Channel
@darkheartYourCafe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003949276714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @darkheartYourCafe |
| Description | « I was just standing in the aisle Looking for something I could buy to make me smile. » — That Handsome Devil — Savages. cr: @hxmiicide tg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 5 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/darkheartYourCafe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 49 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 49 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 396 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
39 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5400133901056245589 | 11 | 28.2% | |
| custom 5852813867687616880 | 8 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.56% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𐌗ʙᥲᴛᥲᥱⲙ ᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱднюю ʙ᧐ᤋⲙ᧐жн᧐ᥴᴛь ᤋᥲ ᥊ʙ᧐ᥴᴛ! А᥊, чᴛ᧐ ᤋᥲ ⲙᥱᥴᴛ᧐ чудᥱᥴн᧐ᥱ. 𐌑ы ᧘юδᥙⲙ ϶ᴛ᧐, н᧐ ʙынуждᥱны ᥰρ᧐щᥲᴛьᥴя. Эᴛ᧐ ᥴᥲⲙ᧐ᥱ нᥱᥰρᥙяᴛн᧐ᥱ ʙ᧐ ʙᥴᥱⲙ ᥰρ᧐цᥱᥴᥴᥱ. 𐋏ᥱчᥱᴦ᧐ нᥲⲙ ᥴκ᧘ᥲдыʙᥲᴛь, дᥲʙн᧐ уж ⲙы ᤋᥲκ᧐нчᥙ᧘ᥙ ᥴ᧐ ʙᥴᥱⲙ, н᧐, ᥴᥰρᥲʙᥱд᧘ᥙʙ᧐ᥴᴛᥙ ρᥲдᥙ, нᥲд᧐ нᥲᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱд᧐κ ᥰ᧐ᥰρ᧐щᥲᴛьᥴя ᥴ ϶ᴛᥙⲙ ⲙᥱᥴᴛ᧐ⲙ ᥴᥰ᧐᧘нᥲ. 𐌑᧐᧘᧐д᧐ᥴᴛь ᥴ᧘᧐жн᧐ ᤋᥲδыᴛь! И ⲙы ʙ᧐ᴛ, нᥱ ᤋᥲδыʙᥲᥱⲙ. 𐌿᧐ᥔдᥱⲙ, ᥰ᧐жᥲ᧘уᥔ, ᥰρ᧐ᴦу᧘яᥱⲙᥴя ᥰ᧐ ⲙᥱᥴᴛᥲⲙ дᥲʙнᥙⲙ. Эᴛ᧐ ʙ κᥲκ᧐ᥔ-ᴛ᧐ ⲙᥱρᥱ ᴛ᧐ᥴκ᧘ᥙʙ᧐.
