Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gold & Crypto News

Channel

Gold & Crypto News

@Gold_Crypto_News

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,374subscribers

-374 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001964738882
TypeChannel
Username@Gold_Crypto_News
DescriptionGold, Bitcoin & crypto news for traders — one feed. XAUUSD, DXY, BTC, ETH. Fed, CPI, ETF approvals, exchange hacks, geopolitics. Only the stories that move markets. No hype. No signals. No airdrops. 🥇 @wells_crypto · 🐺 @crypto_wolf_com
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gold_Crypto_News

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Gold_Crypto_News/2830 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC@goldbtcnews/6012 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC0.97under a minute
@Gold_Crypto_News/2938 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC@goldbtcnews/9219 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC0.96under a minute
@Gold_Crypto_News/3046 · this entry25 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC@goldbtcnews/12926 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC0.957.4 hours
@Gold_Crypto_News/2984 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC@goldbtcnews/10721 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC0.954.6 hours
@Gold_Crypto_News/2910 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC@goldbtcnews/8317 Aug 2026, 21:49 UTC0.944.0 hours
@Gold_Crypto_News/2906 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC@goldbtcnews/8217 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC0.938 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@goldbtcnews13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.944.0 hoursthis entry (13–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 604 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

14,36414,74814,55610 August 2026 — 14,748 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,744 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,729 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,726 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,710 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,711 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,700 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,680 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,662 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,668 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,657 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,641 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,640 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,647 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,637 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,633 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,638 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,614 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,612 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,614 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,608 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,594 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,600 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,589 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,591 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,580 subscribers24 September 2026 — 14,569 subscribers3 October 2026 — 14,538 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,528 subscribers12 October 2026 — 14,501 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,477 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,483 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,472 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,460 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,457 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,446 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,440 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,436 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,434 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,423 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,421 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,410 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,405 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,397 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,393 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,395 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,399 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,390 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,381 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,378 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,394 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,392 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,373 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,364 subscribers10 November 2026 — 14,368 subscribers13 November 2026 — 14,374 subscribers14,37410 August 202613 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 95 days, net -374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,306–14,806 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 10:5614,374+6
10 Nov 2026, 19:2014,368+4
9 Nov 2026, 07:4714,364-9
8 Nov 2026, 00:3814,373-19
5 Nov 2026, 19:4714,392-2
4 Nov 2026, 22:4814,394+16
3 Nov 2026, 18:5914,378-3
2 Nov 2026, 21:2914,381-9
2 Nov 2026, 00:3114,390-9
31 Oct 2026, 21:2814,399+4
30 Oct 2026, 19:1814,395+2
29 Oct 2026, 19:2914,393-4
28 Oct 2026, 20:2714,397-8
27 Oct 2026, 22:4914,405-5
25 Oct 2026, 23:0414,410-11
24 Oct 2026, 21:2014,421-2
23 Oct 2026, 20:2614,423-11
22 Oct 2026, 20:5814,434-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:1514,436-4
20 Oct 2026, 12:4914,440first reading

Engagement

668 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.90%
avg views ÷ 14,374 subscribers
Avg views / post
273
261 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.477%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
261
of 668 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 102 of 261 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held668 (9 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total71,137
Reactions total137
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
441
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 242 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤30882.1%
👍4612.3%
🔥123.20%
🥰61.60%
👏30.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 253 of the 668 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 668 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 261 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC40 viewsread 15 November 2026

🇨🇿 NEW: Czech National Bank issues first blockchain bonds after testing Bitcoin in its portfolio. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Mild bid | regulatory progress @Gold_Crypto_News

15 Nov 2026, 05:03 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026

📢 MARA sells 13,597 BTC for $1.1B to pay off loans and expand its AI data center. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | liquidation pressure from sales @Gold_Crypto_News

👍2

15 Nov 2026, 04:18 UTC110 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🚨 PAIN: Bitcoin has lost over $10,000 in a week — $BTC just hit a four-month low $BTC just hit a four-month low, sliding as far as $62,112 as leveraged longs got wiped out over the weekend. We've already bounced back above $65K. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | leveraged long liquidations @Gold_Crypto_News

