"IF IT'S FREE, WHAT'S THE CATCH?" It's a fair question. We're the first to be skeptical of "freebies" too. So let us be completely transparent: ❌ No subscriptions. ❌ No credit card required. ❌ No cut of your profits. The account is 100% yours. The money stays yours. You can withdraw whenever you want. And if you ever decide to stop, you just close it. No strings attached. We only win if you keep trad…

Channel
Forex Signals - Blue Pips
@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
70,971subscribers
-1,868 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001262709229 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips |
| Description | Welcome to Blue Pips An educational resource dedicated to trading analysis. • Purely informational • No financial advice Risk Disclosure: Trading carries significant risk. Profits are never guaranteed. For VIP Channel contact @BlueforexSupport |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 70,971 | -184 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 71,155 | -68 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:15 | 71,223 | -74 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 71,297 | -53 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 71,350 | -60 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 71,410 | -106 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 71,516 | -93 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 71,609 | -82 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 71,691 | -59 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 71,750 | -71 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 71,821 | -36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 71,857 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 71,881 | -50 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 71,931 | -31 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 71,962 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 71,991 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 72,019 | -50 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 72,069 | -30 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 72,099 | -100 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 72,199 | first reading |
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.28%
- avg views ÷ 70,971 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,040
- 64 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 64
- of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 119 (3 August 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 194,550 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 04:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 193
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 91
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🚀 STOP MISSING OUT – JOIN OUR VIP FOR FREE and don't miss any of our 15-25 VIP weekly signals! For a LIMITED TIME, you can access VIP at NO COST! 💰🔥 📩 Just MESSAGE US and we’ll send you direct access! Why wait? The market doesn’t stop, and neither should you! ⏳ ➡️CLICK HERE TO CLAIM YOUR FREE SPOT IN OUR VIP CHANNEL VIA AFFILIATION, 100% DEPOSIT BONUS INCLUDED
XAUUSD BUY LIMIT at 4252 SL 4239.8 TP 4285
GBPCHF BUY LIMIT at 1.0905 SL 1.0810 TP 1.1100
🔵 GBPCHF +53 BLUE PIPS!
53 pips running ✅ Small accounts and scalpers close the trade here. Swing traders close half lot and move sl to breakeven ✅ Trade secured.
New free signal shared ✅
NZDJPY BUY now at 90.16 SL 89.00 TP 92.00
CADCHF SELL now at 0.5875 SL 0.5960 TP 0.5700
🔵 CADCHF +40 BLUE PIPS!
40 pips running ✅ Small accounts and scalpers close the trade here. Swing traders close half lot and move sl to breakeven ✅ Trade secured.
Small sl hit here if the trade was not active yesterday in your broker. Otherwise, TP HIT 230 pips.
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 18 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Forex · 128,607#1
@Forex_Signals_Level_Up · 32,497#2
@Forex_Signals_4x · 13,389#3
@goldsnipers11 · 195,022#4
@Forex_Signal_Freeeeee · 27,395#5
@Forex_Signals_Pirates · 9,060#6
@EasyForexPips · 242,954#7
@Forex_Signals_Scalping · 12,906#8
@Forex_Signals_Bulls1 · 3,358#9
@Forex_Signals_Ocean · 2,986#10
@Gold_Crypto_News · 14,569#11
@Advance3882 · 4#12
@Education_Cycle01 · 7,095#13
@TURBOtradersInternationals · 118,443#14
@forexero · 77,229#15
@Forex_Signals_Forthewin · 9,218#16
@Forex_Signals_Kings · 3,012#17
@ForexSignalsFxS · 6,711#18
@ForexSignalsWolves · 1,223#19
@HugoTradingxGOLD · 26,226#20
@fxforextech974ptd · 4,249#21
@MrHenrys122 · 64,313#22
@forexus · 4,303#23
@FX_Gold_killler · 10,754#24
@withtradeLzbzjxudhd11 · 33,272#25
@fxpipspredators007 · 41,836#26
@AplusFxSignal · 14,254#27
@Forex_Signals_EliteFx · 12,987#28
@GoldenWolfFreeGOldSignal5 · 12,255#29
@KingOfForexProOfficial · 28,578#30
@SuccessForexSignals · 21,621#31
@CurrencyBoy11 · 24,531#32
@US30Marketview · 14,512#33
@xauusdsignalspip · 18,253#34
@METABEARTRADING1 · 16,656#35
@wfr_analysis · 38,804#36
@UnitedSignalsFX · 26,010#37
@BestForexSignals_FREEchannel · 22,599#38
@usoilwtisignals · 3,595#39
@GOLDTRADERJACK510 · 21,961#40
@pipxpert · 25,720#41
@forexsignalsxauusd · 10,949#42
@RLindaTrade · 27,140#43
@forexgoldbox12333 · 15,729#44
@Novascalperchannel · 23,740#45
@thelimitlessfx · 33,592#46
@forexanalysis · 114,338#47
@bengoldtrader · 354,113#48
@wells_crypto · 69,247#49
@mmsignalsfx · 104,630#50
@fxstreetforex · 103,471#51
@schooloftrades · 154,454#52
@jamesgoldmaster · 130,677#53
@crypto_wolf_com · 25,574#54
@RioTraders · 78,021#55
@octa_analytics · 75,529#56
@goldprotradertame · 43,543#57
@wolffxvip · 24,011#58
@nas100sniper · 36,240#59
@Forex_LiveStream · 103,106#60
@forexsignalstrialgroup · 27,600#61
@brentsnipers · 19,066#62
@fastplanetnews · 41,901#63
@XAUUSDK · 12,513#64
@tradewithpatfree · 77,551#65
@vipalgos · 22,250#66
@El_SayaadEX · 55,386#67
@Nas100freepip · 41,180#68
@vincentgoldtrader · 57,713#69
@goldboosternow · 2,837#70
@goldtradersunny · 112,818#71
@ForexBreakingNews · 367,847#72
@Tradelikemalikagroup · 113,842#73
@FokiyoksMovement · 79,364#74
@SoodLayer2024 · 36,232#75
@tradersparadise · 249,629#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Forex_Signals_Extremepips_Fx · 24,094
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 17 September 2026
@Forex_Signal_Freeeeee · 27,395
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
@Forex_Signals_Level_Up · 32,497
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
@Forex · 128,607
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 August 2026
@signale · 21,573
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 September 2026
@forexapextrade · 158,226
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 August 2026
@Forex_Signals_PIPs_Signal_Fx · 24,866
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
@Forex_Signal_Fx_Signals_Best · 34,706
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
@signal_forex5 · 135,311
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
@Alex_goldtraderr · 21,410
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 23 September 2026
@forex_factory_signals1 · 26,291
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 12 September 2026
@forexero · 77,229
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
@GBPJPY_FOREXSUPPORT · 91,491
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 16 August 2026
@pipxpert · 25,720
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 September 2026
@USOILCRUDEOIL1_Admins · 118,949
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 24 August 2026
@goldsnipers11 · 195,022
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@EasyForexPips · 242,954
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@USOILCRUDEOILSIGNAL1 · 21,964
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 22 September 2026
@Pips4ever · 25,307
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
@RioTradersStocks · 26,494
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 September 2026
@professoroff · 50,147
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
@TURBOtradersInternationals · 118,443
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
@ultreos_forex · 25,091
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@nasgold1 · 84,284
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forex Signals - Blue Pips” (@Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips), 70,971 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_Signals_Blue_Pips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.