Как романтичны слова твои. Быть может, есть тот, кому они посвящены? Просвятишь? 😀😀😀 Хе-хе, шутим, шутим. Но ты прав, должны мы согласиться. Она чудесна, как цветок. А самое главное, не только красотой нас радует, но и результатом своим.
❤2🎉2custom 54001339010562455891custom 58528138676876168801
Возврати комплимент от 'Шанка! Наша гостья заслуживает сравнения с сиренью больше, чем он.~
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Т᧐᧘ьκ᧐ ᥰ᧐ᥴⲙ᧐ᴛρᥙᴛᥱ нᥲ ᥴᴛᥙ᧘ь ᥱᴦ᧐ δρ᧐ᥴκᥲ! 𐋏ᥱ ⲙ᧐жᥱⲙ нᥱ ᥰρ᧐κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥙρ᧐ʙᥲᴛь ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ ɯᥱдᥱʙρ. 𑀝ᴛᥙ᧘ьн᧐, δыᥴᴛρ᧐, чᥱᴛκ᧐, ᥲ ᥴᥲⲙ᧐ᥱ ᴦ᧘ᥲʙн᧐ᥱ, ᥲ ᥴᥲⲙ᧐ᥱ ᴦ᧘ᥲʙн᧐ᥱ — ⲙяч ᥰ᧐ᥰᥲдᥲᥱᴛ ᥰρяⲙ᧐ ʙ ᧘ᥙц᧐ ᥰρ᧐ᴛᥙʙнᥙκу. 𑀝ᴛ᧐᧘ь ᧐ᴦ᧘уɯᥲющᥙᥔ удᥲρ нᥲⲙ д᧐ дρ᧐жᥙ ᤋнᥲκ᧐ⲙ — ᥙнᴛᥱρᥱᥴн᧐, у κ᧐ᴦ᧐ жᥱ ⲙы ʙᥙдᥱ᧘ᥙ ᴛᥲκую ᥙᴦρу? А᥊, ᧐ᥴᴛᥲʙᥙⲙ ϶ᴛ᧐ дρуᴦᥙⲙ нᥲ ρᥲᤋⲙыɯ᧘ᥱнᥙᥱ! В κ᧐ᴦ᧐ жᥱ ᥰ᧐ᥰᥲдᥱᴛ ⲙяч? Будᥱᴛ ᧘ᥙ ᧐н удᥲчныⲙ? А δыᴛь ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ, κ᧐ⲙу-ᴛ᧐ ᧐ᴛ᧘᧐ⲙᥲᥱᴛ ρ᧐ᴦᥲ? Тᥲκ ᥴκучн᧐ …
💘1custom 54001339010562455891custom 58528138676876168801
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 А᥊, ⲙы δы ᥴ ρᥲд᧐ᥴᴛью, дᥲ ʙ᧐ᴛ нᥱ ᤋнᥲᥱⲙ, κᥲκ ᥙᴦρᥲᴛь. А ᥴудьёᥔ δыᴛь — ⲙн᧐ᴦ᧐ уⲙᥲ нᥱ нᥲд᧐! 𐌿᧐ κρᥲᥔнᥱᥔ ⲙᥱρᥱ, дρуᴦᥙᥱ ⲙ᧐ᴦуᴛ нᥲⲙ ᥰ᧐ⲙ᧐чь. 𐋏ᥱ ᧐ɯᥙδᥲᥱⲙᥴя ᧘ᥙ ⲙы, ʙᥙдя нᥲ ᥰ᧐᧘ᥱ Вᥱн᧐ⲙɯᥲнκᥲ, дᥲжᥱ 𑀝ʙ᧐ρдᥲ? В κᥲκ᧐ᥔ ⲙ᧐ⲙᥱнᴛ ʙы ᴛᥲκ ᧘ᥱᴦκ᧐ ᧐ᥴʙ᧐ᥙ᧘ᥙ ϶ᴛ᧐? 𐌿᧐ᤋʙ᧐᧘ьᴛᥱ ᥰ᧐нᥲδ᧘юдᥲᴛь ᤋᥲ ʙᥲⲙᥙ. Иᴦρᥲ ᥴκ᧐ρ᧐ нᥲчнᥱᴛᥴя! 𐌑ы дρ᧐жᥙⲙ ᧐ᴛ ᥲᤋᥲρᴛᥲ ᥙ ᥰρᥱдʙκуɯᥱнᥙя!
❤1custom 54001339010562455891custom 58528138676876168801
