Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

РКМ | Комьюнити и селедка

@communities

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,499subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001118845883
TypeChannel
Username@communities
Created24 August 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/communities

Growth

3,4993,5093,5046 August 2026 — 3,508 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,508 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,509 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,507 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,499 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,498–3,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:583,499-8
9 Aug 2026, 14:113,507-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:203,509+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:353,508no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:363,508first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 3,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
400
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 May 202624 July 2026)
Views total1,200
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9944.6%
👍4821.6%
🔥4419.8%
😁219.46%
🥰94.05%
😢10.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @communities. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC310 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Обсуждали вчера программу одной дружественной конфы. Предложил центральными темами программы сделать три: 1. Денег ни у кого нет, мы все внимательно анализируем пользу и выгоду в пересчете на траты как времени, так и внимания. 2. Бюджеты сокращают, людей тоже — давление и со стороны ИИ и со стороны финансирования. 3. Но жить можно и нужно. а значит надо повышать качество "заказчика" — то есть буквально учить и обья

6👍3🥰2😁1

Signed Fedor Skuratov

20 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC463 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! 4-я встреча кейс-клуба пройдет в этот четверг, 23 июля, в 20:00. Будем разбирать ваши кейсы, от запуска сообщества до проблем с игроками или карьерой. Наш формат: — На встрече нас обычно до 5-6 человек (возможно может быть чуть больше). — Участник с кейсом рассказывает его, а затем остальные задают вопросы, делятся опытом, советами и экспертизой. Я лидирую встречу как эксперт-модератор и беру на себя об

7👍3🔥2

Signed Fedor Skuratov

17 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC427 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Итак, третье заседание прошло огненно, значит переводим на постоянные рельсы :) По следам трех встреч, есть несколько изменений а формате и подаче. 1. Я думаю, назвать это лучше всего «кейс-клуб», так как мы разбираем конкретные кейсы. 2. Третья встреча, когда разбирали один кейс полтора часа, оказалась и продуктивной и не выматывающей. Лучше чаще встречаться, чем уже умирать к концу третьего часа. Плюс, фокус на о

10🔥4

Signed Fedor Skuratov

13 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC706 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет. очередная, уже третья по счету супервизия/кейс-клуб будет на этой неделе, подробнее о формате тут. Напомню, мы в течение двух часов разбираем ваши 2-3 кейса, на любую тему связанную с комьюнити или смежными направлениями (работа, проект, сообщество, затык, конфликт, помощь в запуске). Прийти с кейсом 2000 р., поучаствовать, поучиться опыту коллег — 500 р. Предыдущие две встречи прошли лампово и уютно, у

👍42

Signed Fedor Skuratov

9 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC601 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот вам пример того, как крупняк сейчас использует сетевой эффект при создании продуктов. Первыми такую карту создали энтузиасты, но она была UGC, там еще надо было на карте тыкать, отзывы добавлять, а Яндекс, Сбер и Тиньков заюзали bigdata и получили лУчший результат за счёт автоматически собираемых пользовательских данных. Система анализирует обезличенные транзакции более 100 млн клиентов банка. Это позволяет опре

6

Signed Fedor Skuratov

8 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC501 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня на супервизии для коммуникаторов (комьюнити-специалисты, сммщики и причастные) обсуждали, стоит ли подбрасывать испанцам отрезанные лошадиные головы. На следующей неделе будет уже третья сессия нашего кружка супер/интервизии для коммуникаторов, присоединяйтесь 🙂 P.S. с головой решение очень креативное, но сошлись на том, что такая эскалация с сумасшедшими - чревата.

6😁3

Signed Fedor Skuratov

2 Jul 2026, 15:55 UTC682 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прочел тут самопрезентацию одного спикера в соседском дружественном сообществе. А что, ну, может тоже назваться Гуру-мастер позитивных вайбов в сообществах, вдохновителем миров, Ибн Кришной с астральным Дрожанием будущих Поколений?

😁8🔥2👍1😢1

Signed Fedor Skuratov

2 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈22,600 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Коммерсант» со ссылкой на исследование медиагруппы «Родная речь» пишет, что за январь-май 2026 года дневной охват Instagram* вырос на 19%, до 7,4 млн человек, Discord — на 21%, до 1,1 млн, а Threads — почти в 1,9 раза, до 300,7 тыс. При этом у Telegram показатель снизился почти наполовину, до 40,25 млн человек, у WhatsApp — на 43%, до 25,6 млн. У Viber, Snapchat, TikTok и Facebook* тоже зафиксировали падение актива.

6🔥3👍2

Signed Fedor Skuratov

1 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC623 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В пятницу мы провели первый формат супервизии — у нас получилось среднее между супер- и интервизией (это когда кейс разбирают все). На встрече у нас все кейсы фактически вышли про карьеру, а точнее, «что делать дальше». Какие выводы: — решил чуть чуть изменить формат — на каждый созвон берем 2-3 кейса, не более — мы разобрали четыре и это заняло три часа, столько не каждый выдержит :) — с кейсом это будет по прежне

🔥43👍3

Signed Fedor Skuratov

25 Jun 2026, 16:32 UTC730 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Я не уверен, но похоже что нащупал интересное изменение в модели подготовки к консультациям. Завтра у меня двухчасовая проектная сессия с клиентом, который хочет собрать сообщество, которое одновременно будет неким производственным цехом, сидящим на воронке входящих заказов. Что-то вроде артели, да. Я достаточно долго сегодня крутил разные модели, у меня и своя вариация community canvas есть. Но, в общем. Раньше я б

15🔥2👍1

Signed Fedor Skuratov

24 Jun 2026, 09:21 UTC576 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Провел за прошедшие с момента анонса две недели в сумме более десятка консультаций и подметил повторяющийся паттерн в разрезе бизнес-клубов и других сообществ, которые люди хотят собрать: Общение участников и ресурсы, вроде доверия, которые в ходе него образуются, предполагаются основными ценностями, но того, ради чего общение осуществляется, нет. Доверие, сеть контактов, круг единомышленников — это всё хорошо, но в

7🔥1

Signed Fedor Skuratov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @communities. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 325,350 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РКМ | Комьюнити и селедка” (@communities), 3,499 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/communities.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.