5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,348–1,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:03
1,369
+17
11 Aug 2026, 21:17
1,352
+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:27
1,351
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:21
1,352
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:16
1,352
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 1,369 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held
20 (2 March 2026 – 21 July 2026)
Views total
298
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
170 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
42.4%
🤯
36
21.2%
🤣
21
12.4%
😨
17
10.0%
👌
13
7.65%
👍
5
2.94%
👎
3
1.76%
😍
3
1.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 170reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇻🇪 Cashea levanta 100 millones de dólares en nuevas rondas de financiamiento
Entre los inversionistas participaron FinSight Ventures y fondos patrimoniales de EE.UU.
“Ahora más que nunca, nos comprometemos a invertir el 100% de los fondos recaudados en esta ronda para reconstruir Venezuela para los venezolanos”. dijo Pedro Vallenilla, CEO.
Siempre estuvimos en contacto a través de WhatsApp. Tenemos un grupo allá donde conversamos y compartimos cosas.
Puedes unirte aquí: https://chat.whatsapp.com/Lllowuhcw9DEcMrPCaFX5i
Si estás en Venezuela y tu internet no funciona como debería, es porque…
1. Los sismos causaron una ruptura de los cables submarinos que conectan al país a la red internacional, según Conatel.
2. La labor para solucionarlo es compleja, al parecer mandaron un buque especializado hace una semana y está en eso.
3. La capacidad del internet en Venezuela está funcionando al 50%, así que todo va lento y demora.
Volvimos después de varios días y un doble terremoto 🇻🇪. Esperamos todos se encuentren bien, ustedes y sus familiares.
Todo nuestro equipo está bien, hemos estado ayudando desde lo posible. Hacernos especialistas en ayuda humanitaria no estaba en nuestro bingo de este año.
💳 Uphold estaría volviendo a Venezuela
Usuarios en X reportan que la plataforma está reactivando cuentas de venezolanos que tenían años bloqueadas.
La movida coincide con el levantamiento de sanciones al Banco Central de Venezuela por parte de la administración Trump en abril.
Uphold había salido del país en 2022 precisamente por ese motivo, y siempre dijo que volvería si las condiciones cambiaban.
Por ahora no h…
🍎 Apple tendrá un nuevo CEO
La empresa confirmó que Tim Cook dejará su cargo como CEO el 1 de septiembre de 2026 para convertirse en Presidente Ejecutivo de la Junta Directiva.
Su puesto será asumido por John Ternus, actual vicepresidente de Ingeniería de Hardware.
Cook asumió el mando en 2011 tras la etapa de Steve Jobs y lideró el lanzamiento de productos como el Apple Watch y los AirPods. Bajo su dirección, App…
🤖 Claude esta presentando problemas en este momento.
😨3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @asilodigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,077,134 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Vacantes Remotas | Trabajos Remotos @vacantesremotas · 129,195 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Mia Astral on the go 💫 @miastral · 131,546 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asilo Digital” (@asilodigital), 1,369 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asilodigital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.