Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Циферки и мода

Channel

Циферки и мода

@ciferki_i_moda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

684subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729103849
TypeChannel
Username@ciferki_i_moda
Descriptionhttps://boosty.to/ciferki_i_moda. «Любое творчество - это цифры» Ибрагим Гатциев
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ciferki_i_moda

Growth

6847 Aug 2026, 16:33 — 684 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:31 — 684 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 16:338 Aug 2026, 02:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 683–685 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:31684no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:33684first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 684 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (8 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,648
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
805
Videos
31
Links
491

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4443.1%
🔥1413.7%
😁109.80%
98.82%
👍98.82%
🦄76.86%
❤‍🔥21.96%
👏21.96%
😍21.96%
🤯21.96%
💋10.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC133 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LYST Index за 2 квартал подъехал. По продуктам: спорт сильно повлиял (финал NBA и чемпионат мира по футболу. И вообще, волейбольный Локо, напишите уже мне. Сделаем прям хорошо и заработаем много денег 😁). Ну и летняя обувь тоже в тренде. Вьетнамки с нами. И как всегда большая часть в топе - не одежда. Из брендов интересно взлетел Massimo Dutti. Chanel взлетать некуда, да вроде и цифры они красивые показывают.

👍21

3 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC179 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, Business of Fashion подготовил нам путеводитель по лучшим концепт-сторам мира. Если уж не из-за них лететь (может мне в Шанхай?! И визу не надо, и лететь недалеко 🤔), так хотя бы по пути не забудьте зайти за вдохновением.

32❤‍🔥2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC259 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера нашла самый модный университет Новосибирска - НГУАДИ - его оформлял Versace 😁 Конечно, это исторические 100летние плитка и ковка с меандром. Плитку нашли под кучей слоев, нежно восстановили и даже разрешают топтать.

8🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC231 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Теория Коллаборация - инструмент маркетинга, а не повышения продаж за счет SKU из коллабы. Она должна быть сильно ограничена по глубине и продаться так быстро, сколько живет инфоповод о ней. Желательно с видимыми очередями. Конечно, никаких скидок. Если всё это случилось, появится желание допроизвести. В большинстве случаев лучше этого не делать. Практика Прошло 16 недель с момента выпуска коллабы Ekonika x Lavarice

👍541

25 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC293 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем хроники выкатывания осени. На неделе у 2MOOD появились 41 SKU в продаже и еще 36 SKU обещают скоро (но это неточно).

4🤯2

24 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC284 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Начала сейчас слушать про теорию решения изобретательских задач, потому что создание одежды - одна из них. Традиционное решение — компромисс, когда мы сознательно поступаемся одними параметрами в пользу других. ТРИЗ ориентирует мышление изобретателя в противоположном направлении. Необходимо не стремиться к компромиссу, а наоборот, сознательно усиливать противоречие. ТРИЗ доказала, что на определенном этапе усложнени

🔥32

22 Jul 2026, 05:50 UTC269 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#хозяйкеназаметку У LIME в начале апреля вышла приталенная рубашка из хлопка в красную клетку. Сделали соответствующую летнюю съемку. Продали за две недели. В июле повторили её, добавили ещё в голубом цвете и сделали уже более офисную съемку (официальный back to office не за горами). Выводы: ▪️ если гипотеза сработала, можно повторить её в ближайший подходящий сезон. Если вещь внесезонная, как рубашка, то можно поп

93👍1

14 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC314 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кто-то из Planta Rosa тоже почитывает нас на досуге и берет советы для других брендов 😁 Юна - стилистка Планты, девушка справа - съемка из ассортимента Планты (а я все еще думаю, что мне нужен этот кейп из ПВХ).

😁32

14 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC369 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @shkomarovaPhoto

Нравится тренд на туфли из магазинов для бальных танцев Слева — стилистка Юна Вертука. Справа — Кристина в луке, собранном Софией Философией

2

11 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC386 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем следить за тем, какой кофе популярен в 2MOOD. Кажется, сейчас американо и молоко пьют отдельно 😁

😁75

10 Jul 2026, 05:50 UTC362 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если вас не хватает на книги Пастуро, то тут можно узнать истории происхождения 252 оттенков 🎨 Важны не только цифры.

🦄72😍2💋1

8 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC405 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мы тут про цифры или как?! Одним из основных материалов любого SS сезона стал лён и смесовки с ним, и мы посмотрим, как его поставляют LIME и 2MOOD. Данные, конечно же, из собственноручно собранной аналитики. Мы смотрим, как изменялось количество SKU со льном в течение января-июня 2026. Что мы видим: максимальная доля льна в ассортименте 10-13%. Доля 100% льна не превышает 2-5% от общего количества (или 25-35% от вс

🔥95👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ciferki_i_moda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 791,502 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Циферки и мода” (@ciferki_i_moda), 684 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ciferki_i_moda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.