Channel
@crypto_chell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
384subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001695626536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_chell |
| Description | Все проекты - @lfglinks контакты: @lfginfl- главный админ @lusgun - соавтор @S0ni_k - PR личный блог - https://t.me/relfg |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_chell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 384 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 384 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 April 2026 – 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 61 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
60 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 35.0% | |
| custom 5962847815959843289 | 20 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5319066444883828666 | 19 | 31.7% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Друзья, возвращаемся в строй! Последние пару недель было затишье, но теперь я снова в деле и планирую заливать контент намного чаще. Чтобы понять, что вам сейчас нужнее всего, ответьте пожалуйста в комментариях: 1. Что вам интереснее всего сейчас? А) Airdrop’ы и тестнеты Б) Разборы новых проектов В) Алгоритмический трейдинг / боты Г) Общая аналитика рынка 2. Какой формат вам больше заходит? — Короткие полезные п…
Signed реинкарнация
просто пидарасы больше слов нет
Signed реинкарнация
UPD: все ходят кидают скрины что это раздача за Diamonds вот эти ебучие и что это не мейн дроп просто, но этому нет подтверждений и Grass нигде про это не писал. Но если и так - это метчится с моими мыслями тут, так что буду рад если это правда. GRASS чекер появился сегодня ночью. У вас у многих он в расширении или в аппке всё это время висел на компе. Это награды за stage 2 с 14 октября 2024 по 8 июня 2026. Суммар…
Signed реинкарнация
Токеномика Grass Airdrop 🌱 отдайте деньги уже и все пж @lfglinks
❤2custom 53190664448838286662custom 59628478159598432892
Signed реинкарнация
сбер на айфон- https://apps.apple.com/ae/app/f%D0%B0mily-online/id6769745089 тиньк на айфон- https://apps.apple.com/ae/app/toastmas/id6774629936
custom 59628478159598432894
Signed реинкарнация
Grass дроп 7 июля, верим? Уже пора как будто, слишком долго маринуют… @lfglinks
❤4
Signed реинкарнация
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Signed реинкарнация
крипта буквально кормит приложение для оплаты криптой: https://t.me/antarctic_wallet_bot/app?startapp=ref_d5dfdfa5b7&startapp=ref_d5dfdfa5b7
Signed реинкарнация
че
Signed реинкарнация
🩲 да ты че, базару нет 🌋 Покупаю акки мекса, плачу 25% от прибыли: обычно 300$-900$/акк выходит. Параметры аккаунта : • Отрицательным PNL (от -300$) • 0% Maker / Taker на альте 😯 Кому интересно пишем мне: @lfginfl
custom 53190664448838286663
Signed реинкарнация
правильно нахуй надо деньги целее будут
Signed реинкарнация
GRASS 19 эпоха да идите вы нахуй
❤3custom 53190664448838286663custom 59628478159598432893
Signed реинкарнация
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @crypto_chell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 658,881 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“STUDENT | LFG” (@crypto_chell), 384 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_chell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.