Channel
@cryptoponyo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,810subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002508135923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptoponyo |
| Created | Between 1 February 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptoponyo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 2,810 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 2,811 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 2,812 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 2,812 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (16 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,358 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 71.4% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
미국 거래소 근황 코인베이스 올 5월 700명 감원. 실적전망치 하회, 순손실 359M로 적자 전환. 올해 주가 40% 하락 제미니 올 2월 200명 감원, 작년 9월 IPO 이후 주가 90% 하락. COO CFO CLO 동시사임 크라켄 올 5월 150명 감원, IPO 연기 가능성 크립토닷컴 올 3월 180명 감원 (중국계는 자료를 찾을 수 없음) 코인게코 리포트 보면 바낸/바이빗이 그나마 점유율을 잘 지키고 있는 것으로 보이는데.. 거래량 자체가 2분기만 해도 30% 가까이 줄어서 모두가 고통받고 있을 것. 해외 거래소는 외부로 빠져나가는 볼륨 잡으려고 선물 예측시장 카드 토큰화주식 다 때려박은 슈퍼앱 만들고 아니면 밈코인 플레이로 최후의 발악이라도 해볼 수 있는데.. 국내는 시도할 기회조차 주어지지 않음
❤1
업비트 거래량 안나오는거 알겠는데 이게 맞나
: : [인베스트먼트/리포트] 2026 Q2 Hyperliquid 리포트 작성자: Four Pillars (Ponyo), GLC Research - 본 리포트는 2026년 2분기 하이퍼리퀴드의 재무 성과와 생태계 동향, 구조적 변화를 다룬다. 1분기가 하이퍼리퀴드의 "House of All Finance" 비전이 현실임을 증명한 분기였다면, 2분기는 그 위에서 실물 자산이 본격적으로 거래되고 제도권 자본이 유입되기 시작한 분기다. HIP-3 실물자산(RWA) 시장은 주식과 원자재, Pre-IPO를 아우르며 잇따라 최고 거래대금을 경신했고, 전체 거래대금에서 차지하는 비중도 최근 세 분기 동안 1.8% → 20.7% → 32.2%로 증가했다. 2분기 거래대금만 2,133억 달러로, 플랫폼 전체 거래의 3분의 1에 육박한다. - 제도권 자본은…
❤6
pumpfun 바이백 vs 가격
👆 제가 3월에 쓴 글 참고. CRCL 주가 아직 비쌈
❤2
🦁 모건스탠리, 서클 목표주가 $106→$38 64%하향 1. 2027년, 공급량 33%. 2028년 44% 감소 예상 2. MMF 와 토큰화 예금과의 경쟁 심화 목표가를 60% 이상 내린 건 또 처음이네요. @ryan_research
❤1
여러분 꼭 가보세요. 퀄리티 지립니다
❤2
크립토랑 무관하지만, 저랑 친한 지인의 아주 각별한 지인이 서울 신사에서 가우디 전시전을 하신다고 해서 공유합니다. 저도 평소에 교양이나 예술적 소양따위는 없지만, 그래도 아주 친한 지인의 아주 각별한 지인께서 하시는 것이다보니 겸사겸사 예술적 소양을 기르러 가보려고 합니다. 광고 아님. 링크
: : HRC, HL Eco와 함께 하이퍼리퀴드 재무 대시보드 Hyperliquid Financials 출시 포필러스와 GLC 리서치가 설립한 HRC가 HL Eco와 협력해 하이퍼리퀴드(Hyperliquid)의 재무 정보를 실시간으로 제공하는 대시보드 Hyperliquid Financials를 출시했습니다. HRC는 퀄리티 높은 하이퍼리퀴드 리서치를 작성하고 관련 리서처들의 허브가 되고자 하이퍼리퀴드와 Trade[XYZ]의 분기 및 연간 보고서를 발간하며 이 여정을 시작했습니다. Hyperliquid Financials 대시보드를 통해 그 목표를 한 단계 더 발전시켜 실시간 리포팅으로 나아갑니다. 전통 금융권이 하이퍼리퀴드와 Trade[XYZ]를 주목하고 있지만, 그 관심이 실질적인 이해로 이어지려면 투자자와 애널리스트를 비롯한 모든 이…
: : 포필러스, 국내 대학 블록체인 학회 대상 "Four Pillars Research Challenge 2026" 개최 포필러스가 국내 주요 대학 블록체인 학회를 대상으로 총 상금 $8,000 규모의 리서치 경진대회인 "Four Pillars Research Challenge 2026"을 개최합니다. 솔라나(Solana), 메타마스크(MetaMask), 칸토8(Cantor8), 서프 AI(Surf AI)가 스폰서로 참여하여 4개의 리서치 트랙이 존재하며, 참가 학회들에게는 더블록 프로(The Block Pro)와 서프 AI의 유료 구독 계정이 제공될 예정입니다. 공정한 대회 진행을 위해 참가 신청부터 리서치 작성, 제출은 전부 익명으로 진행되며, 10월 1일 저녁에는 해시드 라운지에서 시상식 및 학회 중심의 행사가 있을 예정이니 많…
Another one bites the dust https://x.com/bitmartexchange/status/2081197305491845201?s=46
야핑 시즌2 시작? https://x.com/kaitoai/status/2080261656421212505?s=46
💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cryptoponyo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 471,290 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“벼랑 위의 포뇨” (@cryptoponyo), 2,810 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoponyo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.