Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Circassian DNA

@circassianftdna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,116subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778136555
TypeChannel
Username@circassianftdna
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/circassianftdna

Growth

1,1161,1171,116.57 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,117 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,116 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,116–1,117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:361,116-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:401,117+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:011,116first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 1,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
265
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (28 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total2,654
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧬 Сбор на тесты 🧬 В связи сильным повышением объёма работы и расходов проекта, мы предлагаем подписчикам помочь финансово с некот. из них. ⚠️ Можно пополнить в рублях: Сбербанк: 4276 6000 1174 8205 💰 Баланс сейчас: 7400 RUB (04/08/26) В переводе указывайте "Сбор". Дворянские рода 🗡#Агзагов (ОПЛАЧЕН) 🗡#Жаноков 🗡#Гетежев 🗡#Гукемух 🗡#Кармов 🗡#Тлевасов 🗡#Тогланов 🗡#Хуштов Хакучинцы: 🗡#Ачмизов 🗡#Гвашев 🗡#Кобж x3 лин

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC186 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekdnaPhoto

Узбек из Ташкента Род: Ходжа Q1 → Q-FT112504 По данным Family Finder, у узбека из Ташкента определена Y-гаплогруппа Q-FT112504. Её общий предок жил примерно в 1900 году до н. э. Субклад восходит к древним северным евразийцам (ANE). Древнейший образец предковой ветви Q-F1161 принадлежал западносибирскому охотнику-собирателю эпохи мезолита. Позднее родственные линии встречались в Майкопской, Ямной, Андроновской, Сру

4 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC196 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tschqoni

Лексика осетинского/аланского происхождения в сванском языке Аланы в V – XIV вв. активно участвовали в исторических событиях и жизни многих народов Кавказа и имели интенсивные отношения с ними в торговле, политике, войне, культуре и др. аспектах. Результатами этих взаимоотношений проявляется и лексике кавказских языков. Следы этих контактов видны и в сванском языке. По мнению Л. Лаврова, сваны могли проживать и на

2 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC278 viewsread 7 August 2026

По Петрусевичу они из Бжэдугии, поэтому наверное такой редкий результат

2 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC285 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kbdnaPhoto

ШАМАНОВ (КЪАРАЧАЙ, АТАУЛ БЕКСОЛТАНЛАРЫ) R1a (Y57) Пришел результат FamilyFinder теста карачаевца Шаманова. Определена гаплогруппа R1a, субклад Y57. Совпал с ранне протестированным Шамановым из атаула Къудентлери, которому был сделан Big Y700 тест. Попадает в реликтовую ветвь YP642, которая отходит от субклада Y57 в самом корне. Не обнаруживает близких родственников на расстоянии 3600 лет. Параллельно Шаманову нахо

1 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC265 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

Проект по полногеномному секвенированию в рамках инициативы по изучению геномного разнообразия Центральной Азии выявил различия в истории популяций, а также признаки адаптации и интрогрессии. Народы Центральной Азии недостаточно представлены в геномных исследованиях, что ограничивает понимание их генетической истории и риска заболеваний. Мы создали Проект по изучению геномного разнообразия Цент. Азии и секвенировали

1 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC252 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

О прото-тюркской прародине. Что нам говорит лингвистика? PT - Proto-Turkic ... Turkic peoples shared their ancestry with populations from southern Siberia and Mongolia, supporting the hypothesis that they originated there. ... current genetic evidence is not adequate to track the exact time and location for the origin of the PT lang., it is clear that it probably originated somewhere in northeastern Asia given the

30 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC297 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dargwadnaFile

Почему «встать в корень» Y-дерева — это иллюзия, а не повод для гордости Знакомая сцена: человек видит на дереве FamilyTreeDNA длинную прямую линию, уходящую вглубь веков, и заявляет: «Мы в самом корне, ветка наша, вы все пошли от нас». На самом деле эта линия говорит ровно одно: с ним пока никто не совпал. Это не биология, это дыра в данных. Собрал справочник по чтению дерева и раздела Discover. PDF, 19 страниц,

29 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC398 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Лаборатория начала массово выдавать результаты. Сегодня сразу дали аж 53 результата, неделю назад уже приходило 24.

28 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC409 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alaniadnaPhoto

🐴 Находки из могильников культуры адыго-аланских племен раннего средневековья на территории современной Респ. Карачаево-Черкесия (Северо-Западный Кавказ) 🗡🏔️ Можно увидеть прообраз многих позднесредневековых элементов одежды и быта адыгов и абазин, основных наследников этой культуры. Источник: Эрмитаж

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @circassianftdna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 188,185 of 1,176,613entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Circassian DNA” (@circassianftdna), 1,116 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/circassianftdna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.