Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐˜พ๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™‰๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™Ÿ๐™– ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™–๐™˜๐™โ„ข

@cryptoninjacoach

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

368subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001371773302
TypeChannel
Username@cryptoninjacoach
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptoninjacoach

Topic

Crypto & trading โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@cryptoninjacoach/3742 ยท this entry1 May 2025, 11:44 UTC@cryptoworldcoach/67171 May 2025, 11:45 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoninjacoach/3743 ยท this entry1 May 2025, 19:27 UTC@cryptoworldcoach/67181 May 2025, 19:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoninjacoach/3751 ยท this entry16 Jan 2026, 16:59 UTC@cryptoworldcoach/672516 Jan 2026, 16:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoworldcoach/672612 Mar 2026, 14:03 UTC@cryptoninjacoach/3752 ยท this entry12 Mar 2026, 14:15 UTC1.0011 minutes
@cryptoninjacoach/3755 ยท this entry6 Apr 2026, 17:20 UTC@cryptoworldcoach/67296 Apr 2026, 17:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptoworldcoach/673012 Apr 2026, 03:11 UTC@cryptoninjacoach/3756 ยท this entry12 Apr 2026, 03:11 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@cryptoworldcoach18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (16โ€“2)
@binanceactivetrade10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@binanceactivetrade (10โ€“0)
@CryptoSignaLCrazy9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@CryptoSignaLCrazy (9โ€“0)
@cryptoprofitcoach9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@cryptoprofitcoach (9โ€“0)
@BinancePumpTracker9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@BinancePumpTracker (9โ€“0)
@BinancePumpFinder9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutes@BinancePumpFinder (9โ€“0)
@AltTheWay7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@AltTheWay (6โ€“1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 54 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 April 2025 to 9 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @cryptoninjacoach โ€” which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy ยท clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channelโ€™s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ€” 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ€” 60%, no better than a coin flip โ€” because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

368369368.56 Aug 2026, 08:34 โ€” 369 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:47 โ€” 369 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:03 โ€” 368 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:347 Aug 2026, 05:03
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 368โ€“369 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:03368-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:47369no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:34369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 April 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

9 May 2026, 10:10 UTC90 viewsread 6 August 2026

#APT/BTC ๐Ÿ‘ˆ Call given here hit 1460 Target 1 done โœ… ๐Ÿ‘‰ 25% Profit ๐Ÿค‘ We are no.1 pump tracker on telegram we buy at low level and sell at high level If you invested 1 btc it's now 1.25 btc ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘ Signal before pump @ low level Always trade with us for max profit ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ƒ

4 May 2026, 03:11 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#RLC/USDT ๐Ÿ‘ˆ Call given here hit 525 Target 1 done โœ… ๐Ÿ‘‰ more than 17% Profit ๐Ÿค‘ ๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ต We are no.1 pump tracker on telegram we buy at low level and sell at high level ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒนโœจ๐ŸŒน If you invested 1 btc it's now 1.17 btc ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘ Signal before pump @ low level Always trade with us for max profit ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ƒ

2 May 2026, 16:56 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#RLC Profit Projections x10๐Ÿคซ https://www.binance.com/en/trade/RLC_USDT Buying Zone 440-450 Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 500 ๐Ÿค‘ 500-600 ๐Ÿค‘ 600-700 ๐Ÿค‘ 700-800 ๐Ÿš€ 800 -900 & above Currently facing R if broken x2 we can expect Bullish above 400๐Ÿ”ผ Death zone below 400๐Ÿ”ฝ

15 Apr 2026, 15:57 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026

#APT/BTC https://www.binance.com/en/trade/APT_BTC Buying Zone 1170-1220 Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 1300-1400 ๐Ÿค‘ 1400-1500 ๐Ÿค‘ 1500-1600 ๐Ÿค‘ 600-1800 ๐Ÿš€ 1800 -2000 & above Ready to boost๐Ÿš€ Bullish above 1140๐Ÿ”ผ Death zone below 1140๐Ÿ”ฝ

