Channel
@cyberwave_sec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
398subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002414252369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberwave_sec |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberwave_sec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 398 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 397 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 397 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
360 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 131 | 36.4% | |
| ❤ | 94 | 26.1% | |
| 👍 | 72 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 6.11% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 2.78% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 1.94% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 1.67% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.833% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 0.833% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.278% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.278% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 360reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2025 to 23 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#cyberwave2025 Друзья, мы смонтировали видеообзор конференции. 🍿 Вспомнить всё вместе с Cyberwave 2025 На кадрах все ключевые моменты — выступления спикеров, воркшопы и ретротехника, а также, конечно, наши замечательные гости. Иными словами, если вы не нашли себя на фото, есть шанс, что засветились на видео! Так что ищем себя и отмечаем друзей, вспоминаем, какой крутой была конференция, и ждём новые ивенты. А если…
🔥10❤7👍6👾1
#cyberwave2025 Многие спрашивали про презентации с конференции. Редакция CISOCLUB сделала обзор Cyberwave 2025, в котором подробно разобрала доклады спикеров. ✍️ Cyberwave 2025 глазами CISOCLUB И «подробно» здесь не преувеличение — наши партнёры не поленились расписать каждый доклад во всех деталях, за что им низкий поклон. Coerce-атаки и как от них защититься, десяток кейсов утечек данных, сложные вопросы антифрод…
❤12🔥6👍3
#cyberwave2025 Друзья, после майских наконец наступило, и у нас готов фотоотчёт с конференции! Он доступен на нашем сайте. Время освежить в памяти самые яркие моменты события, вспомнить о том, как удачно подходят друг другу планетарий и кибербез, и полюбоваться на прекрасных участников и участниц нашей конференции. В общем, ищите себя на фото с Cyberwave 2025! Комплименты, пожелания и жалобы на поруганную приватност…
❤15🔥7😁5👍2
#cyberwave2025 Друзья, Cyberwave2025 отгремел, и можно с уверенностью сказать, что конференция удалась. Мы получили много положительных откликов от коллег, участников и партнёров и в свою очередь хотим поблагодарить всех пришедших. Спасибо, что помогли нам сделать Cyberwave2025 таким крутым событием! 🍷 О тех, кто сделал вечер особенным Отдельная благодарность уходит ИТМО — CTF-батл, хак-квест и воркшоп прошли под и…
🔥17👍12❤7👾1🥰1
#live #cyberwave2025 Афтепати в самом разгаре.
🔥11❤5👍3
#live Стартует афтепати, друзья, в зале вас ждут закуски, а во дворе кальянная зона.
🔥9❤6👍6
#live Переходим к раздаче слонов! Награждение началось, приглашаем победителей на сцену!
🔥7👍5❤4
#cyberwave2025 Друзья, у нас работает стол находок, найдены наушники, забрать их можно у сцены.
🔥6❤4👍3🤯1
#live Друзья, после CTF-батла у нас по плану награждение с призами в 18:40 для всех причастных, а затем афтепати в 19:00 для всех желающих. DJ-сет со знакомыми саундтреками и чиптьюном, визуальное шоу на куполе планетария, непринужденное общение с коллегами и социализация с настоящими людьми вместо языковых моделей! Присоединяйтесь, всем будем рады! @cyberwave_sec
👍6🔥6🥰3❤1💯1🆒1
16:30 Антон Лопаницын, Носок на сок #live Не упустите возможность натянуть «Носок на сок» вместе с Антоном bo0om Лопаницыным. Избегаем назойливого внимания SOC-отделов и адаптируем свои методы в пентесте. Бонусом информация для синих команд о том, как поймать опытного пентестера в своих сетях. Последний доклад на сегодня, присоединяйтесь! @cyberwave_sec
🔥8👍6👏3❤2💘1
15:50 Алексей Смирнов, Знаем свои зависимости мощно и быстро #live Товарищи разработчики, а вы знаете все свои зависимости? Алексей Смирнов начинает свой доклад «Знаем свои зависимости мощно и быстро». Обсудим проблему излишних зависимостей, создаваемую ими поверхность атаки и то, как этих неприятностей можно избежать. Так что если у вас есть зависимости в проектах, спешите к сцене! @cyberwave_sec
❤10🔥8👏7💯1😎1
15:10 Алексей Морозов, Простым языком о сложных CVE #live Друзья, Алексей SooLFaa Морозов на сцене, поговорим «Простым языком о сложных CVE». SooLFaa — опытный пентестер и ИБ-специалист с 12-летним стажем, так что у него найдётся что рассказать из своего личного опыта с примерами на стеке популярных технологий и смешными историями из практики. Такое не стоит пропускать! @cyberwave_sec
🔥8🗿7👍5👏5❤2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cyberwave_sec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 969,340 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cyberwave 2025” (@cyberwave_sec), 398 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberwave_sec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.