Channel
@capitalgainru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,986subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001189106420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @capitalgainru |
| Created | 24 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/capitalgainru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 4,986 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 4,997 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 4,999 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 4,999 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (17 October 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,690 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Обновление инструментов, август 2026 В этот раз есть две новые полезные фичи для пенсионных финансовых планов: симуляция продолжительности жизни и гистограмма длительности просадок сумм изъятий. https://capitalgainru.substack.com/p/changelog-august-2026 #мета @capitalgainru
Обновление инструментов, июль 2026 Встречайте большое обновление в инструменте ребалансировки: группировка активов во вложенные папки и настраиваемое правило 5 / 25. https://capitalgainru.substack.com/p/changelog-july-2026 #мета @capitalgainru
Обновление инструментов, май 2026 Новые стратегии гибких изъятий в финансовом плане и небольшие изменения в анализе портфелей. https://capitalgainru.substack.com/p/changelog-may-2026 #мета @capitalgainru
Насчет нового БПИФ на портфель Лежебоки SPRN скажу вот что: • Уровень вознаграждений и расходов фонда на фоне конкурентов (как минимум, других asset allocation funds) заслуживает уважения. Ну и поздравляю Сергея с тикером на бирже в честь себя! • Некоторые (включая автора идеи) указали на то, что портфель модельный, а не индивидуальный, как должно быть по теории. Так и есть, но хочу дополнить, что некоторая гибкость…
То чувство, когда теряешь деньги, которых у тебя не было. Дональд опять устроил нам волатильность — в курсе доллара, золоте, российских и зарубежных акциях. То «зарабатываешь» сотни тысяч рублей в день, то «теряешь». А в итоге просто оказываешься там же, где был в конце февраля. Quite a ride! #одной_строкой @capitalgainru
Обновление инструментов, март 2026 В этот раз всего два изменения, но оба довольно полезные. В Статистике появилась страница с графиком для сравнения индексов, а в бэктестер добавлен расчет устойчивой доходности, о которой был прошлый пост. https://capital-gain.ru/posts/changelog-march-2026/ #мета @capitalgainru
Устойчивая ставка изъятий от Х. Бессембиндера Недавно в подкаст Rational Reminder снова приходил Хендрик Бессембиндер, известный своими исследованиями о том, что лишь малая доля акций создает всю доходность индексов. В последнем выпуске речь шла о его новой статье про существующие проблемы в измерении результатов инвестирования и их решении — устойчивой доходности (sustainable return), включающей в себя влияние на р…
File, posted without a caption
Результаты по основным активам за 20 лет, 2006–2025 Обновленные данные, включающие 2025 год, по инфляции, долговым рынкам, валютам, акциям, драгоценным металлам и нескольким модельным портфелям. https://capital-gain.ru/posts/2025-assets-results/ #авторские_тексты @capitalgainru
У меня в FI-портфеле в январе появились отдельные акции. В рамках количественной стратегии, код для которой написал на каникулах. Там копеечная доля от всего портфеля, поиграться и лучше понять механики и психологию (алго)трейдинга. Подробности пока раскрывать не буду. Если приживется, то станет какой-то частью в доле акций, а нет так нет. Так вот, не успел эксперимент толком начаться, как я стал еще хуже понимать д…
Подробности про второй портфель на недвижимость Продолжаю пополнять новый целевой портфель на смену локации (начал в октябре 2024). Хочется город потеплее (но не слишком) и место в нем поближе к центру, при этом без серьезных проблем с экологией и перенаселением, но и с количеством жителей от 1 млн. В ходе тщательного сравнительного анализа по 24 важным и не очень критериям и трехнедельной поездки с тщательным изуче…
Финансовая независимость, 2025 Эта цель была достигнута ещё в июле (крестик на графике), а к концу года накопил уже чуть больше 36 годовых расходов, что по текущему прогнозу расходов транслируется в ставку изъятий 2,8%. Или у меня появилась возможность изымать больше средств из портфеля по целевой ставке 3,1%, тут как посмотреть. Изменился расчет прогноза расходов. Вместо группы «основных расходов» и учета амортиза…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @capitalgainru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 522,121 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Capital-Gain.ru | Инвестирование и финансовая независимость” (@capitalgainru), 4,986 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/capitalgainru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.