Con chi competono oggi i contenuti condivisi dai brand sui social? Con i contenuti dei rispettivi competitor, sicuramente, ma soprattutto con tutto ciò che intrattiene il pubblico: video, creator, meme, serie, format divulgativi. Ecco perché è lungimirante e strategico ripensare il modo di comunicare, trasformando i contenuti in qualcosa che le persone scelgono di seguire e non solo di subire. Ne parliamo nel nuov…

Channel
Comm to Action
@comm2action
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
106subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001342610342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @comm2action |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/comm2action |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 106 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 107 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 108 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 108 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 11.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 May 2025 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Che cosa rende davvero efficace una campagna di marketing nel settore del lusso? I brand luxury costruiscono immaginari che vanno oltre il prodotto fisico: raccontano storie e creano esperienze capaci di emozionare e coinvolgere rafforzando il proprio posizionamento nel tempo. Nel nuovo articolo analizziamo tre casi che hanno lasciato il segno: 🔹 Gucci e il lusso come linguaggio culturale 🔹 Chanel e lo storytellin…
Un creator con meno follower può generare risultati migliori di un influencer molto più noto? Sempre più spesso la risposta è sì. Nel marketing locale, ciò che conta non è soltanto la portata dei contenuti, ma la qualità della relazione costruita con la community. Per questo i micro influencer stanno assumendo un ruolo sempre più centrale nelle strategie di comunicazione, tra: 🔹 engagement reale 🔹 community vertic…
Perché ascoltiamo sempre più podcast? Il loro successo non è (solo) nei contenuti ma nel modo in cui si inseriscono nelle nostre vite: non interrompono la routine ma, al contrario, si infilano negli spazi vuoti e li riempiono di storie, idee e voci. Funzionano perché: ✅ creano una relazione di fiducia con chi ascolta ✅ hanno un tono intimo e diretto ✅ si adattano ai tempi della quotidianità ✅ non richiedono attenzio…
Quando un brand analizza la propria reputazione, c’è sempre un rischio: guardare i dati attraverso una lente distorta. È il cosiddetto bias cognitivo, ossia la tendenza a confermare ciò che pensiamo già e a sottovalutare i segnali critici. Per questo oggi la gestione della Brand Reputation richiede un approccio bias zero, basato su: ✅ dati neutrali e verificabili ✅ analisi cross-mediale (stampa, web, social, TV) ✅ m…
Sai qual è il vero rischio nella Comunicazione Corporate? Non è “dire qualcosa di sbagliato”. Ma comunicare senza una strategia chiara. Troppo spesso le aziende: 👉 pubblicano contenuti senza obiettivi definiti 👉 parlano a “tutti” senza intercettare un target preciso 👉 ignorano il sentiment online 👉 sottovalutano il crisis management Il risultato? Perdita di fiducia, incoerenza, danni reputazionali evitabili. Nel n…
https://pranista.blog/2026/03/05/il-ruolo-strategico-delletica-nella-comunicazione-e-nelle-relazioni-pubbliche/
webinar “Communication for Future-Proof Leadership.” Date: Tuesday 24 February 2026 Time: 14 GMT / 15 CET / 16 EET Free registration here: https://bit.ly/4kcfHSx About the Webinar: We are living in a time of transformation, which calls for rethinking leadership to stay future proof. The Forum of Young Global Leaders (YGL) presented their view on leadership capabilities needed in a time of unprecedented technological…
https://www.primaonline.it/2026/02/06/464620/classifica-giornalisti-piu-social-tosa-resta-in-vetta-il-calciomercato-premia-di-marzio/
Uno studio di IPR molto interessante per chi vuole lavorare nella comunicazione https://instituteforpr.org/ipr-top-pr-insights-2025/
Oggiano: Quali saranno le competenze e i lavori più richiesti del 2026? L’inizio d’anno è periodo di buoni propositi, quello in cui forse si registrano i picchi di registrazioni a Tinder e ai corsi per imparare nuove skills. E così ho pensato che vi avrei fatto cosa gradita condividendovi in anteprima i nuovi dati offerti da LinkedIn sui lavori e le competenze più in rapida crescita in Italia Li ho approfonditi tu…
https://pranista.blog/2025/12/31/vaccini-a-mrna-e-disinformazione-pronti-per-il-26/ Vaccini a mRNA e disinformazione. Pronti per il ‘26?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @comm2action. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Comm to Action” (@comm2action), 106 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comm2action.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.