Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

سی گرام | لینکدونی یک دیزاینر

@cgramir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

124subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001411795735
TypeChannel
Username@cgramir
Description🗂 یه جا برای اشتراک محتوا‌های دنیای پروداکت 🎯 هر چی که به دردم خورده رو اینجا می‌ذارم ⚡️ از ابزارهای باحال تا منابع کاربردی ✍️ گاهی هم از تجربه‌های خودم می‌نویسم 🌐 https://ahmadabbasi.com
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cgramir

Growth

1247 Aug 2026, 20:34 — 124 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 124 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:349 Aug 2026, 03:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:01124no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:34124first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.1%
avg views ÷ 124 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.4
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held19 (18 May 20263 August 2026)
Views total162
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
100
Videos
22
Links
182

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mohammad_zammaniPhoto

اگه برای طراحی رابط کاربر و تجربه کاربر (UI/UX) از هوش مصنوعی کمک می‌گیری، خیلی احتمال داره با یه مشکل تکراری درگیر شده باشی: اسم خیلی از اجزای رابط کاربری رو دقیق نمی‌دونی که بتونی درست توی پرامپت‌ها ازشون استفاده کنی، برای همین یا خروجی‌ها مبهم می‌شن، یا نتیجه‌ی AI با چیزی که تو تو ذهن‌ت داشتی فرق می‌کنه. این دقیقاً همون جاییه که NameThatUI وارد می‌شه و قضیه رو برات راحت‌تر می‌کنه. پلتفرم NameThatUI در اصل یه دیک

👍2

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

3 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mohammad_zammaniPhoto

🤓اگر می‌خواید یک صفحه وب رو با هوش مصنوعی تحلیل یا خلاصه کنید، بهتره اول لینکش رو به markdown.new بدید. این سرویس محتوای صفحه رو به یک فایل Markdown تمیز و ساختاریافته تبدیل می‌کنه و متن‌های اضافی، کدهای HTML و بخش‌های غیرضروری رو حذف می‌کنه. نتیجه اینه که مدل هوش مصنوعی با داده‌ای مرتب‌تر کار می‌کنه، توکن کمتری مصرف می‌شه و معمولاً خروجی هم دقیق‌تر و باکیفیت‌تر خواهد بود. این سرویس رایگانه و برای استفاده هم نیازی

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

31 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @MatinSenPaiiFile

مربوط به ویدئو بالا

👍1

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

31 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @MatinSenPaiiPhoto

☠️ استفاده مجانی از Claude و کلاد کد روی سیستم خودتون! ⚡️ دستورات استفاده شده توی ویدئو + پرامپت سه بعدی: https://t.me/MatinSenPaii/4770 ⭐️ توی این ویدئو: 1- بهتون میگم که Harness چیه و دوتا پروژه با یه پرامپت یکسان که با مدل یکسان ولی Harnessهای متفاوت زدم رو بهتون نشون میدم 2- کلاد رو نصب میکنیم روی سیستم و به روش استفاده‌ی رایگان ازش رو یاد میگیریم 3- با استفاده از 9Router، بهش Mimo رایگان شیائومی رو وصل میکنیم

👍1

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

10 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @uxsourcelink

یه مدل جدید پیدا کردم که ادعا مکینه مثل Claude coworkمیمونه رایگانه و تقریبا در سطح هوش بالای اون داره کار میکنه من امتحانش کردم برای من خیلی خوب جواب داد شما هم امتحانش کنین تا پویل0ش نکردن .. پرا میگم امتحان کنین؟ خب چون کلاد پولیه و محدودیت خودش رو داره من تا االان روی این محدودیت نخوردم https://www.kimi.com/products/kimi-work

👍1

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

5 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC109 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @designerdiaries

این ابزار برای مقاله خوندن خیلی مفیده https://www.undermind.ai/ می‌شه یه شبکه از مقاله‌های مرتبط ایجاد کرد و خوند همچنین آپدیت هم می کنه مسیر پژوهش رو 🦊

👍1

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

5 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @designerdiaries

چند تا دوره خیلی خوب مرتبط با هوش مصنوعی که رایگان هم هستند دوره‌های هوش مصنوعی گوگل از مبتدی تا پیشرفته https://www.skills.google/paths/118 دوره هوش مصنوعی مایکروسافت برای مبتدی‌ها https://microsoft.github.io/AI-For-Beginners/ دوره بررسی مفاهیم و الگوریتم‌های هوش مصنوعی دانشگاه هاروارد https://www.edx.org/learn/artificial-intelligence/harvard-university-cs50-s-introduction-to-artificial-intelligence-with-python

👍1

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

24 Jun 2026, 17:34 UTC88 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gigs4dFile

File, posted without a caption

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

24 Jun 2026, 17:34 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gigs4dPhoto

اصول پرامپت نویسی از کمپانی Anthropic ( claude ) 🛑

👍1

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

23 Jun 2026, 06:58 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @uxui_learnFile

دوره Design Systems 101

👍3

Signed Ahmad Abbasi

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cgramir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سی گرام | لینکدونی یک دیزاینر” (@cgramir), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cgramir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.