Channel
@darulhikam
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
516subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001245562992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darulhikam |
| Description | https://t.me/darulhikam 🏡 Дом мудрости и знаний - "دار الحكم" |
| Created | 1 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darulhikam |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 516 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 516 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
238 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 91 | 38.2% | |
| ⚡ | 44 | 18.5% | |
| 💯 | 41 | 17.2% | |
| ✍ | 28 | 11.8% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 10.9% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.52% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 8 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @darulhikam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 8 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
"У нас есть правило: "Чем больше знаний у человека, тем меньше у него возражений и порицаний". То есть необходимо любым способом смягчать их отношение к людям, пока человек замкнут в своей идеологии, ограничен своими представлениями и не знает ничего другого. Он даже не понимает, что существуют разногласия между учеными, разные мазхабы и различные мнения. Он убежден, что придерживается только "самого сильного мнения"…
✍6👍4⚡3
Получающий знания последовательно, в частности изучая историю фикха, усуль аль-фикх (также правила усуля и фикха), сам фикх на основе определенного мазхаба и цели шариата, не может быть такфиристом (хариджитом, хазимитом и т.п.) или джархистом (мадхалитом, хаддадитом и т.п.) - это почти исключено. Именно поэтому эти секты больше всех, а порой и практически единственные в наше время, выступают против следования мазхаб…
✍6⚡3👍3
Одним из условий иджтихада является необходимость знания обычаев и положения людей. Имам Аш-Шафии, да помилует его Аллах, подчеркивал необходимость постоянного учета изменений и развития обстоятельств. Он считал, что факих, который хотя бы на год выпал из понимания состояния и реалий рынка, не имеет права выносить фетвы по тем вопросам, от которых он оторван. Аш-Шафии говорил: "Не дозволено тому, кто знал рынок опред…
⚡6👍3💯3
"Имамом для молящихся становится тот, кто наиболее искусен в чтении Книги Всевышнего Аллаха. Нет разногласий в том, что искусное чтение Корана и знание фикха имеют преимущество перед прочими качествами. Однако возникло разногласие относительно того, какое из этих двух качеств следует предпочесть. Мазхаб имама Ахмада ибн Ханбаля, да помилует его Аллах, - отдавать предпочтение чтецу. Этого мнения придерживались также М…
❤7👍5⚡2
https://teletype.in/@aliali777/sbIboNHSu3V
👍6⚡2💯2
“Если ты видишь, что ученые завидуют друг другу и соперничают, не проявляют теплоты, дружелюбия и не поддерживают друг друга, то знай: они променяли Вечную жизнь на мирскую. Они - потерпевшие убыток”. Абу Хамид Аль-Газали в إحياء علوم الدين https://t.me/darulhikam
💯6⚡3👍3
“Обычай усулистов - разбирать вопросы полностью и тщательно, не упуская ни одной детали”. Сулейман Ат-Туфи в شرح مختصر الروضة https://t.me/darulhikam
✍5👍4💯3
“Большинство людей не проявляют терпения, чтобы удержаться от погружения в то, что их не касается, и не говорят с должной проверкой о том, во что они погружаются. И именно это испортило и религию, и мирскую жизнь. Да помилует Аллах того, кто говорит со знанием или молчит с мудрой сдержанностью”. Ибн Аль-Вазир в العواصم والقواصم https://t.me/darulhikam
⚡6👍3💯3❤1
Отписка после поста с конструктивной и научно обоснованной критикой - очищение канала.
✍4👍4💯4
Понятие сподвижника у мухаддисов и усульистов и причины их разногласия Сподвижник в терминологии ученых усуля - это тот, кто сопровождал Пророка, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, будучи верующим в него, в течение такого времени, которое обычно достаточно для того, чтобы его можно было назвать сподвижником (тем, кто его сопровождал), и умер в исламе. У мухаддисов же - это тот, кто видел Пророка, да благослов…
👍6⚡3💯3
Ибн Хаджар сказал: "Не следует обольщаться тем, что множество книг сходятся на одном и том же постановлении, ибо эта множественность может в конечном итоге восходить к одному источнику". تحفة المحتاج 1/ 39 Это, по сути, и является преобладающим положением в книгах - как ранних, так и поздних. В большинстве из них последующие авторы заимствуют у предшествующих, даже если прямо не указывают на это. https://t.me/mdras…
👍6⚡4💯2
На Западе и в Китае рабство исчезло не из-за моральных принципов, а потому, что со временем стало экономически невыгодным. Например, в Китае в период Династии Мин рабский труд нередко ограничивали. Великая китайская стена уже строилась не рабами, а мобилизованными и наемными рабочими. Причина проста: с рабов нельзя собрать налоги. Гораздо выгоднее было отпускать людей, чтобы они становились крестьянами, обрабатывали…
👍7💯4⚡3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @darulhikam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 18,025 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Darul Hikam” (@darulhikam), 516 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darulhikam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.