Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مُحَمَّد عقِيلة .

@cv3ix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,630subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002010202137
TypeChannel
Username@cv3ix
Descriptionعَصبي ولكنهُ حنون .
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cv3ix

Growth

6,6306,6996,664.57 August 2026 — 6,699 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,696 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,630 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,620–6,709 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:216,630-66
7 Aug 2026, 12:436,696-3
7 Aug 2026, 04:026,699first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.2%
avg views ÷ 6,630 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (18 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total36,769
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
78
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 25 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cv3ix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC324 views0 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

أكثر دعوتين ربي يستجيب فيهن بسرعة ، لمّا تطلب من ربي تكون شخص ناضج ورازن ، وكان طلبته انه يبعد عليك الناس السيئة ، الدعوتين هذينا تدعيهن اليوم بكرى تبدا الصدمات .

10 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC657 views0 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

توا قعدنا نتعاملوا مع بعضنا علي حسب المصلحة شنو نقدر ناخذ منك عشان نصاحبك ونكمل معاك مع إختلاف نوع المصلحة طبعاً ، اصلا تحسها قعدت قيمتك في دنيا مربوطة باللي تقدر تقدمه للناس ، أما أصلك ونظافة نيتك من جوه ، فهذا شيء يخصك أنت بروحك وميهم حد ، أنت الوحيد اللي عارف روحك من تكون .

9 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC790 views0 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

​تفكيرك بدا سلبي تخيل في حاجات سلبيه ممكن مش حتصير او خايف انها تصير هذي حدمرلك نفسيتك وفي مجتمعنا للأسف مايرعوش ، وكان لقوك مستك ومضايق يقولك كنك وعادي وتمشي الامور من غير مايعرف شن صايرلك ، وحتى لو عرف نفس شي مافيش حد حاس بيك ، وتبي حد يفهمك و يطلعك من مشكلتك النفسيه وبديت تحشم ولا معش تحكي لحد مشاكلك ، وعلمونا من صغرنا انه شكوه لغير الله مذله ، لالا فوته احكي لكن اعرف لمن تحكي هذا لا بينقص لا بيزيد من قدرك وكرامتك

8 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC908 views0 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026

غريبة كيف كلمة تطلع بعفوية تفرزلك العقليات الناس ، وتوريك حجم الجمود الفكري اللي عايشين فيه ، والله ياريت الثقل والرزانة ينباعوا ، عشان نشروهن هدية للناس اللي ناقصها ثقل .

7 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,040 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

مجتمعنا أفشل مجتمع لأن الأغلب مايفكروش بدماغهم ، بس يورثوا نفس المعتقدات والمبادئ بدون مايسألوا نفسهم هل هذا صح او خطأ فعلاً .

6 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,170 views0 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026

في نوعية من الناس أساس مرضهم النفسي وعقدهم بين الحشوة والجلد ، وعارفين عيوبهم ونقصهم كويس ، لكن الأنانية وحب النفس اللي فيهم تمنعهم يعترفوا بالحق ، فشن يديروا يقلبوا في الطاولة ويلصقوا في بلاويهم وعيوبهم كلها في شخص ثاني مالش أي ذنب ، عشان يقنعوا رواحهم إنهم هما الصح والناس الثانية هي اللي مريضة وعندها مشكلة .

5 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,150 views0 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

اللي يلغي شخصيته وذوقه وقناعاته خوفًا من نظرة الناس هو اللي مش طبيعي ، الإختلاف هو الطبيعي .

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,280 views0 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

الشخص اللي واعي وعي حقيقي ديما تلقى مع وعيه حكمة ، لأن الوعي يخليك تشوف الناس علي حقيقتها ، مثلاً إن تلقى الناس يوثقوا ويمدحوا في شخص معين ، وأنت بوعيك الحاد عارف ومكتشف إنه العكس ، عشان هكي الإنسان الواعي يمر بثلاث مراحل ، الصدمة ، بعدها البلادة ، وفي النهاية الحكمة لأنه مستحيل تلقى شخص واعي ومايعرفش يتصرف . وبخصوص الوعي: الميديا ملياااانه بمدعين الوعي واللي صنعهم هما بسطاء الفكر "المنبهرين" وأنا من الناس اللي ما ن

3 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,290 views0 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

أوسخ ما تقابل في دنيتك ، لما تتفاجأ بحد كانت بينك وبينه عشرة طيبة ، يبدأ يعزق في الدوه عليك بكلام عشان خلاف صار بينكم ، الناس هذي عندها كمية نفاق وغل مش عادية ، وربي سلب منهم نعمة العقل ، الواحد يقدر يرد الكلمة بعشرة ، لكن التربية والأصل يحكمن في صاحبهن .

1 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,490 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

أنا نحترم اللي يثبت على مبدأه أكثر من المبدأ نفسه حتى لو كان تفكيره يختلف عليا ، يقعد عندي أفضل وأرجل بواجد من شخص متلخبط ، يمشي جوه ومبادئه علي حسب المصلحة والمزاج .

31 Jul 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,570 views0 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

ممكن نقبل الحياد والقبول من طرف واحد في كل شيء ، إلا الخبيثين ، أنتمنى البغض والتنافر يكون متبادل ، كيف أني نكرههم أكثر ، وهما يكرهوني اكسترا أكثر .

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @cv3ix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 229,999 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مُحَمَّد عقِيلة .” (@cv3ix), 6,630 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cv3ix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.