Channel
@cargoread
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
781subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001561516741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cargoread |
| Created | 3 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cargoread |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 781 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 781 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 185 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
И всё-таки, ловлю себя на мысли, что той самой свободы слова действительно стало меньше. Вопрос, не столько в том, что либеральную мразь заткнули, сколько в том, что как-то сам для себя аккуратнее стал выбирать формулировки. Это не то чтобы плохо (реально проблем от этого момента не ощущаю), не то чтобы хорошо, но скорее непривычно. Все-таки 20 лет (я про 00-е и 10-е) осознанного прибывания в среде, где почти все,…
А ведь в войнах эпохи массового общества потребление становится одной из её сфер. Weaponized. И речь даже не про ее самое крайнее и страшное физиологическое проявление, как заставить врага голодать. Потребление в смысле идеологии, где товары и покупательская способность становятся мерилом жизни и благополучия. В холодной войне капиталистическая и социалистическая системы мерились именно этим. И одно из самых громких…
Вообще, если серьёзнее немного, то у нас основная массовая культура прошла через пайплайн КВНа, а КВН это в первую очередь СТЭМ, то есть сниженные пародии на классику, когда люди не обладают мастерством самим создать сюжет и героев, но могут уже имеющиеся кубики декорировать в смешной и завлекательный фанфик. Поэтому идеальным форматом фильмов у нас были бы сценарии, которые полностью повторяют канву оригинала, при э…
Да будет ЧЕСТНАЯ СЕЧА!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
На депрессоне, на стрессе Роберт Джордан не дописал "Колесо Времени" в своё время и помер! Но успел назначить преемника (или вдова подсуетилась?) и тот аж три книги настрогал вместо планируемой одной завершающей. И книги эти были не хуже других, хотя "Колесо Времени" такая специфическая вещь, только тонкие знатоки-ценители отличат один том от другого.
Олды знают, что я очень люблю Василия Розанова, а еще помнят, что я дважды был гостем на подкасте про секс — один выпуск был про эротику в играх, а второй про вампиров и фильм "Голод" с Боуи. Так вот. Сказать, что Василий Розанов на меня повлиял — это не сказать ничего. Я вообще уверен, что моя жизнь изменилась в тот самый день, когда я впервые открыл томик "Опавших листьев" много лет назад. Ни до, ни после ничего п…
Дорогие друзья, настало время прогрева отчётности Во-первых, лонгрид закончен и передан в редакцию, отзывы самые положительные, так что скоро, надеюсь, всё выйдет в лучшем виде. Я своей работой очень доволен и вообще думаю что это лучший мой текст на сегодняшний день. Во-вторых, над подкастом тоже идёт работа. Не могу сказать что вот прям щас/завтра всё будет, но как только — так сразу. Пока обкашливаются техническ…
ЧТИВАЧ 🔖📑🌴 pinned «Всё ещё пишу сценарий, но потихоньку можно подписываться https://t.me/palmacast»
🇺🇸🌏Из свежего интервью Роберта Кагана – одного из главных аналитиков-неоконов Вашингтона, яростного сторонника вторжения в Ирак и просто мужа Виктории Нуланд: «РК: Когда США проецируют свою силу на мир, американцы даже не подозревают о её влиянии. И поэтому они постоянно шокированы, когда американская сила приводит к ответным действиям. Лучший пример – Япония и Перл-Харбор. Многие американцы вели себя так, будто это…
Всё ещё пишу сценарий, но потихоньку можно подписываться https://t.me/palmacast
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @cargoread. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Да будет ЧЕСТНАЯ СЕЧА!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,095,225 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧТИВАЧ 🔖📑🌴” (@cargoread), 781 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cargoread.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.