3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–165 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 02:03
163
-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:02
165
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:49
165
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
33
26.6%
👍
29
23.4%
❤
18
14.5%
custom 5332470767231740876
8
6.45%
custom 5332748101859975320
5
4.03%
custom 5337187440186667764
5
4.03%
⚡
5
4.03%
🙏
5
4.03%
👌
4
3.23%
🎉
3
2.42%
👏
3
2.42%
custom 5332576681125255198
2
1.61%
🥰
2
1.61%
❤🔥
1
0.806%
😱
1
0.806%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
6.25%
1 of 16 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
171
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
142
over 14 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 3 May 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
А вы знаете, что портит всю нейронную малину?
Можем сформулировать проблему нейро-видео номер один, которая существует и к которой нет решения кроме вмешательства специалистов по графике или продолжения игры в ИИ-шную рулетку 🎰
Итак, проблема заключается в том, что каждый раз видео или фото генерится заново!
То есть при наличии даже небольшой ошибки вы не можете попросить нейросеть зафиксировать всё остальное и исп…
Пока другие каналы пытаются загнать людей кто в ВК, кто в МАХ, мы в Cine Line Production взяли небольшую паузу подумать и посмотреть на все это. А потом взяли и сделали свои брендированные эмодзи для Телеграм 🎬 🎥
У нас все по-взрослому и по делу, даже смайлики ✨ По-другому никак.
Как бизнесу составить медиаплан 2026, когда бюджеты режут, а конкуренция растёт
По данным АКАР, рост рекламного рынка замедлился до +8% (было +30% в 2023 и +24% в 2024). Forbes добавляет: почти половина компаний в 2026 году планируют сократить маркетинговые расходы.
Цена ошибки выросла кратно. Экспериментов больше не предвидится, только работающие инструменты.
Вопросы, которые сейчас мучают маркетологов:
— как сос…
Дорогие наши подписчики, не успели мы отпраздновать год нашему сообществу, как назрел актуальный вопрос по поводу «МАХ перспектив».
Будем признательны за ваши анонимные ответы 🙏🏻✨🌌
❄️ Последний день зимы. И последний день, когда наш канал называется «Video по Делу».
С 1 марта вступают в силу изменения в законе о государственном языке, и мы, как и многие, переходим на кириллицу. Встречайте: «Видео по Делу».
По сути ничего не меняется: мы всё так же будем говорить о съёмках, сценариях, драматургии и о том, как киноязык работает на бизнес. Зато сам факт изменения заставил нас задуматься о чём-то…
Как создать по-настоящему «вкусный» визуал, который продаёт
Делимся инсайтами из нашего Трендбука 2026.
«У людей дефицит человечности — на фоне переизбытка ИИ, инфошума и осознания, что алгоритмы всё больше определяют наш выбор. Сюжетные видео — это определённо актуальная и востребованная история».
Цитата принадлежит Марии Абдуллиной - креативному продюсеру и фуд-стилисту Рекламной Фотостудии Сергея Мартьяхина. Вот…
Сегодня в качестве отдыха от лонгридов хотели бы вспомнить классику — «Реквием по мечте» режиссёра Даррена Аронофски.
Разберём сцену, которая отражает суть киноязыка и является поворотной. В этой сцене героиня решилась на авантюру с телевизионным шоу и положила заявку в почтовый ящик (на 23-й минуте фильма). Этот эпизод также является переходом сюжета из первого акта во второй.
⤴️ Взлёт камеры вверх, которому предш…
Кейс о том, как живой медведь с живым сербом прорекламировали смартфон Honor X9d
Мы обещали мишку — мишка в кадре) Кстати, забавный момент — под публикацией в соцсетях есть люди, которые сомневаются в том, что это был живой медведь и думают, что это ИИ. Наш кейс на Workspace развеет эти сомнения :)
Видео снималось совместно с рекламным агентством DOBRO, креатив, сценарий и предпродакшен были тоже от них. Режиссёром…
От барашков до медведей: как показать преимущества вашей техники за 5 секунд 🐏🐻🚛🏍
Давайте разберём кейс из трендбука, который классно демонстрирует одну волшебную формулу:
Запоминающийся образ лучше всего продаст технические характеристики вашего продукта (даже самого неповоротливого или не фотогеничного на ваш взгляд).
Вместо скучных цифр и сравнений в литрах эта однокадровая и супер бюджетная (!) реклама показыва…
Пояснительная кинобригада уже выехала 🚔
Для кинематографичности важно сочетать разные техники съёмки:
➡️Стедикам создан для широких углов и очень ограничивает: не будет акцентов на крупных планах, макро съёмки и точности движений.
➡️Для динамичных, но точных кадров частенько используют штатив с подвижной головой, рельсы или Дана Долли для рекламного наезда (фото 1). Эти же рельсы можно использовать и для плавного, …
🔥4⚡3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cineline_prod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 3 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Видео по Делу🔝” (@cineline_prod), 163 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cineline_prod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
