🚨 JUST IN: United States and China reach deal to cut tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods following Xi Jinping's talks with President Trump. @crypto_wolf_com
❤1

Channel
@crypto_wolf_com
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,574subscribers
-1,124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002086010937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_wolf_com |
| Description | Bitcoin, Ethereum & crypto news for traders. Fast BTC/ETH market moves, catalysts & analysis. No hype, no fake signals. 🥇 Gold & Forex → @wells_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_wolf_com |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 25,574 | -48 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 25,622 | -51 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:22 | 25,673 | -36 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 25,709 | -39 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 25,748 | -75 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 25,823 | -70 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 25,893 | -54 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 25,947 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 25,978 | -23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 26,001 | -42 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 26,043 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 26,066 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 26,081 | -41 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 26,122 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 26,143 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 26,173 | -36 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 26,209 | -49 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 26,258 | -41 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 26,299 | -29 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 26,328 | first reading |
263 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 97 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 263 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 34,002 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
193 reactions across 124 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 166 | 86.0% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 9.33% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.63% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 263 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 263 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 JUST IN: United States and China reach deal to cut tariffs on $30 billion worth of goods following Xi Jinping's talks with President Trump. @crypto_wolf_com
❤1
📈 SPOT ETF INFLOWS: US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $2.39B in inflows this week, the highest of 2026. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bullish | strong institutional demand 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 89 similar events, BTC moved +1.3% on avg in ~24h (48 up / 41 down). Past patterns don't guarantee the future. @crypto_wolf_com
🔒 UPDATE: Bitget fixes security vulnerability, withdrawals to resume in phases Withdrawals for BTC start on Sept. 28, ETH on Sept. 29, USDT on Sept. 30, and other tokens on Oct. 2. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bullish | resolution of security issue Ξ ETH → Bullish | resolution of security issue 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 62 similar events, BTC moved -0.1% on avg in ~24h (28 up / 34 down). Past patterns don't…
❤1
🚨 JUST IN: OpenAI says rogue AI agents leaked ChatGPT user images online OpenAI launched an investigation to review the incident, claiming it could take months. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | security concerns in crypto 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 56 similar events, BTC moved -0.0% on avg in ~24h (28 up / 28 down). Past patterns don't guarantee the future. @crypto_wolf_com
🚨 ALERT: Bitget raises confirmed incident amount to $387.5M Bitget CEO Gracy Chen announced that the security incident has been contained, with no further unauthorized asset transfers possible. The platform will reveal its withdrawal resumption plan by 4:00 AM UTC on September 26. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | security breach concerns 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 55 similar events, BTC moved -0.0% on …
👍2
🇺🇸🇮🇷 JUST IN: Iran has offered the US a "7-day" proposal that could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within a week restart talks toward ending the war, per FT. @crypto_wolf_com
🚨 UPDATE: Bitget CEO Gracy Chen links $352M hack to North Korean hackers using VPNs. citing IP addresses linked to VPNs used by a DPRK group. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | major exchange hack 🔶 BNB → Bearish | Bitget breach impact 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 17 similar events, BNB moved +1.1% on avg in ~24h (9 up / 8 down). Past patterns don't guarantee the future. @crypto_wolf_com
🚨 JUST IN: Bitget crypto exchange confirms over $350,000,000 stolen following major hack The exchange has reported that the total amount stolen has now exceeded $350 million, following earlier estimates of $170 million. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | major exchange hack 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 55 similar events, BTC moved -0.0% on avg in ~24h (28 up / 27 down). Past patterns don't guarantee the fu…
🚨 BREAKING: Bitget wallets suspected of security breach. Bitget may be experiencing an ongoing wallet security incident, with over $170 million worth of assets reportedly moved and swapped into ETH. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | ongoing security concerns 🔶 BNB → Bearish | exchange security issues 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 8 similar events, ETH moved +0.1% on avg in ~24h (4 up / 4 down). Past patter…
<b>🚨 ALERT: Bitget hacked for over $100M. Major security breach impacts the exchange.</b> Onchain data indicates a significant security breach affecting the exchange. <b>📊 Possible Market Move:</b> 🪙 BTC → Bearish | major exchange hack 📊 Base rate (not advice): last 54 similar events, BTC moved -0.0% on avg in ~24h (28 up / 26 down). Past patterns don't guarantee the future. @crypto_wolf_com
🇺🇸 BIG: The Senate is set to vote on a resolution seeking to halt Trump’s military action in Iran as rising gas prices become a midterm election issue. @crypto_wolf_com
❤1
🚨 LATEST: Chinese President Xi Jinping urges the U.S. and Iran to return to negotiations as soon as possible, Xinhua reports @crypto_wolf_com
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 263 posts we hold for @crypto_wolf_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Wolf - Bitcoin News” (@crypto_wolf_com), 25,574 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_wolf_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.