15 Nov 2026, 03:08 UTC139 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🚨 JUST IN: Bitcoin turns green and reclaims $65,000. $130 million shorts liquidated. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bullish | short-covering rally @Gold_Crypto_News

15 Nov 2026, 02:34 UTC121 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔥 LATEST: Mike McGlone says Bitcoin led the rise in risk assets and may now signal deflation. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | signaling deflation risk @Gold_Crypto_News

15 Nov 2026, 01:05 UTC131 viewsread 15 November 2026

🚨 JUST IN: Bitcoin crashes under $63,000 The drop follows a significant liquidation of $205 million in crypto positions within the last hour. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | major liquidation event @Gold_Crypto_News

14 Nov 2026, 22:32 UTC173 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 LATEST: Uncle Sam is sitting on 306,790 $BTC and 17,430 $ETH, about $20.28B in crypto. @Gold_Crypto_News

❤1

14 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC184 viewsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🚨 JUST IN: $645,000,000 worth of crypto longs liquidated in the past 30 minutes. 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Bearish | liquidation pressure @Gold_Crypto_News

14 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC191 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🚨 INTERESTING: There are just 888,090 $BTC left to mine. @Gold_Crypto_News

👏1

14 Nov 2026, 17:57 UTC221 viewsread 15 November 2026

🚨 JUST IN: Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says crypto stablecoins have massively strengthened the US dollar's 📊 Possible Market Move: 🪙 BTC → Mild bid | stablecoin support for dollar @Gold_Crypto_News

14 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC227 viewsread 15 November 2026

🚨 JUST IN: Petition to bring back Jensen Huang as Nvidia CEO $NVDA hits 100,000 signatures. @Gold_Crypto_News

14 Nov 2026, 16:51 UTC228 viewsread 15 November 2026

🚨 JUST IN: $XRP drops below $0.95 for the first time since November 2024, alarming investors. 📊 Possible Market Move: ✕ XRP → Bearish | significant price drop 🪙 BTC → Bearish | market sentiment shifts @Gold_Crypto_News

Showing the 12 most recent of 668 posts we hold for @Gold_Crypto_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wells Gold & Forex
@wells_crypto · 67,128
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 August 2026
Crypto Wolf - Bitcoin News
@crypto_wolf_com · 24,345
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 September 2026
⚜️Gold Platinum Trader⚜️
@goldplatinum_trader · 37,635
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 September 2026
Turbo Traders International 🌎
@TURBOtradersInternationals · 117,976
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
VIP GOLD SIGNALS️
@vipgoldsignals_1778 · 28,835
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
Grow Trading
@GrowTradingAlerts · 68,214
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 August 2026
Wolf Fx VIP
@wolffxvip · 22,951
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
Forex Signals - Blue Pips
@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips · 68,761
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
GOLD EMPIRE
@forexanalysis · 113,215
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
Gold Trader Sunny 🏆
@goldtradersunny · 110,628
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 August 2026
Easy Forex 👑 OFFICIAL CHANNEL
@EasyForexPips · 237,131
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
𝗚𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗣𝗥𝗢 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗥
@goldprotradertame · 42,604
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
Forexero - Forex Signals
@forexero · 75,813
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
GOLD Snipers
@goldsnipers11 · 194,215
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
PipXpert - Forex Signals
@pipxpert · 24,806
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
Trade with Akash
@tradewithakashgarg · 36,578
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 7 September 2026
SureShot GOLD
@ssfgold · 38,644
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
FOREX SIGNALS FREEEE
@Forex_Signal_Freeeeee · 25,592
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
🎖 NetProfitFX 🥷🏽 FREE Trading Signals
@NPFXSignals · 25,568
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 October 2026
Alex Gold Trader
@Alex_goldtraderr · 86,679
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 23 September 2026
GOLD SIGNALS SCALPING ® GSS
@Education_Cycle01 · 41,266
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 2 September 2026
Ben, Gold Trader
@bengoldtrader · 354,902
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
Market Makers
@mmsignalsfx · 101,766
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
𝗔𝗟𝗟 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗫
@tradewithzafrre · 22,854
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gold & Crypto News” (@Gold_Crypto_News), 14,374 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gold_Crypto_News.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.