https://t.me/wooltbot/signals?startapp=cmVmPXVkZkkzbg Второй раунд.

Channel
Comboton
@comboton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002241996944 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @comboton |
| Description | В группе будут выкладываться посты, которые помогут получить вам Ton и NFT |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/comboton |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 20 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,080
- Videos
- ≈100
- Links
- ≈1,780
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2025 to 5 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/wooltbot/signals?startapp=cmVmPXVkZkkzbg Join me on Signals! Sign up using my referral link: Новая игра от Lost dogs
https://t.me/TheGlanceGameBot?startapp=cl83MDU0ODYxNDg=
Photo, posted without a caption
Совы Not Wise теперь в сети Eth. Вчера продали 1000 шт по 0.005 Eth. Сегодня можно купить на Open Sea за 0.015 Eth. Аналогичные совы в Ton на Getgems стоят от 500 Ton. Также разработчики все хотят выпустить игру. Если утилити у сов из двух сетей будут одинаковыми, то цена может сравняться. DYOR, но, считаю, совы на Eth сейчас стоят минимум и могут дать иксы. https://opensea.io/collection/notwise/
👍1🔥1
🐣 Сегодня мы запустили децентрализованную сеть для ИИ-вычислений Cocoon («Кокон») — https://cocoon.org. Она обеспечивает пользователям 100% конфиденциальность при взаимодействии с ИИ. Часть запросов Telegram, связанных с автоматическим переводом сообщений, уже проходит через эту сеть. 🚀 Разработчики получают доступ к вычислительным ресурсам по более низким расценкам, чем у централизованных провайдеров вроде Microsof…
Смотри, какую игру сделали в телеграм к Новому году 🎄 Если зайдешь, мы вместе получим подарки)) А там уже решишь, нравится тебе играть или нет Вот ссылка 👇👇👇
За пару дней 2 подарка выпало в рулетках без вложений. Кто еще не заходил, советую. Главное, без депозитов. Взяли подарок, выводите. 1Case Epic Gift Virus bot
https://t.me/BroContestsBot/starterquest?startapp=ref-705486148-starterquest Новые квесты от бывшей команды BroBot
👍1
https://t.me/KokoronoKi_bot/play?startapp=cmVmZXJyYWw9NzA1NDg2MTQ4
sorted emoji+stickers of new NFT gifts 🎁 Bling Binky — emoji, stickers 🎁 Money Pot — emoji, stickers 🎁 Pretty Posy — emoji, stickers 🐈⬛ @GiftChanges • Portals ❤️ • Tonnel 🌪 • @GiftNews 🎁
@monk а что, если перевести этот подарок в категорию редкие и прекратить его выпуск 🤔
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @comboton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@giftnews · 3,1086 postsPortals Market
@portals · 329,7966 postsGift Changes 🎁
@GiftChanges · 118,9125 postsTonnel Relayer Bot
@Tonnel_Network_bot · 150,0075 postsEpic Gift
@epic_gift_bot · 475,7481 postGift Models 🎁
@GiftChangesModels · 46,3881 postGift Updates 🎁
@GiftChangesUpdates · 29,5111 postGIFTOR
@onecase_play_bot · 43,0041 postVIRUS GAME BOT
@virus_play_bot · 280,9761 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Comboton” (@comboton), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comboton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.