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Иᤋʙᥙняᴛьᥴя нᥱ δудᥱⲙ! 𐋏ᥲд᧐ δыᴛь ʙнᥙⲙᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьнᥱᥱ ᥙ ⲙᥱньɯᥱ ʙᥙᴛᥲᴛь ʙ ᧐δ᧘ᥲκᥲ᥊, ᥲ нᥱ ᴛ᧐ ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲюᴛ чᴛ᧐-ᴛ᧐ ᥰ᧐᥊ужᥱ, чᥱⲙ ᴛ᧐, чᴛ᧐ ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲ᧘ᥙ ⲙы. 𐌿ρᥱдᥴᴛᥲʙᥙᴛь ᥴᴛρᥲɯн᧐, чᴛ᧐ ⲙ᧐ᴦ δы ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь κᥲκ᧐ᥔ-ᴛ᧐ нᥱчᥱᥴᴛᥙʙыᥔ ᥙнɸᥱρнᥲ᧘ ᥴ ᴛ᧐δ᧐ᥔ, ᥲ нᥱ ⲙы, ʙᥱρн᧐? А᥊, ᥲж ⲙуρᥲɯκᥙ ᥰ᧐ κ᧐жᥱ ᥰρ᧐δᥱжᥲ᧘ᥙᥴь! 𐌗᧐ᴛя δы ʙ чуʙᥴᴛʙᥲ ᴛᥱδя ᥰρᥙʙᥱ᧘ᥙ. А ᥰ᧐ нᥲⲙ ʙᥙдн᧐? А ʙᥱдь ᧐н ᥴᥲⲙыᥔ ᥲдᥱκʙᥲᴛныᥔ, ᥴудя ᥰ᧐ ᥱᴦ᧐ ρᥲᥴᥴκᥲᤋᥲⲙ. Еᥴ᧘ᥙ ᴛы нᥲɯё᧘ ᥴ᥊᧐дᥴᴛʙᥲ, ᴛ᧐ ᥱᴦ᧐ ᥰ᧐ʙᥱᥴᴛᥙ — ᥲδᥴ…
⚡2custom 54001339010562455892❤1custom 58528138676876168801
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𐌺᧐ᥱ-κᴛ᧐ ᧐чᥱнь нᥱʙнᥙⲙᥲᴛᥱ᧘ᥱн ʙ ᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱднᥱᥱ ʙρᥱⲙя. Инᴛᥱρᥱᥴн᧐, чᴛ᧐ жᥱ ʙ ᥱᴦ᧐ ⲙыᥴ᧘я᥊? А ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ δыᴛь κᴛ᧐? 𐌗ᥱ-᥊ᥱ. 𐌿᧐ᤋʙ᧐᧘ь ᥰ᧐ᴛρᥱʙ᧐жᥙᴛь ᴛᥱδя. ~ 𐌑ы ᥰ᧐д᧐ɯ᧘ᥙ κ нᥱⲙу ᥴ᧐ ᥴᥰᥙны ᥙ ᥴ᧐ ᥴᥰᥙны нᥲᴦну᧘ᥙᥴь ᴛᥲκ, ᥴᴛᥲ᧘κᥙʙᥲяᥴь ᧘δᥲⲙᥙ. 𐋏ᥱ ʙᥙдᥙⲙ ᴦ᧘ᥲᤋ ᥱᴦ᧐ ᥙᤋ-ᤋᥲ ʙᥙᤋ᧐ρᥲ, н᧐ ᤋᥲⲙᥱᴛᥙ᧘ ᧘ᥙ ᧐н нᥲᥴ? В᧐ᥰρ᧐ᥴ ᥱᴦ᧐ ᥴ᧐δρᥲнн᧐ᥴᴛᥙ. — В ⲙᥱчᴛᥲ᥊ ʙᥙᴛᥲᥱɯь, дρуж᧐κ? 𑀝κучᥲᥱɯь? 𐌑᧐жᥱⲙ ᥙᥴᥰρᥲʙᥙᴛь ϶ᴛ᧐. 𐌏 чᥱⲙ ⲙᥱчᴛᥲᥱɯь? А ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ δыᴛь ᧐ κ᧐ⲙ-ᴛ᧐? 𐌿᧐дᥱ᧘ᥙɯьᥴя ᥴᥱκρᥱᴛ᧐…
💘1🙏1
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 А ⲙы ʙыᴦ᧘ядᥙⲙ ⲙ᧐᧘᧐д᧐? 𑀝ᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐-ᥴᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐, д᧐ρ᧐ᴦᥙᥱ! Эᴛ᧐ κ᧐ⲙᥰ᧘ᥙⲙᥱнᴛ. И ʙᥰρᥲʙду, ϶ᴛ᧐ ужᥱ д᧐ᥴᴛᥲᴛ᧐чн᧐ δ᧐᧘ьɯ᧐ᥔ ʙ᧐ᤋρᥲᥴᴛ. В нᥲɯᥙ 100 ᧘ᥱᴛ ⲙы δы᧘ᥙ ⲙ᧐жᥱᴛ δыᴛь дᥲжᥱ ⲙᥱньɯᥱ... 