12 Feb 2026, 15:57 UTC253 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ibnramadan11

Всем кофеманам советую прочесть, за одно узнаете причину такого распространения кофе ☕️))

3

13 Jan 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,720 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сбор средств на издание книги «Истигаса»: Собрано: 23 тыс Осталось: 177 тыс Реквизиты: Т-Банк 2200 7020 7702 8020 Сбер: 2202 2084 5253 8631 (Магомед Магомедов)

9

9 Jan 2026, 10:25 UTC817 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Трактат «Ма за вазифату-ль-фукаха» («Какова задача факихов?») представляет собой ценное научное послание, посвящённое вопросам исламской юриспруденции (фикха) и роли правоведов в умме. Как явствует из самого названия, шейх всесторонне исследует ключевые аспекты иджтихада и таклида, решительно опровергая необоснованные претензии тех, кто заявляет о возможности «абсолютного иджтихада» в поздний период исламской истории

8👍1

7 Jan 2026, 16:26 UTC848 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Книги издательства «Дару-н-нахрейн»: 1. Рисаля фи-ль-каваид фикхийя (Мухаммад ибн Рамадан Ад-Дагистани) https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/744649050/detail.aspx 2. Введение в Коранические науки (Мухаммад ибн Рамадан Ад-Дагистани) https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/744660377/detail.aspx 3. Такфир — обвинение в неверии. (Мухаммад ибн Рамадан Ад-Дагистани) https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/744676822/detail.aspx

8

2 Jan 2026, 07:05 UTC832 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сбор на книгу: «Истигаса — обращение за помощью» Представляем вашему вниманию исследование шейха Усмана ан-Набульси [ученика Саида Фуды], посвящённое вопросу истигасы. Текст взят из его книги «Ар-Руъятуль-ваххабийя». Изначально я планировал осветить эту тему в своей книге о такфире, но отказался от этой идеи, так как заслуживает отдельного глубокого изучения. Данная же работа раскрывает тему исчерпывающе. Убеждён,

12👍5🤔1

2 Jan 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,290 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5🤔1

27 Dec 2025, 07:39 UTC858 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Передают, что как-то раз Абу Абдуллах аль-Газзаль, да будет доволен им Аллах, сидел в своей лавке. К нему привёл мужчина своего внука и стал жаловаться на его чрезмерную склонность к играм и праздности, прося шейха вразумить и отучить мальчика от этого. Однако шейх, к удивлению присутствующих, обратился к ребёнку со словами: "Ступай, играй". Мы были изумлены: как же так, шейх не только не остановил его, но и сам пов

6

26 Dec 2025, 18:12 UTC290 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ibnramadan11

О порицаемости сна перед совершением обязательной молитвы Порицается сон до совершения молитвы после того, как её время наступило. Это касается всех молитв, даже вечерней (магриб) для того, кто намеревается совместить её с ночной ('иша) [во время дождя или в пути]. Основанием служит то, что Пророк (да благословит его Аллах и приветствует) порицал такой сон, а также опасение, что сон может затянуться и человек пропу

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @darunakhrain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДАРУ-ННАХРЕЙН | دَارُ النَّهْرَيْنِ” (@darunakhrain), 354 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darunakhrain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.