Channel
@conviertemas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,153subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001324757336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @conviertemas |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/conviertemas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 21,153 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 21,159 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 21,165 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 21,178 | -18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 21,196 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 21,206 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 21,215 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 21,228 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 21,228 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
522 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 228 | 43.7% | |
| 👍 | 136 | 26.1% | |
| 🔥 | 100 | 19.2% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 6.90% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 2.49% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.766% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.766% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.192% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 522reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 16 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
¿Buscas aumentar tus ingresos sin necesidad de atraer más y más clientes? 🤔 Optimizar el AOV (Valor Promedio de Pedido) es una de las estrategias más inteligentes para escalar tus ventas. En lugar de concentrarte solo en nuevos clientes, el AOV te permite maximizar cada compra que ya estás generando, ayudándote a crecer sin esfuerzos adicionales. 📈✨ Porque al final no se trata de vender más, sino de vender mejor. …
🔥18👍14❤11👎4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11👍3🔥1
¿Qué opinas de estos cambios?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6
1️⃣ Adiós a los verificadores externos, hola "Community Notes": Ahora las notas comunitarias tendrán un papel más activo en la validación de información, fomentando la participación directa de la comunidad en vez de depender exclusivamente de verificadores externos. 2️⃣ Políticas de contenido simplificadas: Las nuevas reglas reducen restricciones en temas como inmigración y género, lo que podría permitir debates más…
👍16🤯4❤1
🔵 Meta sigue evolucionando su enfoque hacia la moderación y recomendaciones de contenido en sus plataformas, buscando un balance entre la libertad de expresión y la seguridad de los usuarios. Mark Zuckerberg, CEO de Meta, ha anunciado cambios que impactarán cómo interactuamos con las plataformas y cómo se moderan los contenidos. 🆕 Cambios destacados.👇
👍8
Photo, posted without a caption
👏12❤8👍4🔥2
Aprende a vender más en #Instagram sin invertir horas respondiendo mensajes, te contamos cómo. 👀
👍6❤4
En un mundo donde el tiempo es oro, optimizar procesos no es opcional, ¡es esencial! Las herramientas digitales te permiten ahorrar tiempo, mantenerte organizado y ser más productivo sin sentirte abrumado. Desde planificar estrategias hasta automatizar tareas, son tus aliadas para enfocarte en lo que realmente importa: hacer crecer tus proyectos. Además, te ayudan a trabajar de manera más inteligente, dejando esp…
🔥21❤11👍10👏8
💡 TIP EXTRA: Prueba una o dos herramientas a la vez para evitar saturarte. Elige según tus necesidades y objetivos para sacarle el máximo provecho.
👍6❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤27👍13🔥4👏3
Con enfoque y esfuerzo, todo es posible.
❤78🔥22👍11🥰1
No termines la semana sin antes saber esto. Dale tap al siguiente mensaje. ⬇️
❤26👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @conviertemas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Qué opinas de estos cambios?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Te ha pasado que haces todo lo posible por vender, pero no obtienes los resultados que esperabas?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 16 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Conviertemas” (@conviertemas), 21,153 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conviertemas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.