Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dev Meme / devmeme

Channel

Dev Meme / devmeme

@dev_meme

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,355subscribers

+78 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444526092
TypeChannel
Username@dev_meme
Descriptionhttps://devme.me Channel exists because function is not a function No ads? Contact/send meme - @linegel
Created15 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dev_meme

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “dev_meme” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

14,24614,35514,300.56 August 2026 — 14,277 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,277 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,276 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,278 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,277 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,268 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,271 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,267 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,261 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,271 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,259 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,253 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,254 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,246 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,248 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,252 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,253 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,257 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,260 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,257 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,256 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,248 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,252 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,259 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,252 subscribers12 September 2026 — 14,258 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,250 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,256 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,264 subscribers26 September 2026 — 14,285 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,280 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,272 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,279 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,282 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,281 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,278 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,282 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,287 subscribers21 October 2026 — 14,293 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,300 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,305 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,317 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,322 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,323 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,332 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,336 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,341 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,335 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,331 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,336 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,343 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,341 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,342 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,350 subscribers10 November 2026 — 14,355 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 96 days, net +78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,230–14,371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 19:4714,355+5
9 Nov 2026, 09:3714,350+8
7 Nov 2026, 21:2114,342+1
6 Nov 2026, 21:0914,341-2
5 Nov 2026, 19:5214,343+7
4 Nov 2026, 16:3614,336+5
3 Nov 2026, 17:3914,331-4
2 Nov 2026, 15:3914,335-6
31 Oct 2026, 12:0814,341+5
30 Oct 2026, 14:2014,336+4
29 Oct 2026, 14:4614,332+9
27 Oct 2026, 17:3014,323+1
26 Oct 2026, 14:2914,322+5
24 Oct 2026, 12:2714,317+12
23 Oct 2026, 11:3514,305+5
22 Oct 2026, 10:2814,300+7
21 Oct 2026, 04:1014,293+6
19 Oct 2026, 23:0614,287+5
18 Oct 2026, 22:4514,282+4
17 Oct 2026, 20:5514,278first reading

Engagement

118 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 14,355 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 118 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held118 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total184,270
Reactions total3,760
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,200
Videos
≈400
Links
≈674

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 21s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,252 reactions across 116 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 58324508350317886425,49448.8%
💯1,30311.6%
🔥7766.90%
😍5975.31%
👍5675.04%
🫡5034.47%
🌚4634.11%
💊4163.70%
🍾2001.78%
🤝1841.64%
🤷‍♂1831.63%
🗿1311.16%
🙉1311.16%
👎1131.00%
🦄1060.942%
🤷‍♀850.755%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 118 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,435 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 118 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
57
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 118 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dev_meme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 118 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (5.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC≈3,230 views114 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5832450835031788642104😍6🌚4

10 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈3,000 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💯64🌚7👍2

9 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC≈3,720 views181 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5832450835031788642141🔥24😍7👍3💯3👎1🗿1🤝1

8 Nov 2026, 01:27 UTC≈3,380 views155 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @NonsenseFundingTwerpsVideo

Video, posted without a caption

custom 5832450835031788642138🤷‍♀6🤝4🗿3👍2🌚1🙉1

8 Nov 2026, 01:27 UTC≈3,550 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026

*Let’s go gambling!🎰 " sound

👍10

7 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC≈6,970 views114 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 583245083503178864274😍21👍7💯5💊3🙉3🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 08:46 UTC≈4,880 views103 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 583245083503178864273😍21🌚6👍3

5 Nov 2026, 22:11 UTC≈4,900 views92 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Hello darkness my old friend: openssh on alpine linux allowed typing any passwords longer than 256 characters to log into any passwordless accounts including root https://sshhole.com/

🔥53🌚20custom 583245083503178864211🙉3🍾2😍2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈5,210 views157 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5832450835031788642129🫡23🔥3👍1👎1

5 Nov 2026, 09:20 UTC≈4,990 views103 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 583245083503178864295🌚6👎2

5 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈4,350 views135 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5832450835031788642123🙉10👍2

5 Nov 2026, 07:20 UTC≈4,930 views84 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥53🌚12custom 583245083503178864212🗿3🙉3🤷‍♀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @dev_meme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Programmer Jokes
@programmerjokes · 106,012
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
The Devs
@thedevs · 31,916
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Programmer Humor
@programmer_humor · 21,320
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 September 2026
Hacker News
@hacker_news_feed · 30,560
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Memes
@bestmemes · 103,392
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Linuxgram 🐧
@linuxgram · 72,399
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
Уголок программиста
@conhum · 20,441
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,840
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dev Meme / devmeme” (@dev_meme), 14,355 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dev_meme.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.