Channel

Karachay-Balkar DNA

@kbdna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,724subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001625422853
Type	Channel
Username	@kbdna
Created	Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	10 August 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/kbdna

Growth

4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,713–2,726 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
10 Aug 2026, 18:31	2,724	+8
7 Aug 2026, 12:12	2,716	+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:30	2,714	no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:18	2,714	first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 36.8%; avg views ÷ 2,724 subscribers
Avg views / post: 1,000; 12 posts measured
Reaction rate: 3.49%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 12; of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held	12 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total	12,038
Reactions total	420
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

420 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5233337295632878843	172	41.0%
🔥	63	15.0%
👍	62	14.8%
custom 5233292134051761664	59	14.0%
❤	56	13.3%
custom 5359444458930718519	2	0.476%
🌚	2	0.476%
🤔	2	0.476%
custom 5192992245460001874	1	0.238%
💘	1	0.238%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC446 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

Genomic History of the Caucasus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ancient DNA Studies Авторы: Murat A. Dzhaubermezov, Liliya R. Gabidullina, Natalia V. Ekomasova, Elza K. Khusnutdinova «Позднее появление гаплогрупп R1a и Q1 в железном веке и средневековый период может быть связано с более поздними волнами степных миграций, включая контакты с восточноевропейскими и центральноазиатскими популяциями. Это особе…

custom 52332921340517616646custom 52333372956328788436🔥4❤3🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC590 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

ХУБИЕВ (КЪАРАЧАЙ, АТАУЛ ХОДЖА / ХАСАН) G2a1 (FT245717) Пришёл результат Big Y700 теста карачаевца Хубиева. Определена гаплогруппа G2a1, субклад Z31459, также известный как «свано-карачаевский». Субклад распространён (по степени убывания) у сванов, карачаевцев, балкарцев, кабардинцев, абхазов и абазин. Обнаруживается также у множества других народов Кавказа и мира, но в гораздо меньших масштабах. Попадает в наиболее…

👍12custom 52333372956328788438❤3custom 52332921340517616642🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC641 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

МОКАЕВ (КЪАШХАТАУ) J1 (ZS5658) Пришел результат FamilyFinder теста балкарца Мокаева. Определена гаплогруппа J1, субклад Z1842. Попадает в ветвь ZS5658, которая, как и весь субклад Z1842, характерна для нахско-дагестанских народов (также встречается в большом количестве у тюркоязычных кумыков) и восходит к куро-аракской культуре, распространенной на Восточном Кавказе и Закавказье (Азербайджан, Армения) с бронзового …

custom 523333729563287884313custom 52332921340517616648❤6👍3🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC731 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

АЮЕВ (КЁНДЕЛЕН) J2a (V2639) Пришел результат FamilyFinder теста балкарца Аюева. Определена гаплогруппа J2a, субклад V2639. Вероятнее всего, попадает в ветвь Y25813. В отличие от параллельной Y13668, данная ветвь не является нахской и больше распространена среди других народов, таких как балкарцы, осетины, грузины, абхазы и адыги, хотя встречается и у нахов (чеченцы и ингуши). Из нашего проекта, сюда также попадают…

custom 523333729563287884321👍9❤6custom 52332921340517616643custom 51929922454600018741

1 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC955 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

Галопом из Европы В последние дни, широкое обсуждение в ДНК сообществе вызвала неопубликованная статья «Ancient DNA reveals pervasive Directional Selection Across West Eurasia», также известная как «Akbari et al. 2026» исходники из которой выгрузили в открытый доступ. Нас особо заинтересовал образец I38485.AG, который попал в субклад R1b-FT226354, являющийся основным для осетин (прежде всего – дигорцев), и связанны…

custom 523333729563287884321🔥8❤6custom 52332921340517616641

1 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC937 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

ЭТЕЗОВ (ЧЕГЕМ, БУЛУНГУ) R1b 13 22 14 11 14-15 12 12 13 14 13 33 16 9-9 11 11 24 15 19 32 13-15-15-17 10 10 19-25 15 16 16 19 33-36 12 10 Пришел результат Y37 теста балкарца Этезова. Определена гаплогруппа R1b, субклад Y20750. Совпал с ранее протестированным Этезовым (Басхан, Гирхожан). Попадает в балкарскую ветвь Y91288, характерную для жителей Чегемского общества Балкарии (около 36%). Ветвь имеет сарматское проис…

