Channel
@d1van_anal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
140subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002015419557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @d1van_anal |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 3 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/d1van_anal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 140 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 141 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 141 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 43.7% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 18.3% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.3% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 7.04% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 1.41% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2024 to 14 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Спартак сегодня скорее выиграл, чем Оренбург проиграл. Во втором тайме команду Абаскаля будто заменили - почти все игроки на поле выдали лучший отрезок за последние три игры. Не такой большой объем матчей для анализа - но все таки на характере команда смогла забить три мяча, и забрать волевую победу. Понравилось, как действовали Угальде и Бабич. Зиньковский провел один из самых ярких матчей в карьере, но брака было…
🔥4🙏2
Отменяем чемоданы! Все на Никольскую!
Интересно, чемодан у Абаскаля уже собран?
❗️ Промеса арестовали в Дубае по запросу прокуратуры Нидерландов Об этом сообщило издание De Telegraaf со ссылкой на релиз голландской стороны. В нем указано, что в ОАЭ задержали 32-летнего мужчину, проживающего в Москве. Ситуацию для Матч ТВ прокомментировал бывший генеральный директор «Спартака» Евгений Мележиков: «При меньших рисках в прошлом году мною было принято решение его не брать! Мне сейчас нечего добави…
Ладно, эти прогнозы не работают. Завтра будут новые.
😁3
У Ивича, в принципе, есть много вариантов сейчас
😁8🤣1
Прогнозы на кубок Руси! Химки - Краснодар Краснодар и Ивич должны показать, что за зиму не сдулись. Проход Краснодара дальше, но обе забьют. ЦСКА - Ростов Ростов смотрелся в РПЛ круто. В первом матче было 1-1, взял бы проход Ростова, и меньше 3,5 в основное время.
👍1
Макс КБ Телега пишет, что Спартак уволит Абаскаля в случае поражения от Оренбурга. Но ведь шансы выиграть титул все равно останутся - кажется мы забываем, что истинный путь к Кубку - это Путь Регионов.
Лужники сегодня были новые. А баннеры у меня для вас только старые.
❤6👍2🙏1
Мозес конечно, если бы хотел играть - вертел бы всю РПЛ. Жалко, что играть он не хочет. Ну и желтая за симуляцию - демонстрирует, насколько он вообще считает себя сильнее и выше уровня этой лиги. Если добавить желания, так бы и было. Правда Мозеса бы тогда наверное в РПЛ и не было.
❤5👍2
В чем проблема Спартака? Пишите в комментарии 👇🏻 Пруцев и Мартинс привезли по голу. В атаке ничего так и не склеилось. Увольняем Абаскаля или проблема все таки не в испанце?
С каждым эпизодом «Спартак» делает всё больнее. Не хочется ругаться, но хочется.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @d1van_anal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@d1van_anal named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Диванная аналитика” (@d1van_anal), 140 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d1van_anal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.