12 Apr 2026, 03:11 UTC71 viewsread 6 August 2026

#PEPE https://www.binance.com/en/trade/PEPE_USDT Buying Zone 350-370 Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 400-420 ๐Ÿค‘ 420-460 ๐Ÿค‘ 460-500 ๐Ÿค‘ 500-550 ๐Ÿš€ 550 -600 & above Currently facing R if broken x2 we can expect Bullish above 330๐Ÿ”ผ Death zone below 330๐Ÿ”ฝ

6 Apr 2026, 17:20 UTC77 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#TRU/USDT ๐Ÿ‘ˆ Call given here hit 134 All Target done โœ… ๐Ÿ‘‰ 167 % Profit ๐Ÿค‘ ๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ต We are no.1 pump tracker on telegram we buy at low level and sell at high level ๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒนโœจ๐ŸŒน If you invested 1 btc it's now 2.67 btc ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘ Signal before pump @ low level Always trade with us for max profit ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ƒ

30 Mar 2026, 16:06 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026

#ADX ๐Ÿ‘ˆ https://www.binance.com/en/trade/ADX_BTC Buying Zone 96-99 ๐Ÿ‘† Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 105 ๐Ÿค‘ 105-110 ๐Ÿš€ 110-120 ๐Ÿ’ƒ 120-130 ๐Ÿ˜ฑ 130- 150 & above Bullish above- 94๐Ÿ”ผ Death Zone below-94๐Ÿ”ฝ

14 Mar 2026, 15:57 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026

#TRU https://www.binance.com/en/trade/TRU_USDT Buying Zone 55-59 Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 65-70 ๐Ÿค‘ 70-75 ๐Ÿค‘ 75-85 ๐Ÿค‘ 85-100 ๐Ÿš€ 100 -115 & above Currently facing R if broken x2 we can expect Bullish above 50๐Ÿ”ผ Death zone below 50๐Ÿ”ฝ

12 Mar 2026, 14:15 UTC61 viewsread 6 August 2026

#QI https://www.binance.com/en/trade/QI_USDT Buying Zone 195-200 Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 220 ๐Ÿค‘ 250 ๐Ÿค‘ 250-280 ๐Ÿค‘ 280-310 ๐Ÿš€ 310-350 & above Currently facing R if broken x2 we can expect Bullish above 178๐Ÿ”ผ Death zone below 178๐Ÿ”ฝ

16 Jan 2026, 16:59 UTC110 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#SYS ๐Ÿ‘ˆ https://www.binance.com/en/trade/SYS_BTC Buying rate 21-23 ๐Ÿ‘€sitting near bottom Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 29 ๐Ÿค‘ 32 ๐Ÿค‘ 35 ๐Ÿš€ 40 & above Bullish above 20 ๐Ÿ”ผ Death Zone below 19 ๐Ÿ”ฝ

25 Oct 2025, 08:09 UTC133 viewsread 6 August 2026

#ADX ๐Ÿ‘ˆ https://www.binance.com/en/trade/ADX_BTC Buying Zone 80-87 ๐Ÿ‘† Sell ๐Ÿค‘ 100 ๐Ÿค‘ 100-110 ๐Ÿš€ 110-120 ๐Ÿ’ƒ 120-130 ๐Ÿ˜ฑ 130- 150 & above Bullish above- 75๐Ÿ”ผ Death Zone below-75 ๐Ÿ”ฝ

19 Jul 2025, 18:10 UTC223 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#HEI ๐Ÿ‘ˆ Call given here hit 0.4169$ ๐Ÿค‘ Target 1 to 3 done โœ… ๐Ÿ‘‰ 49% Profit on spot ๐Ÿค‘ & Future- ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘ If you invested 1 btc it's now 1.49 btc in spot trading ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿค‘ Signal before pump @ low level Always trade with us for max profit ๐Ÿ˜Š๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ƒ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptoninjacoach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 548,600 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐˜พ๐™ง๐™ฎ๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ค ๐™‰๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™Ÿ๐™– ๐˜พ๐™ค๐™–๐™˜๐™โ„ขโ€ (@cryptoninjacoach), 368 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoninjacoach.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.