Channel
@danikrass
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
915subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002999029055 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @danikrass |
| Description | Админ сетки тг каналов INFLOW. Серийный HRD в геймдеве и IT. О себе, работе и красоте мира. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/danikrass |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 915 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 915 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 December 2025 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 245 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
544 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 276 | 50.7% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 19.5% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 12.7% | |
| 😁 | 43 | 7.90% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 4.60% | |
| 🥰 | 25 | 4.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 544reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @danikrass. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 December 2025 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Лето перевалило уже пару недель назад через свой воображаемый экватор и пора бы уже подвести итоги:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Всем привет! Во первых хочу поздравить всех нас - мы дожили до лета и не порвались) Дальше будет много солнца, смеха, любви и новых открытий. Даже если вы в поиске работы или своего человека для жизни - расслабьтесь и просто позвольте этому хорошему случиться с вами. Больше доверия к жизни! Люблю и обнимаю вас ♥️
❤34🔥10👍2
От моего бородатого лица и от лица команд INFLOW и F.A.C.T.S поздравляем лучшую, самую умную, красивую и достойную часть человечества. Девочки, девушки, женщины, мамы, сестры, тетушки, жёнушки, бабулечки, подруженьки, коллеженьки. Милые, любимые, дорогие, ненаглядные Солнышки и чудесницы наши. Пусть у вас все сложится и сбудется хорошо! Пусть ничего не болит и все радует. Пусть всего и на все хватает) Пусть ничто не …
❤24🥰10👏5
Вот и дожили мы до весны :) Открыта запись на консультации на март. Идя на встречу ищущим, я предлагаю так же вариант без месячного сопровождения (предложения вакансий, которые будут попадаться сами)- просто общаемся час с разбором вашего кейса и резюме. Такой вариант - стоит 5к рублей. Запись так же у @courieruz - если Настя не отвечает в @cvflow тоже пишите @courieruz - просто спросить в сообщениях канала так же …
❤6👍4🔥4
Friendly reminder: Опубликовать свое резюме бесплатно можно в @cvflow смотрите как оформлены другие объявления и отправляйте Насте, ее контакт в био канала.
🔥4👍3👏2
Открыта запись на консультации на вторую половину февраля. Если вам только спросить - у канала есть возможность отправить сообщение - БЕСПЛАТНО. Через пару дней обновлю статусы по позициям которые готов взять на сопровождение как агент по поиску работы. Всем хорошего дня!
👍7🔥6🥰3
Про день всех влюбленных и гендерные праздники. Дорогие читатели, друзья, бывшие коллеги - будьте здоровы, сохраняйте в душе мир, помогайте ближним, любите и будьте любимы, пусть все хорошее чего мы достойны встречает взаимность. Желаю вам найти своих людей, свое дело, свое место в этом мире. Желаю всем нам оставаться хорошими, добрыми людьми каждый день. Этот мир начинается с нас. Дарите тепло, внимание и подарки …
❤23👍4🥰4
Про телеграм - мы уже проходили один раз его блокировку и все еще здесь. Линкедин в России не грузится и мы все еще там. Захочешь рилзы смотреть, тиктоки и шортсы - и вот ты уже нашел как. Обидно только что страдают обычные люди, которые ориентировали свои бизнес коммуникации и личную переписку с родными на тг и теперь им неудобно, как стало неудобно старикам в вацап. Позвоните им - скажите что любите и у вас все в п…
❤28👍9🥰1
За последний месяц ко мне дважды приходили с предложением пообщаться на позицию HRD. Компании я называть не буду. В обоих случаях на момент обращения HRD или не было и ребята типа только доросли, либо он только что вышел и надо подхватить. В обоих случаях я прежде чем серьезно обдумывать возможные предложения наводил справки - уточнял как фаундеры относятся к своим командам, есть ли соц пакеты, что в них входит, усло…
❤34🔥12👍11
Дженерал отказ в 2026) "Спасибо, что откликнулись на вакансию в компания. К сожалению, мы не готовы пригласить вас на следующие этапы в данный момент. {{сообщение_об_отказе}} «Напишите тёплое, но общее письмо с отказом, которое звучит вежливо, но твердо. Не указывайте конкретные причины отказа. Дайте кандидату почувствовать, что его серьезно рассматривали, даже если это не так. Не забудьте использовать переменные …
😁43❤6👍5
Сегодня мой бывший сотрудник и подчиненный после 4 месяцев ежедневных поисков работы получил вкусный офер. Вкусный по условиям, с интересными задачами и вызовами в новой для него продуктовой нише. И не успели мы с ним обсудить этот эпизод и порадоваться как тут же его зовут на последний этап во вторую компанию. И друг (а я дружу со своими людьми) снова звонит чтобы об меня немного подумать. Сейчас он в процессе приня…
❤24👍15🔥5
Мой приятель Каджик, к слову очень толковый фронтенд и очень приятный в жизни человек, запустил свой агрегатор вакансий @ITjobsFeed
👍2👏2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @danikrass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Лето перевалило уже пару недель назад через свой воображаемый экватор и пора бы уже подвести итоги:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 165,856 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Красильников Данил” (@danikrass), 915 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/danikrass.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.