Никто не хочет снять мне фанкам мб, ну вдруг пожалуйста пожалуйста

Channel
𝚅𝚒𝚟í
@ViviChronicles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
89subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001862571498 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ViviChronicles |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ViviChronicles |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 89 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 88 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 95.4%
- avg views ÷ 89 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 84.9
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 8.96%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 849 |
| Reactions total | 58 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 18s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449846996456191284 | 17 | 29.3% | |
| custom 5420100512525602253 | 12 | 20.7% | |
| custom 5346161331969989368 | 8 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5251654012595363475 | 7 | 12.1% | |
| custom 5344054556022023834 | 6 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5251449365993641950 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| custom 5217422036619506133 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5251259223496481344 | 2 | 3.45% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⠀ 🤩 ⲁⲏⲟⲏⲥ ⲡⲁⳝⲗυⲕⲁ 🤩 тут там тут или там ИЛИ ЖЕ THIS & THAT STRAY KIDS ᥈𐔖ⲕᥲцυя ⲇ᥈я ⲕ𐔖ⲫᥱ ᥈юⳝυⲧᥱ᥈ᥱύ ☕️ : Никольская улица (у света) ⲃρᥱⲙя 🤩 : 18-20; завтра
А еще, когда на нас наезжают из за того что у нас закончился лед, это мое любимое шоу. Реакция такая, будто мы в этом виноваты. Я, когда стою на кассе и сообщаю об этом, я сразу указываю на то, что мы ничего сделать не можем, у нас поставщик не личный, и мы не можем сказать когда привезут, но буквально, мне говорят что это плохо, что мы хотели холодное. Я понимаю, жарко и тд, но у нас объявляется об отсутствии льда …
custom 52174220366195061332custom 52514493659936419501custom 53440545560220238341custom 54201005125256022531
Я после того как попала в общепит поняла насколько люди могут быть тупыми, не уметь входить в положение, не иметь терпения и тд. Я все понимаю друзья, когда мы приходим в какое то заведение, мы ждем хорошее обслуживание, быстрое приготовление и хорошее качество, НО, пожалуйста, мы все люди. Когда приходят, видят большую очередь, а потом нервно требуют напиток, извините пожалуйста, вы чего хотите? После этого я еще в…
custom 54498469964561912846custom 52512592234964813442custom 52516540125953634752custom 53440545560220238341
Posted without readable text
Я с ума схожу
custom 54498469964561912842
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54201005125256022532
Video, posted without a caption
just call me J.Y.Papi попробовали эти ваши модные десерты. шняга это все, не стоит того 😶
custom 52516540125953634755custom 53440545560220238344custom 54201005125256022534
Люблю неожиданные походы куда то
custom 52514493659936419503custom 53461613319699893683custom 54498469964561912843
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54498469964561912846custom 53461613319699893685custom 54201005125256022535
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ViviChronicles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 978,691 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝚅𝚒𝚟í” (@ViviChronicles), 89 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ViviChronicles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.