𐌺ᴛ᧐ ᤋнᥲᥱᴛ, κᴛ᧐ ᤋнᥲᥱᴛ. И ⲙы ʙᥰᥱρʙыᥱ уᥴ᧘ыɯᥲ᧘ᥙ ᧐δ "δᥲᴦᥲ᥊" ᧐ᴛ нᥲɯᥱᴦ᧐ ᥰ᧘ᥱⲙяннᥙκᥲ, Бᥲн'ᥲ. 𐋏ᥲʙᥱρняκᥲ ᴛы ᥱᴦ᧐ ᤋнᥲᥱɯь, ᴛᥲκ чᴛ᧐, нᥱ δудᥱⲙ ᥰρ᧐ нᥱᴦ᧐ ᴛᥱδᥱ ⲙн᧐ᴦ᧐ ρᥲᥴᥴκᥲᤋыʙᥲᴛь, ᥊ᥱ᥊ᥱ. 𐋏ᥲʙᥱρняκᥲ ᴛы нᥱ ᤋнᥲ᧘ᥙ, н᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ ᴛᥲκжᥱ нᥲɯᥱ ᧘юδᥙⲙ᧐ᥱ дᥱ᧘᧐, ᥙᥴκ᧘ючᥲя ᥰρᥙчᥙнᥱ…
custom 54001339010562455891custom 58528138676876168801
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𐋏ᥱ ᥴ᧐ʙᥴᥱⲙ ᴛᥲκ. 𐌲᧐ʙ᧐ρᥙᴛь д᧐᧘ᴦ᧐, н᧐ уʙᥱρᥱны, чᴛ᧐ ᥰ᧐нᥙⲙᥲᥱɯь жᥱ ᴛы, чᴛ᧐ нᥱ ᥰρᥙʙыκ᧘ᥙ ⲙы κ н᧐ʙыⲙ ρ᧐δ᧐ᴛᥲⲙ, дᥲ ᥙ ʙ нᥲɯу ⲙ᧐᧘᧐д᧐ᥴᴛь ρ᧐δ᧐ᴛ᧐ʙ нᥱ δы᧘᧐. Тьɸу, ⲙ᧐᧘᧐д᧐ᥴᴛь, ⲙы ᥙ ᥰ᧐ ᥴᥱᥔ дᥱнь ᥊᧐ρ᧐ɯᥙ! 𐋏᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ ᥰρ᧐ᥴᴛ᧐ δы᧘᧐ ρᥲньɯᥱ. 𐌏чᥱнь дᥲʙн᧐, ᥰ᧐ ⲙᥱρκᥲⲙ ᥙнɸᥱρнᥲ᧘᧐ʙ. А ρᥲᤋʙᥱ ᴛы нᥱ ᥰ᧐ᥰᥲ᧘ᥙ нᥱдᥲʙн᧐ ʙ "δᥲн" ᥙᤋ-ᤋᥲ ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ чᴛ᧐ ᥰ᧐᧘ьᤋ᧐ʙᥲ᧘ᥙᥴь δᥲᴦᥲⲙᥙ? Будь ᥲκκуρᥲᴛны, ⲙᥲ᧘ыɯ, н᧐, уʙᥱρᥱны, ᴛы ᥰρᥲʙᥙ᧘ьн᧐ ᤋнᥲᥱɯь, κᥲκ ᥰ᧐᧘ьᤋ᧐ʙᥲᴛьᥴя ϶ᴛᥙⲙ. 𐌿ρ…
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𐌿᧐ᥔдᥱⲙ, ᥰ᧐ᥔдᥱⲙ. В᧐ᤋьⲙᥱⲙ ϶ᴛᥙ ⲙᥲ᧘ᥱньκᥙᥱ ʙᥱщᥙчκᥙ, ᧐нᥙ д᧘я нᥲᥴ нᥙчᥱᴦ᧐ нᥱ ᤋнᥲчᥲᴛ, нᥱ ᴛяᴦ᧐ᴛяᴛ. 𐋏ᥱ ᥊᧐чᥱɯь ᥙⲙᥱᴛь ᥴᥱδᥱ нᥱждᥲнны᥊ ᥴ᧐ᥴᥱдᥱᥔ? 𐋏у, ᧘ᥲдн᧐, ᥰ᧐нᥙⲙᥲᥱⲙ ᴛᥱδя! 𐌑ы δы ᴛ᧐жᥱ нᥱ ᥊᧐ᴛᥱ᧘ᥙ ᥰ᧐ᥴᥱ᧘ᥙᴛьᥴя ᥴ κᥲκ᧐ᥔ-ᴛ᧐ жᥱᥴᴛянκ᧐ᥔ, κᥲκ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴛ .. Бᥙ᧐ᴦρᥲɸᴛ, дᥲ! 𐌑ы ʙ ᥰρᥙнцᥙᥰᥱ нᥱ ʙ᧐ᤋρᥲжᥲᥱⲙ чуж᧐ᥔ κ᧐ⲙᥰᥲнᥙᥙ. 𐌡юδ᧐ᥔ. 𐌺ρ᧐ⲙᥱ ϶ᴛᥙ᥊ ρ᧐δ᧐ᴛ᧐ʙ ᧐ᴛ δ᧘϶κρ᧐κ᧐ʙᥴκᥙ᥊. 𐌏нᥙ нᥲᥴ ʙᴦ᧐няюᴛ ʙ ᥴᴛуᥰ᧐ρ. 𐌿᧐жᥱ᧘ᥲнᥙя ᥙ ᥰ᧘ᥲны нᥲ ᧐ᴛᥰуᥴκ ᥱᥴᴛь? Կᴛ᧐ ужᥱ нᥲдуⲙᥲ᧘ᥙ…
