Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Приоритет для ОТ в городах

Channel

Приоритет для ОТ в городах

@city_transport

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,111subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001113367447
TypeChannel
Username@city_transport
Created18 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/city_transport

Growth

5,1115,1255,1186 August 2026 — 5,125 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,125 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,117 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,112 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,111 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,109–5,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:035,111-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:155,112-5
9 Aug 2026, 15:125,117-5
6 Aug 2026, 22:065,122-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:475,125no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:415,125first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.6%
avg views ÷ 5,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (30 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total13,970
Reactions total531
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,293 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33125.6%
😁29222.6%
🔥22617.5%
👍15211.8%
👏775.96%
🤷655.03%
🎉644.95%
💯231.78%
🥴211.62%
😍161.24%
😢100.773%
🤗60.464%
👎50.387%
😡30.232%
🤔20.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈1,420 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Доверяйте только практикам. Причём практикам, реализовавшим реальные улучшения транспортных систем 11 лет профессионально занимаясь транспортом, не перестаю с улыбкой наблюдать известную картину. То тут, то там выскакивают какие-то псевдо транспортные эксперты и начинают всех учить правильно развивать транспорт. Они налево и направо раздают комментарии в СМИ, по любым темам, даже в которых совсем не разбираются. Во

😁67🤷145💯5👎1🥴1

5 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,030 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gre4arkVideo

Не работает метробус? Это автобусы виноваты! В Воронеже случился настоящий виктимблейминг: водителей автобусов обвинили в срыве проекта «метробуса». Про предысторию я уже рассказывал: власти испугались сложной реформы и решили назвать громким словом «метробус» обычные выделенки с резиновым бордюрчиком. При этом никто не убрал парковки, лишние выезды со дворов и машины с пути автобусов — на видео хорошо видно, наско

👍43😁19🥴10💯9🤷31

3 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈3,250 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Актуальное сравнение трамвайных систем крупных городов (без столиц) Из положительного. Подросли на 5 и 9% средняя ЗП водителей и часовая базовая ставка. В 1.5 раза увеличился выпуск трёхсекционников. Чуть снизился возраст водителей. Из отрицательного. Наибольшие опасения вызывают трамвайные системы в Ростове-на-Дону, Уфе, Иркутске и Калининграде. Явно прослеживаются признаки увядания: - малый выпуск; - низкие ЗП, з

56👍10😁4👎1💯1🥴1

1 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈2,940 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пока вся страна топчется на месте (в большинстве городов выделенки проектируются некачественно), Москва прёт только вперёд, всё совершенствуя приоритетный проезд для ОТ 👏👏👏

🎉59🔥10🤗6🥴5😡3🤔2

26 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC≈2,760 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как и прогнозировалось, транспорт Твери вместо комплексной транспортной реформы (не на шутку распиаренной в 2020 году) остаётся на прежнем низком уровне - https://t.me/zotovmedia/4898?single - выделенок нет - гармошек нет - газового транспорта нет - электротранспорта нет - билетное меню неэффективное

🤷42😢10🎉5😁4🥴2

26 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC≈2,570 views132 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Воронеже начали физическое обособление выделенок делиниаторами Когда-то очень давно такое пробовали в Петербурге, но в итоге делиниаторы демонтировали. И за последние лет 15 другие города не повторяли, опасаясь сложностей с уборкой снега (Воронеж вроде как планирует снимать делиниаторы на зиму). Интересно понаблюдать за результатами. Вообще подобное обособление выделенок полезно не на всём коридоре ВП, а на пробл

🔥87👍25😁87👏3🤷2

15 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,650 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyabirman_channelPhoto

Опубликовал целую кучу штук, сделанных за последние годы для челябинского транспорта: https://ilyabirman.ru/chelyabinsk/stuff/

85👏13👍8👎3🤷1🥴1

15 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,960 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rollingstockPhoto

Александр Егоров: Ренессанс трамвайных систем в России когда-то обязательно начнется В последние годы Челябинск стал одним из центров обновления трамвайного транспорта страны. Эти работы включают масштабные закупки подвижного состава, капитальный ремонт путей, внедрение цифровых технологий и собственные проекты по путевым машинам. В эксклюзивном интервью ROLLINGSTOCK заместитель министра дорожного хозяйства и транс

70👍24👏7😁2💯1🥴1

3 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈3,610 views224 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁183👏2119🤷1

3 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC≈5,020 views136 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Скорость/комфорт/стоимость На заре зарождения нового транспортного урбанизма в России (10-15 лет назад) многие сформулировали 3 базовых критерия выбора вида транспорта пассажиром (в крупных городах): скорость, комфорт и стоимость. Кто-то пошёл дальше, детализировав критерии до 7, но и их можно было условно сгруппировать в 3 основных направления. Старая транспортная школа и наука тогда ещё не разделяла и особо не пр

84👍33👏8💯7🤷2😁2

30 Jun 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,710 views186 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Десяток автобусных маршрутов Петербурга предложено перевести на троллейбусы В связи с дефицитом топлива многие города ещё раз задумались (может на этот раз даже серьёзно) о переходе на экологичное топливо - электроэнергию и газ. В сложной ситуации оказались города, где отсутствует или деградирует электротранспорт, а также где при обновлении техники закупали автобусы на дизеле (Тверь, Калуга, Владимир, Иркутск, Ивано

🔥129👏25😍16👍94😁3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @city_transport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 169,686 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Приоритет для ОТ в городах” (@city_transport), 5,111 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/city_transport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.