Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cryptonite Officials

@cryptonite_officials

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

199subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509266657
TypeChannel
Username@cryptonite_officials
DescriptionWE ARE NOT A FINANCIAL ADVISER🤚 ‼️ MUST #DYOR BEFORE YOU BUY 🙌 🚀HERE YOU WILL EARLY BSC/ERC TOKEN WITH GOOD POTENTIALS🚀 OWNER/Marketing => @cryptomancall Jp
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 29 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptonite_officials

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@cryptonite_officials/701 · this entry7 May 2022, 14:30 UTC@crypto_world_officials/8197 May 2022, 14:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_world_officials/8208 May 2022, 14:30 UTC@cryptonite_officials/702 · this entry8 May 2022, 14:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptonite_officials/705 · this entry15 May 2022, 15:21 UTC@crypto_world_officials/82315 May 2022, 15:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptonite_officials/706 · this entry21 May 2022, 15:06 UTC@crypto_world_officials/82421 May 2022, 15:06 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptonite_officials/707 · this entry22 May 2022, 15:15 UTC@crypto_world_officials/82522 May 2022, 15:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptonite_officials/708 · this entry23 May 2022, 15:07 UTC@crypto_world_officials/82623 May 2022, 15:07 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypto_world_officials19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (145)
@The_Crypto_Land_official19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (145)
@Universe_crypto19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (145)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 May 2022 to 27 November 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @cryptonite_officials — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1997 Aug 2026, 01:56 — 199 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 199 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:567 Aug 2026, 04:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:32199no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:56199first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
341
Videos
55
Links
311

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

27 Nov 2022, 05:05 UTC587 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin has witnessed a typical bear market capitulation already. 🔸 For this illustration, Its realized profit/loss ratio hit record low levels. 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

28 May 2022, 03:30 UTC≈30,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Central African Republic unveils plans for 'Crypto Hub', includes construction of crypto islands and digital wallets. This is just the beginning! source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

27 May 2022, 03:30 UTC≈29,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Coinbase makes it to the Fortune 500 list! Congrats Coinbase! source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

26 May 2022, 03:30 UTC≈29,000 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin in 15 min timeframe: 🔸Bitcoin bounced from the $28,600 support as expected 🔸BTC is testing resistance at $29,400 🔸We can also see a bullish falling wedge pattern in the 15 min time frame 🔸BTC has to close the hourly candle above $29,400 for continued bullish movement ❕Support at $28,600 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

25 May 2022, 03:19 UTC≈28,800 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔸Bitcoin Realized Price (essentially the average cost basis) is at $23,791. 🔸Historically, buying under the RP has been lucrative if you have a macro, long-term (multi-year) approach If the rare opportunity of BTC going below the RP arises, I'd definitely take on this amazing opportunity. source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

24 May 2022, 15:25 UTC≈28,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Nasdaq & Dow Macro chart 🔸 The Nasdaq and Dow Jones have reached a 14-year supportive trendline. After touching it, it had a bullish reaction. 🔸 Nasdaq and Dow Jones weekly RSIs have entered the oversold zone. A strong bounce here in the coming weeks would be good for Bitcoin! source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

23 May 2022, 15:07 UTC≈28,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BTC is still indecisive 🔸 BTC trying its best to pump up to Daily 20 EMA to flip Resistance into Support. 🔸 However, previous Daily Dojis show significant market indecision (long wicks), and so far keep breaking down. source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

22 May 2022, 15:15 UTC≈28,600 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔸 The S&P 500 is down 18.2% in the first 96 trading days of 2022 🔸 This is the worst start to a year since 1940. Will the global stocks end the year with a green return? Remember that bitcoin is strongly correlated with this market. source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

21 May 2022, 15:06 UTC≈28,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Monthly RSI is approaching historical lows Bounce or Breakdown? Watch closely how this level will react on the monthly closes. source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

15 May 2022, 15:21 UTC≈28,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Luna Holdings Update as of May 15: 🔸Total addresses holding Luna has grown to 7,058 from 2,286 2 days ago (+4772 addresses/208%) 🔸The Top 100 holders account for 47.6% of the total supply 🔸One account holds 485M Luna (9.5% of supply) Careful out there, trading Luna is Market Maker’s Game 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

12 May 2022, 14:19 UTC≈28,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️Tether temporarily lost its peg to the U.S. dollar Tether (USDT) fell to $0.97 cents in the Asian session, losing its peg to the dollar. USDT fell to $0.96 cents on the Coinbase exchange. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said the company has enough reserves to redeem assets at a 1:1 ratio to the U.S. dollar. "Over $300 million has been redeemed in the last 24 hours without a drop of sweat," he said. 🔍 More Crypto News 〰

10 May 2022, 09:07 UTC≈28,500 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Australia to launch first spot Bitcoin ETF on Thursday BTC spot ETF rolls out! source 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ For Ads Visit @ProjectAdverts 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptonite_officials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptonite Officials” (@cryptonite_officials), 199 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptonite_officials.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.