Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cryptex Copy Fund

@cryptocopyfundcryptex

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

217subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001256831079
TypeChannel
Username@cryptocopyfundcryptex
DescriptionThis channel is dedicated to our signal/copy fund on cryptexmarkets.com We charge 10% management fee of profits only. Minimum is $1000 investment. We do not have access to your acc only to trade. To join the fund you can contact @CTM18
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 29 May 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cryptocopyfundcryptex

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@cryptocopyfundcryptex/754 · this entry30 May 2018, 14:10 UTC@paidsignalscryptex/91430 May 2018, 14:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptocopyfundcryptex/757 · this entry31 May 2018, 10:45 UTC@paidsignalscryptex/91731 May 2018, 10:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@cryptocopyfundcryptex/753 · this entry30 May 2018, 13:27 UTC@paidsignalscryptex/92031 May 2018, 15:03 UTC1.0026 hours
@cryptocopyfundcryptex/763 · this entry1 Jun 2018, 08:01 UTC@paidsignalscryptex/9231 Jun 2018, 08:01 UTC0.99under a minute
@cryptocopyfundcryptex/762 · this entry31 May 2018, 19:02 UTC@paidsignalscryptex/92231 May 2018, 19:02 UTC0.9872 seconds
@cryptocopyfundcryptex/766 · this entry1 Jun 2018, 11:13 UTC@paidsignalscryptex/9261 Jun 2018, 11:13 UTC0.96under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@paidsignalscryptex8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (71)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 May 2018 to 7 June 2018. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @cryptocopyfundcryptex — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2177 Aug 2026, 00:11 — 217 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 217 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 00:117 Aug 2026, 03:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:31217no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:11217first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 May 2018the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2018. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
169

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2018, 10:14 UTC≈2,580 viewsread 7 August 2026

Just a reminder that if you want to withdraw funds deposits need to be done by 12 UK time otherwise you'll need to wait until platform has resolved their financial issues.

4 Jun 2018, 13:05 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 7 August 2026

I just wanted to thank those individuals for putting there trust in me at this time and I aim by Wednesday you will not be disappointed with you receiving your funds back 👍 message me @ctm18 if you have any queries

4 Jun 2018, 10:16 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 7 August 2026

I appreciate clients bro g apprehensive as this is a shit time for corporate clients in particular. I've been told due to a lot of clients depositing in order to get their funds back that a two day extension has been given. After this it's a case of waiting unfortunately but I will be here to assist or if anyone has any queries @ctm18

1 Jun 2018, 11:13 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 7 August 2026

Guys I just wanted to say your patience is appreciated with the issue in hand. My only objective is to get my funds as quickly as possible to you. I know a vast amount of you have agreed mainly on basis you need funds back, the quicker I can assist with this will hopefully mean the trust can continue between us and when I have my own platform we can start growing your capital even more 🚀🚀🚀😊 @ctm18

1 Jun 2018, 10:15 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 7 August 2026

Been given confirmation that deposits have to be made in coins and not by card or bank transfer due to these facilities being unavailable at present. Please feel free to contact me if you have any queries regarding the deposit fee @ctm18

1 Jun 2018, 08:36 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 7 August 2026

Just to clarify ICO crypto coins are worth $1 each 😳

1 Jun 2018, 08:01 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hey guys, this is pretty in-depth what I'm just about to post so any queries msg @ctm18 or info@ and I'll hopefully be able to clarify. Over the last 2 months due to some extremely bad press CRYPTEXMARKETS are now looking to potentially close their platform due to major investors and corporations pulling out, there are a vast amount of clients who have enjoyed great profits which is great to hear however due to them

31 May 2018, 19:02 UTC794 viewsread 7 August 2026

I've been speaking to Michael O'Connor from a firm of solicitors close to me and I just wanted to inform individuals due to a capital restructuring at cryptex the reason I've found for withdrawals to be pending continuously is lack if liquidity. The lawyers are buying up ICO coins from them at a discounted rate so any person looking to withdraw but hasn't succeeded then they can contact info@cryptexmarkets.com and co

31 May 2018, 15:30 UTC664 viewsread 7 August 2026

Just to clarify to new clients that the platform can provide withdrawals each month in a bank transfer incase your country has stopped crypto @ctm18

31 May 2018, 15:03 UTC610 viewsread 7 August 2026

To all new clients that are due to deposit today I will be able to give you a bigger trade than normal so you can see the profits that our current clients are making 🤑🤑 @ctm18

31 May 2018, 14:10 UTC593 viewsread 7 August 2026

Getting alot of requests for the dividend fund, there are different levels where you receive a set percentage of your balance plus we can provide a stop loss if you are more of a safety investor. @ctm18

31 May 2018, 12:31 UTC608 viewsread 7 August 2026

Another successful trade guys: ETH/BTC 5% Risk Put Option 80% profit Another successful trade For our clients who were able to get involved. Welcome on board new members. Look forward to more trades this week. If you are looking for more risk or trades please contact me @ctm18 Remember traders with great account capital gain access to exclusive trades. The deposit of coins bonus is due to end Thursday, let me know

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptocopyfundcryptex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptex Copy Fund” (@cryptocopyfundcryptex), 217 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptocopyfundcryptex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.