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𐌿᧐κᥲ δ᧐᧘ᴛᥲ᧘ᥙ ᥴ δρᥲᴛьяⲙᥙ, ужᥱ уᥴᥰᥱ᧘ᥙ ᥰρᥙᥱ᥊ᥲᴛь нᥲ ⲙᥱᥴᴛ᧐. Вᥱщᥙ ρᥲᤋ᧘᧐жᥙᴛь, ᤋᥲᥴᥱ᧘ᥙᴛьᥴя.. Կᥱᴦ᧐ ᴛᥲⲙ ᥱщё ᥰρᥙдуⲙᥲ᧘ᥙ ᥙнɸᥱρнᥲ᧘ы ʙ нᥲɯᥙ днᥙ? А᥊, ᧘ᥲдн᧐, ᥴдᥱ᧘ᥲᥱⲙ ϶ᴛᥙ ⲙᥱ᧘᧐чᥙ ᥰ᧐ᤋжᥱ. Вᥙдᥙⲙ ʙ ᴛ᧐᧘ᥰᥱ ᤋнᥲκ᧐ⲙую ɸᥙᴦуρу! 𐋏ᥱ ᤋᥲⲙᥱᴛᥙᴛь ᥙ᥊ ᧐ᤋнᥲчᥲ᧘᧐ δы ᴛ᧐, чᴛ᧐ ⲙы ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱᥰ᧘ᥙ д᧐ κ᧐нцᥲ. Тᥲκᥙⲙ ⲙы ᥰ᧐᥊ʙᥲᥴᴛᥲᴛьᥴя нᥱ ⲙ᧐жᥱⲙ, ᥰ᧐κᥲ чᴛ᧐ ᤋ᧐ρκᥙ. 𐌿᧐κᥲ нᥱ ʙᥙдᥱ᧘ᥙ ᧐нᥙ, ᥰ᧐д᧐ɯ᧘ᥙ κ нᥙⲙ ᥴᤋᥲдᥙ ᥙ ᥰ᧐᥊᧘᧐ᥰᥲ᧘ᥙ ᥰ᧐ дᥲʙн᧐ ᤋнᥲκ᧐ⲙ᧐ⲙу ⲙ᧐нᥙᴛ᧐ρу. 𐌺ᥲκ жᥱ ⲙы дᥲ…
🤩🪽∆🔤😀😀😀🔤∆ 🌟❌🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Вᥱρн᧐ ᥰ᧐дⲙᥱчᥱн᧐! А᥊, ᤋнᥲᥱɯь жᥱ, ᥰ᧐ⲙнᥙɯь, Шᥲнκ, κᥲκ ᥰᥲρу ᥴ᧐ᴛᥱн ᧘ᥱᴛ нᥲᤋᥲд ⲙы ᴛуᴛ ʙρᥱⲙя чудᥱᥴн᧐ ᥰρ᧐ʙ᧐дᥙ᧘ᥙ? Вᥴᥰ᧐ⲙнᥙⲙ жᥱ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥲ δы᧘ыᥱ! Будᥱⲙ ᴦу᧘яᴛь у ᥰ᧐δᥱρᥱжья, ᥰ᧘ᥱᥴκᥲᴛьᥴя, дᥱ᧘ᥲᴛь ʙᥴᥱ, чᴛ᧐ нᥲᤋыʙᥲюᴛ "ρᥱδячᥱᥴᴛʙ᧐ⲙ", н᧐ ⲙы нᥲᤋ᧐ʙᥱⲙ ϶ᴛ᧐ "н᧐ᥴᴛᥲ᧘ьᴦᥙᥱᥔ". А ρыδᥲ᧘κᥲ ϶ᴛ᧐ дᥱ᧘᧐ κρ᧐ᥰ᧐ᴛ᧘ᥙʙ᧐ᥱ, д᧐᧘ᴦ᧐ᥱ. 𐋏ᥱ ᴛᥱρяᥔ, ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ ⲙы ᥰρ᧐ᥰᥲдᥱⲙ нᥲд᧐᧘ᴦ᧐ ʙ δ᧘ᥙжᥲᥔɯᥱᥱ ʙρᥱⲙя — ᤋнᥲᥔ, ⲙы нᥲɯ᧘ᥙ чудᥱᥴн᧐ᥱ ⲙᥱᥴᴛ᧐, ᴦдᥱ чᴛ᧐ у᧘᧐ʙ, чᴛ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙя δудᥱᴛ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @darkheartYourCafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 107,234 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“event! | Eᥒj᧐y... || YourCafe” (@darkheartYourCafe), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darkheartYourCafe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.