2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,095–1,097 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 12:19
1,096
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
1,096
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
516
Videos
70
Links
208
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
202 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
46
22.8%
👏
22
10.9%
custom 5240144866041679825
20
9.90%
🌭
18
8.91%
custom 5239951742837215440
14
6.93%
custom 5238036363516860569
12
5.94%
custom 5238159040667735763
12
5.94%
👍
10
4.95%
😱
8
3.96%
🏆
7
3.47%
👨💻
7
3.47%
😁
6
2.97%
✍
5
2.48%
🤝
5
2.48%
custom 5238155480139847478
2
0.99%
😎
2
0.99%
🤓
2
0.99%
🤔
2
0.99%
😍
1
0.495%
🤪
1
0.495%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А кто-то от нее принципиально отказывается 👀
Набирает популярность тренд на сопротивление — friction-maxxing. Люди креативных индустрий отказываются от технологического прогресса в пользу кнопочных телефонов, отказа от ИИ и интернет-детокса. А все ради того, чтобы вернуть вдохновение от жизни и найти новые смыслы в работе и своей деятельности.
Может, кто-то практикует этот тренд?
#тренд #креативныеиндустрии
А мы все знаем...
Мы знаем, что многие участвовали в «Рейтинге Рунета»! Например, зачинатели «Креатива на Волге» — ивент-агентство «Мандариновая лиса» — даже получили первое место в срезе «Креативные агентства / События». Гордимся!
Есть ли среди нас те, кто участвовал в рейтинге? Делитесь своими строчками и наградами 🏆
#рейтингрунета
У кого-то летом каникулы, а мы работаем...👀
Но мы свою работу любим и ищем в команду крутых специалистов!
Ассистент продюсерской группы
- искать супер-площадки для супер-ивентов
- фиксировать все договоренности и коммуникацию с командой
- быть супер-помощником в организации процессов
- работать с документацией проектов
Как мы работаем?
Графический дизайнер
- разрабатывать визуальный стиль событий
- заниматься диз…
Уже видели новости об Antropic?
Нейросети и так захватывают рынок креатива и труда, а тут даже основатели компании испугались стремительного обучения искусственного интеллекта. Да так сильно, что приостановили развитие последней модели на уровне целого государства 🌍
Ваши ставки, что будет с креативными индустриями через 5 лет? ИИ все-таки заменит креативщиков или мы прорвемся?
Кто собирается бежать от нашествия ма…
Мы ищем креатора в команду «Мандариновой лисы»!
А именно, ищем человека, который:
🔴Умеет превращать клиентский бриф в концепцию, от которой хочется сказать «вот это да».
🔴Придумывает не просто темы — а истории, в которые хочется попасть.
🔴Может защитить идею перед клиентом так, чтобы он сам захотел её реализовать.
Что нужно делать:
🟢Придумывать продающие концепции событий на основе брифа.
🟢Продумывать наполнение соб…
28 мая стартует 😇😇😇😇2️⃣6️⃣
— фестиваль медиаискусства в Казани 🟢
Уже несколько лет наблюдаем за тем, как весь город превращается в площадку для медиаискусства: уличные инсталляции, художники со всего мира — огромная точка сбора креатива и тех, кто его создает 🌀
В прошлом году мы поехали на НУР с подкастом «За компанию» и поговорили с теми, кто причастен к фестивалю: с продюсером Полиной Петровой, медиахудожником А…
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎉4🌭2🏆2👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @createonvolga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Всегда мечтал(а) туда попасть, но пока не получилось 😔31%
А что такое радио…🗿15%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,051,313 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Креатив на Волге — хакатон и фестиваль креативных индустрий в Самаре” (@createonvolga), 1,096 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/createonvolga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.