Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CRYPTO PIN ⚜

Channel

CRYPTO PIN ⚜

@cryptop1n

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

379subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153744746
TypeChannel
Username@cryptop1n
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptop1n

Growth

37912 Aug 2026, 09:01 — 379 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 17:53 — 379 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:0112 Aug 2026, 17:53
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:53379no change
12 Aug 2026, 09:01379first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 25s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1139.3%
🔥517.9%
👌27.14%
🤔27.14%
🤩27.14%
🕊13.57%
😁13.57%
🙊13.57%
🙏13.57%
🤯13.57%
🥴13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 19 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Dec 2024, 22:54 UTC403 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Целая неделя истерии трейдеров, cкамеров и так называемых инфлюенсеров TON, большинство из которых на своих каналах стремится в бетон закатать блокчейн. Самое интересное, они воют, орут, матерятся, но не уходят в другие сети. А как было бы кстати. Некоторые лиды делают вид, что все по плану и пророчат будущие хайпы через мемкоины и тапалки, между делом рассказывая об успехах проектов на известных блокчейнах. Другие

1 Dec 2024, 15:23 UTC317 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем DOGS все еще торгуется по 0.0007, немножко поднялся, но все же еще не АТХ ) Настрой комьюнити на памп,многие холдят в долгую, если команда DOGS не потухнут, монета капнет

1 Dec 2024, 15:19 UTC267 viewsread 12 August 2026

BLUM обещают же листинг до конца 2024 года. Сейчас премаркет 0.005-0.008$ за монетку Интересно, реализуют ли они листинг как и планировали или будут как хомяки тянуть🤣 Сейчас я больших надежд на этот проект уже не допускаю, но по моему мнению, он на данный самый перспективный среди всех airdrop в телеграмме. Кто еще не зашел, заходите, скажем так, хлеба дадут) Не заскамят, как хомяки дали по 2$, тут спокойно с одн

30 Nov 2024, 23:46 UTC197 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ваши ставки биткоин 💸 достигнет отметки в 100.000$ до 2025 года? ♥️ да 🔥нет Сейчас он торгуется по 96.500$

5🔥3

29 Nov 2024, 15:30 UTC184 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1 млрд USDT выпущен Tether💵 🎆Tether Treasury только что напечатала еще 1,000,000,000 USDT. Эти токены будут использоваться для обеспечения ликвидности и удовлетворения будущих запросов. 💸BTC тем временем вырос до $98 500.

29 Nov 2024, 01:28 UTC160 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ТОП правительств-холдеров Биткоина! 🇺🇸 США — 208 109 BTC 🇨🇳 Китай — 194 000 BTC 🇬🇧 Великобритания — 61 000 BTC 🇧🇹 Королевство Бутан — 12,207 BTC 🇸🇻 Сальвадор — 5,947 BTC 🇺🇦 Украина — 642 BTC 🇻🇪 Венесуэла 240 BTC 🇫🇮 Финляндия — 85 BTC

29 Nov 2024, 01:26 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Меры безопасности, которые хотелось бы видеть на TON-кошельках ▫️Предварительный просмотр каждой транзакции для показа пользователю, что произойдет, если он ее подпишет. ▫️Предупреждение при обнаружении транзакции, которая может быть вредоносной. Включая транзакции с адресами, кем-либо помеченные как подозрительные. ▫️Тесное взаимодействие с сервисом, отслеживающим угрозы на блокчейне, связанные с фишингом, взлома

1

25 Nov 2024, 19:58 UTC202 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Telegram ≠ Анонимность Во Fragment'e добавили верификацию для аккаунтов и кошельков. При попытке приобрести анонимный номер, звезды или юзернейм необходимо пройти KYC. Для прохождения используется сторонний сервис Sumsub, который не поддерживает российские номера. Для того, чтоб пройти верификацию, нужно предоставить свою почту, номер телефона, фото документа, удостоверяющего личность и скан лица. Это произошло

23 Nov 2024, 14:08 UTC175 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

❗️12-летний школьник создал мемкоин и заработал 30 000 долларов, но мог заработать больше 4 миллионов. Недавно школьник создал токен QUANT на PinkFinance по прямой трансляции. Дождавшись, пока толпа начнет покупать токен, он продал все свои монеты и очень радовался, что заработал 30 000 долларов. Но судьба сыграла злую шутку, и теперь капитализация монеты составляет 44 миллиона долларов, а в пике достигала более 70

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptop1n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,455,084 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTO PIN ⚜” (@cryptop1n), 379 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptop1n.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.