Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CDT DFC

@darkfemcrew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

79subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001803266167
TypeChannel
Username@darkfemcrew
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/darkfemcrew

Growth

7910 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 79 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:23 — 79 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:0110 Aug 2026, 20:23
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:2379no change
10 Aug 2026, 10:0179first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
474.7%
avg views ÷ 79 subscribers
Avg views / post
375
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (23 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total750
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

293 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54361601984042200545819.8%
custom 54678076735147486773110.6%
custom 5440745681583089969248.19%
custom 5262708485321141008217.17%
custom 5841276619162914467206.83%
custom 5222300350668615213155.12%
custom 5245000708821891717155.12%
custom 5323727734235478424134.44%
custom 5389065005830255597134.44%
custom 5217683823466131846124.10%
custom 5897839229622292551113.75%
custom 5355260404870162127103.41%
custom 521527062307643788993.07%
custom 529626142267252527782.73%
custom 544043269443134038182.73%
custom 532348488819462713351.71%
custom 535735731527825384651.71%
custom 626906673491791486351.71%
custom 536166857768020562141.37%
custom 543630282567818504641.37%
2 further kinds20.683%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC250 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⠀ 🤩 ⲁⲏⲟⲏⲥ ⲡⲁⳝⲗυⲕⲁ 🤩 тут там тут или там ИЛИ ЖЕ THIS & THAT STRAY KIDS ᥈𐔖ⲕᥲцυя ⲇ᥈я ⲕ𐔖ⲫᥱ ᥈юⳝυⲧᥱ᥈ᥱύ ☕️ : Никольская улица (у света) ⲃρᥱⲙя 🤩 : 18-20; завтра

custom 52962614226725252778custom 53616685776802056214custom 54363028256781850464custom 53684850816209789101

15 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC500 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

⠀ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍

custom 54361601984042200548custom 54678076735147486775custom 52176838234661318463custom 54404326944313403811custom 54407456815830899691

9 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC592 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Can't let you kill my vibe, ✨ ✨ 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓’𝐒 𝐀 𝐍𝐎 𝐍𝐎 новый июльский кавер на канале!!! все переходим и активим 🌞 (прекрасное закатное солнце сопровождало наш танец)) 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍

custom 54361601984042200546custom 54407456815830899694custom 58412766191629144673

9 Jul 2026, 13:04 UTC246 views32 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 𝑻𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑬𝑹 𝑷𝑯𝑶𝑻𝑶 🤩🤩 태생이 그래 난 흥이 넘쳐 열일곱 살인데 뭐 그래봤자? 노느라 바빠 밀린 내 답장 Well made, 걱정이 분에 넘쳐 🤩 🧡Mal 𝖳𝖧𝖠𝖳’𝖲 𝖠 𝖭𝖮 𝖭𝖮 Yuna 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🦋 ph. by @mileshkaas

custom 544074568158308996911custom 54361601984042200549custom 54678076735147486779custom 52176838234661318461custom 53552604048701621271custom 54404326944313403811

9 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC89 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 𝑻𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑬𝑹 𝑷𝑯𝑶𝑻𝑶 🤩🤩 Ooh) Ah-ya-ya-ya-ya (Ha) Oh-oh (Ooh) Ah-ya-ya-ya-ya Do what I want, say what I wanna (Ooh) Ah-ya-ya-ya-ya (Ha) Oh-oh (Ooh) Ah-ya-ya-ya-ya 🤩 🧡Millik 𝖳𝖧𝖠𝖳’𝖲 𝖠 𝖭𝖮 𝖭𝖮 ⠀ Chaeryeong 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🦋 ph. by @mileshkaas

custom 53552604048701621279custom 54361601984042200549custom 58412766191629144679

9 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC189 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 𝑻𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑬𝑹 𝑷𝑯𝑶𝑻𝑶 🤩🤩 Woah, move up faster, faster Woah, gettin' louder, louder Woah, 즐거웠으면 돼, that's all 거기까지, don't ask no questions 🌊 🧡ViVi 𝖳𝖧𝖠𝖳’𝖲 𝖠 𝖭𝖮 𝖭𝖮 Ryujin 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🦋 ph. by @mileshkaas

custom 52176838234661318468custom 54407456815830899698custom 58412766191629144678

9 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC126 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 𝑻𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑬𝑹 𝑷𝑯𝑶𝑻𝑶 🤩🤩 혹시 내가 무너지길 바랐다면 안타깝지만 that's no, I'm sorry I'm gonna keep singing, I'm gonna keep dancing 🌸 🧡Barbara 𝖳𝖧𝖠𝖳’𝖲 𝖠 𝖭𝖮 𝖭𝖮 Lia 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🦋 ph. by @mileshkaas

custom 54361601984042200548custom 54678076735147486777custom 54404326944313403816custom 53552796291437782381custom 53890650058302555971

9 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC81 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 𝑻𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑬𝑹 𝑷𝑯𝑶𝑻𝑶 🤩🤩 Hit that thang like a drum, ta-ta Rum-pa-pa-pum, pa-pa-pum-pa-pa 밤새워, 밤새워, 춤을 춰 내 몸이 착착, 리듬을 타, 타 🤩 🧡Milka 𝖳𝖧𝖠𝖳’𝖲 𝖠 𝖭𝖮 𝖭𝖮 Yeji 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🦋 ph. by @mileshkaas

custom 543616019840422005410custom 53890650058302555979custom 54678076735147486778

8 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC77 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

new era !!!

custom 54361601984042200548custom 53890650058302555973custom 54678076735147486772

1 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC244 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌟🌟 Just look at me 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 А наш кавер уже на канале!! скорее переходите, ставьте 💙 и пишите 💬

custom 52223003506686152136custom 52450007088218917176custom 52627084853211410085

1 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC148 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐🫐 𝑇𝐸𝐴𝑆𝐸𝑅 𝑃𝐻𝑂𝑇𝑂 ➖➖ 🌑 ➖➖ 𝑻𝑨𝑺𝑻𝑬 ➖ 𝑺𝑻𝑹𝑨𝒀 𝑲𝑰𝑫𝑺 Varya dancing for Felix 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𝘑𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘦, 𝘣𝘢𝘣𝘺, 𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 🌟🌟 ph. by @mileshkaas

custom 52627084853211410086custom 53237277342354784245custom 62690667349179148635

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @darkfemcrew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 219,433 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CDT DFC” (@darkfemcrew), 79 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/darkfemcrew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.