Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alpha Crypto Signal

Channel

Alpha Crypto Signal

@alphacryptosignal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,720subscribers

-79 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765014834
TypeChannel
Username@alphacryptosignal
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alphacryptosignal

Growth

3,7203,7993,759.57 August 2026 — 3,799 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,795 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,794 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,787 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,774 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,756 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,748 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,739 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,736 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,728 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,720 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net -79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,708–3,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 19:573,720-8
1 Sept 2026, 00:243,728-8
29 Aug 2026, 07:573,736-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:543,739-9
23 Aug 2026, 13:073,748-8
19 Aug 2026, 15:413,756-18
16 Aug 2026, 22:073,774-13
14 Aug 2026, 00:143,787-7
10 Aug 2026, 14:213,794-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:053,795-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:463,799first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3719.8%
❤‍🔥3217.1%
🔥3016.0%
2915.5%
👍2010.7%
😁147.49%
🤝84.28%
🤔73.74%
🐳42.14%
🫡42.14%
😱10.535%
🤯10.535%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 04:41 UTC46 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thoughts on #QNT: $QNT is forming a falling wedge after a prolonged decline, with price now pressing against the upper trendline. The compression looks promising and suggests a breakout could be approaching. A confirmed breakout above the wedge would turn the setup bullish and open the door for further upside. Until then, $QNT needs to clear the upper trendline for confirmation.

👍21🔥1😁1

8 Aug 2026, 02:07 UTC67 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Good morning, cryptonians.👍 Weekend is here, stay sharp.

1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC151 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#ETHFI LTF Analysis: $ETHFI has completed a clean double bottom pattern and already broken above the neckline, confirming a bullish reversal. The breakout from the prior descending trendline adds further strength, suggesting buyers are taking control on $ETHFI. As long as $ETHFI holds above the neckline, the bullish outlook remains intact and continuation toward higher resistance levels is likely.

4👍1🔥1🤔1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC166 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thoughts on #TWT: $TWT has broken out of its descending channel and is now holding above the breakout level, signaling that bullish momentum is building. The reclaim of the channel, along with $TWT trading above the short-term moving averages, strengthens the case for further upside. As long as $TWT holds above the breakout zone, the bullish outlook remains intact and continuation toward higher resistance levels is

22❤‍🔥2👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC176 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#VVV Update: The descending channel breakout we flagged on $VVV played out perfectly. $VVV reclaimed the resistance zone, held the retest as new support, and delivered a strong +32.49% jump with solid momentum. Another clean high-conviction setup executed well.

22❤‍🔥2👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC200 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#HYPE Update: The symmetrical triangle breakdown we called on the daily timeframe played out exactly as predicted for $HYPE. $HYPE lost trendline support, sellers took control, and price has now dumped -19.71% since the last bounce, with further downside still possible.

32❤‍🔥1👍1🔥1🤔1🤝1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC198 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Good morning, fam! 💙

22❤‍🔥2👍1🔥1🤔1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC218 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thanks, $RESOLV, for making our day a profitable one. 🔥 $1,000 secured from a single trade. That's the power of patience, discipline, and proper execution. Enjoy the profits, guys. We'll be back tomorrow with more high-probability setups. 🚀 @Contact_ACS

32❤‍🔥1👍1🔥1🤔1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC217 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Consumer and finance apps now account for the majority of onchain revenue. Around 25% of onchain revenue comes from blockchains, down from over 90% in 2022.

❤‍🔥322🔥2🤔1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC208 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Thoughts on #PI: $PI is trading inside a symmetrical triangle, with price now approaching the upper trendline resistance. A confirmed breakout above the triangle would signal bullish continuation and offer a long opportunity. Until then, it's best to wait for a candle close outside the pattern, as rejection from resistance could keep $PI consolidating inside the triangle.

22❤‍🔥2👍2🔥1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC216 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$RESOLV unstoppable. SL at entry and enjoy. 😉 Will share more amazing setups. Stay tuned with team ACS.

🐳3❤‍🔥2🔥211👍1🤯1

6 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC200 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Shit giving us payouts within couple of hours. What more you could ask for?🔥 More cooking in the VIP. 👀 @Contact_ACS

2❤‍🔥2🤝21🔥1😁1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alphacryptosignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Binance Killers®
@BinanceCryptoKillers · 50,679
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
CRYPTO MASTER PRO ®️ (FUTURES TRADING)
@crypto_master_pro_signals · 46,104
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 2 September 2026
WEB3 Space
@Web_3space · 30,680
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alpha Crypto Signal” (@alphacryptosignal), 3,720 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphacryptosignal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.