Google is killing one of Gmail’s most useful power-user features by Aamir Siddiqui https://www.androidauthority.com/gmail-killing-third-party-send-as-feature-3694659/

Channel
Creeper's 👻BizarreNote
@creeper69
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001341755906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @creeper69 |
| Description | 只是一个笔记本。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/creeper69 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 41 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 41 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.4%
- avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.7
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,430
- Videos
- ≈27
- Links
- ≈5,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
🐶 Gmail 2027 年 1 月起停止第三方邮箱代发功能 Google 宣布 Gmail 将于 2027 年 1 月起停止支持通过网页端及移动应用代发第三方邮件地址(如 Yahoo、Outlook 或自定义域名),同时取消 Gmailify 和网页版 POP 收取功能。现有 Gmail 别名与 Google Workspace 的代发选项不受影响。 用户仍可借助 Gmail 手机应用查看第三方邮箱来信,但回复时无法隐藏个人 Gmail 地址。Google 称此举旨在降低维护成本,受影响者需在期限前改用桌面客户端(如 Thunderbird、Outlook)、独立邮件服务或付费 Google Workspace 方案。 Android Authority 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆水群 · 投稿通道
Airport Simulator (🔥 Score: 164+ in 2 hours) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6YTCy Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6YTCy
Local, CPU-Friendly, High-Quality TTS (Text-to-Speech) with Kokoro (🔥 Score: 161+ in 3 hours) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6Y27S Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6Y27S
The bottleneck might be the air in the room (🔥 Score: 159+ in 2 hours) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6XMR7 Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6XMR7
Why jet engines aren't made in China (Score: 152+ in 1 day) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6Xyqv Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6Xyqv
Photo, posted without a caption
Meta 员工士气跌至近 20 年最低,公司对策是增加“零食预算” Meta 首席技术官 Andrew Bosworth 在内部会议上承认,公司员工士气“可能接近 20 年来最差水平”。近期的大规模裁员和强制向 AI 岗位调岗,令许多老员工感到不安。今年 5 月,Meta 裁掉了 10% 的员工,同时将另外约 10% 的员工强制调岗,参与 AI 模型的训练工作。 为改善现状,管理层开始允许被调岗的员工重新申请其他职位。并重点强调增加了差旅、活动和零食方面的预算。Bosworth 还承诺公司将支持员工的个人成长与职业发展。不过这些举措遭到大量批评,认为其并未真正解决裁员带来的根本问题。同时,与公司在人工智能和裁员方面的投入相比,这些预算和举措显得微不足道。 Business Insider 🌸 在花频道 · 备用频道 · 投稿通道
TIL: You can make HTTP requests without curl using Bash /dev/TCP (🔥 Score: 152+ in 3 hours) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6Ww5u Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6Ww5u
But yak shaving is fun (Score: 151+ in 6 hours) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6Wvny Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6Wvny
Apple's weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness (🔥 Score: 157+ in 1 hour) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6WvUL Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6WvUL
Iroh 1.0 (🔥 Score: 170+ in 56 minutes) Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6Wr82 Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6Wr82
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @creeper69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Creeper's 👻BizarreNote” (@creeper69), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/creeper69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.