🔥16custom 523333729563287884314❤6👍3custom 52332921340517616641

29 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,150 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

ОРАЗАЕВ (МАЛКЪАР, КЪОСПАРТЫ) R1a 13 25 16 11 11-14 12 12 10 12 11 29 15 9-9 11 11 25 14 20 32 12-14-15-16 11 11 19-24 16 16 16 19 36-39 13 11 Пришел результат Y37 теста балкарца Оразаева. Определена гаплогруппа R1a, субклад YP451. Совпал с ранее протестированным кабардинцем Оразаевым из Нижней Жемталы, который ещё помнит о своих балкарских корнях. Ближайшие гаплотипы – балкарец Джанхотов (2 шага), кабардинец Джамб…

custom 523333729563287884322🔥10❤2💘1

28 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC920 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Forwarded from @uzbgenPhoto

🇰🇿 Средневековый тюрк из Туркестана, 950 г Гаплогруппа: R1a-m198 Данный индивид интересен тем что показывает скифо-сибирский генетический профиль с дополнительным влиянием уланзухской культуры, и близок к ранне сакским культурам Тасмола, Пазырык, Абусантир, Саглы и др Присутствие гуннов в ближайших дистанциях железного и античного времени указывает на непрерывную степную генетическую преемственность – скифо-сибирц…

👍11custom 52333372956328788439❤5custom 52332921340517616645🔥2🤔1

26 Jul 2026, 12:16 UTC≈1,250 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

МАГОМЕТОВ (КЪАРАЧАЙ) G2a1 (FTD87775) Пришел результат FamilyFinder теста карачаевца Магометова. Определена гаплогруппа G2a1, субклад FGC1160. Совпал с ранее протестированными двумя Магометовыми (один из США, второй из Карачая). Интересно, что обновленный тест FamilyFinder выдал снип уровня непосредственно ветви Магометова, то есть дал результат не хуже глубокого теста Big Y700. Попадает в ветвь Y630879, в которой …

custom 523333729563287884315👍10❤6custom 52332921340517616645custom 53594444589307185192

26 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC898 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

#График Распределение субкладов гаплогруппы I среди карачаевцев и балкарцев. Список включает как коммерческие результаты из разных лабораторий, так и данные научных выборок. Совпадающие результаты из одного и того же рода были исключены из подсчётов.

custom 523329213405176166418custom 523333729563287884312🔥4❤3👍2

22 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC≈1,840 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

АДЖИЕВ (КЪАРАЧАЙ, АТАУЛ АБА) G2a1 (FT245717) Пришёл результат Big Y700 теста карачаевца Аджиева. Определена гаплогруппа G2a1, субклад Z31459, также известный как «свано-карачаевский». Субклад распространён (по степени убывания) у сванов, карачаевцев, балкарцев, кабардинцев, абхазов и абазин. Обнаруживается также у множества других народов Кавказа и мира, но в гораздо меньших масштабах. Попадает в наиболее массовую …

custom 523333729563287884318🔥9❤6👍5custom 52332921340517616645

20 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,680 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

ГЕРЮГОВ (КЪАРАЧАЙ) G2a1 (FT151211) Пришёл результат Big Y700 теста карачаевца Герюгова. Определена гаплогруппа G2a1, субклад Z31459, также известный как «свано-карачаевский». Субклад распространён (по степени убывания) у сванов, карачаевцев, балкарцев, кабардинцев, абхазов и абазин. Обнаруживается также у множества других народов Кавказа и мира, но в гораздо меньших масштабах. Попадает в наиболее массовую для карач…

custom 523333729563287884313👍7🔥6custom 52332921340517616645❤4🌚2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @kbdna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 156,074 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Qumuq
@qumuqdna · 1,1963 posts Qarapapaq DNA
@qarapapaqdna · 2842 posts Turkic DNA - Database
@turkicdnadatabase · 4502 posts AHISKA DNA Project
@ahiskadna · 1641 post Bashkort DNA 🧬
@bashkortDNA · 8051 post Circassian DNA
@circassianftdna · 1,1161 post epic turkic
@janyngyichi · 1281 post Uzbek Genealogy
@uzbgen · 3181 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Uzbek Genealogy
@uzbgen · 3181 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Qumuq
@qumuqdna · 1,1961 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Karachay-Balkar DNA” (@kbdna), 2,724 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kbdna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.