Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОПОРА КРЕАТИВНАЯ 🇷🇺

Channel

ОПОРА КРЕАТИВНАЯ 🇷🇺

@crearivopora

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

262subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002460068454
TypeChannel
Username@crearivopora
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/crearivopora

Growth

262263262.57 August 2026 — 263 subscribers8 August 2026 — 263 subscribers14 August 2026 — 262 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:25262-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:03263no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:07263first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.2%
avg views ÷ 262 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.0
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held8 (18 July 202627 July 2026)
Views total315
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍736.8%
631.6%
🔥315.8%
15.26%
🐳15.26%
👏15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC43 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌸 подставки Sense of Beauty - чувства, подаренные этим летом подсказываем и намекаем: стильные, легко брендируются и адаптируются, идеальны для коллабораций. отдельное спасибо за эстетику, подачу и возможность любоваться и наслаждаться #ОПОРА_Креативная

2👍1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC66 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔖Новые коды ОКВЭД для креативных индустрий: что это значит для МСП Минэкономразвития России инициировало процедуру присвоения 27 новых кодов ОКВЭд в сфере креативных индустрий. 🔖 В начале 2026 года «ОПОРА РОССИИ» 🇷🇺 предложила скорректировать приказ Минэкономразвития о классификаторе (ОКВЭД) креа

1👍1👏1

23 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Одни регионы сегодня показывают высокие результаты, другие — формируют новые подходы к развитию креативного сектора. Международные победы, расширение региональных реестров, успешное кино, новые меры поддержки и лучшие практики — все это вошло в новый региональный Дайджест новостей: 📍 Танцевальный ансамбль из Уфы победил во Всемирном конкурсе народных танцев в Стамбуле 📍 Реестр субъектов креативных индустрий на Д

1👍1🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📍 Что делать, если ваш бренд называется на английском? В креативных индустриях англицизмы давно стали частью брендинга — названия студий, дизайнерских брендов, кафе, модных проектов, креативных пространств и цифровых сервисов нередко создаются именно на иностранных словах. Но с 1 марта 2026 года правила их использования в публичном пространстве изменились. Сегодня, 22 июля в 16:00 (по мск) пройдет вебинар «Иностра

1

22 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC31 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📣 Креативный дайджест — главные новости и события, 22 июля #ОПОРА_Креативная 📍Музыка С 7 по 9 августа во Владимирской области пройдёт фестиваль «КРУТО» с пятью сценами, где выступят ZOLOTO, Pompeya, ЛАУД и десятки других артистов. В эти выходные в Москве на ВДНХ прошёл VK Fest с участием Димы Билана, ICEGERGERT и MOT. 📍 Кино и телевизионные программы В московском парке «Зарядье» завершился Первый международный ки

1🐳1👍1

21 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @predprinimatelstvo_osPhoto

На Всемирной конференции по ИИ (WAIC) Александр Ведяхин из Сбера описал сдвиг: от «ИИ как интерфейс» к «ИИ как цифровому исполнителю» — и это уже работает на закупках. Разница тонкая, но важная. Раньше человек задавал вопрос и получал ответ — всю работу делал сам. Теперь ИИ сам планирует и доводит многоэтапную задачу до результата. В интервью на полях WAIC Ведяхин говорит, что на горизонте 5–10 лет это станет нормо

👍1🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🌙 Минэкономразвития предложило ввести сразу 27 новых кодов ОКВЭД для креативных индустрий. Инициативу представили на Российской креативной неделе. Новая классификация позволит официально выделить такие направления как: 🟡 геймдев; 🟡 графический дизайн; 🟡 промышленный дизайн; 🟡 интерьерный дизайн; 🟡 стриминговые сервисы; 🟡 музыкальное искусство; 🟡 театральное искусство; 🟡 цирковое искусство. В министерстве считают,

👍1

18 Jul 2026, 16:26 UTC125 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

#Рязань Важные новости от креативных предпринимателей «ОПОРЫ РОССИИ» 🇷🇺[ШТАБ]! Галерея [ШТАБ] #РязанскойОбласти нашего члена #ОПОРАРОССИИ обретает новую локацию! 🚀Теперь она разместится на Николо‑Дворянской улице, в пространстве музея Солженицына. Благодаря коллаборации с Рязанским историческим музеем под руководством Олега Робинова рождается не просто музей, а совершенно новый формат кул

1👍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @crearivopora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 73,637 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОПОРА КРЕАТИВНАЯ 🇷🇺” (@crearivopora), 262 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crearivopora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.